Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Purnangini Trehan v. State of NCT of Delhi

24 Jul 2018 · R.K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4496

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act where cheques were issued in favour of another entity and the complainant failed to establish authority to claim the debt, holding such proceedings an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC Cheque bounce Summoning order

D.V. Verma & Ors. v. Pawan Kumar Kohli

24 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4494

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against municipal employees under Section 211 IPC, holding they are protected under Section 477 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act when acting in good faith, and continuation of the complaint was an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 477 Delhi Municipal Corporation Act Section 211 IPC abuse of process quashing of criminal complaint

Indian Railway Welfare Organisation v. Creative Consortium

24 Jul 2018 · Navin Chawla · 2018:DHC:4493

The Delhi High Court held that the Haryana Micro and Small Enterprises Facilitation Council validly appointed the arbitrator under the MSMED Act, overriding the parties' arbitration agreement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant MSMED Act Section 18 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Facilitation Council

Vijay Kushwaha v. Chanchal

24 Jul 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4497-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the husband's appeal against maintenance awarded to the wife under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, holding that concealment of income disentitles reduction and the Court's discretion is paramount over minimum wages applicability.

family appeal_dismissed Significant maintenance pendente lite Section 24 Hindu Marriage Act minimum wages non-disclosure of income

Suresh Garodia v. Om Parkash

24 Jul 2018 · Yogesh Khanna · 2018:DHC:4475

The Delhi High Court held that under Order XXI Rule 1 CPC, the judgment debtor must pay interest from the date of decree despite execution delays, and part payments must be appropriated first towards interest and costs before principal.

civil other Significant Order XXI Rule 1 CPC execution of decree payment of decretal amount interest liability

Gaurav Dalmia v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

24 Jul 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2018:DHC:8521

The court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions with liberty to challenge the Reserve Bank of India's Committee order declaring them wilful defaulters and directed the respondents to provide a copy of the order.

administrative appeal_allowed wilful defaulter withdrawal of writ petition liberty to challenge Committee order

M.V. Enterprises v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.

24 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:9279

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award, granting liberty to recover money if CBI investigations lead to conviction or adverse findings, and ordered release of deposited funds to the awardee.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 withdrawal of petition liberty to recover money

Mumtaz & Anr v. State & Anr

24 Jul 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8447

The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a family dispute following an amicable and voluntary settlement between the parties.

criminal appeal_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement family dispute

Kulachi Hansraj Model School v. Yashu Sayal

24 Jul 2018 · Suresh Kumar Kait · 2019:DHC:3597

The Delhi High Court upheld that only the recognized school employing a teacher can initiate disciplinary action and remove the teacher, setting aside removal orders by an unrecognized school and directing reinstatement with benefits.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant employment relationship recognized school unrecognized school disciplinary proceedings

Kiran Gajanan Padiyar v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Jul 2018 · Najmi Waziri · 2018:DHC:9111

The Delhi High Court disposed of multiple petitions concerning delayed FIR registration and investigation into large-scale share fraud, directing petitioners to seek monitoring from the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate while accepting police assurances of ongoing investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed FIR registration economic offences share fraud Demat account

Neelu Sanjay Gupta v. M/S S E Investments Ltd

23 Jul 2018 · A.K. Pathak · 2018:DHC:8366

The Delhi High Court dismissed as infructuous the criminal petitions filed by the petitioner after the trial court had discharged him from the criminal case.

criminal petition_dismissed discharge trial court criminal miscellaneous petition infructuous petitions

Dr. Meenu v. University of Delhi and Ors.

23 Jul 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4463-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer between postgraduate medical courses, holding that the Medical Council of India Regulations prohibit such transfers after the cut-off date for admissions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Post-Graduate Medical Education Regulations transfer of medical course migration prohibition cut-off date for counseling

Guru Narayan Mishra v. Central Bureau of Investigation

23 Jul 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:4471

The Delhi High Court held that exoneration in departmental proceedings does not bar criminal prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act and dismissed the petition seeking quashing of such prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant departmental exoneration criminal prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act sanction for prosecution

CENTURY 21 REAL ESTATE LLC v. KANKGANA DAS & ORS.

23 Jul 2018 · Manmohan J · 2018:DHC:4469

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Century 21 Real Estate LLC against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off involving the mark "CENTURY 21".

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction Trade Marks Act 1999

Vishal v. Joint Seat Allocation Authority & Ors.

23 Jul 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4462-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking admission after the petitioner failed to comply with mandatory seat acceptance procedures, holding that merit-based admission is subject to strict adherence to prescribed rules.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Admission on merit Seat acceptance fee Joint Seat Allocation Authority Counseling process

Capt S K Kapur v. Union of India & Ors.

23 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:4459

The Delhi High Court upheld the DGCA’s three-year suspension of a pilot’s license for repeat alcohol violation, ruling that prior violations under earlier regulations can be considered under the current regulatory framework without retrospective application.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Civil Aviation Requirement pilot license suspension pre-flight breath analyzer test alcohol consumption

Tayyab Hussain v. Steel Authority of India

23 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:4442

The Delhi High Court upheld SAIL's cancellation of the LOI and forfeiture of EMD for failure to furnish additional performance security demanded under tender conditions for unworkable rates.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Tender process Letter of Intent Earnest Money Deposit Performance Guarantee Bond

Sushovanpal v. Sharmistha Pal @ Sharmistha Mazumdar & Anr.

23 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4445

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the mother's 50% ownership in a jointly leased property, holding that inheritance after 1956 is self-acquired property and that the lease deed's joint ownership cannot be disputed after delay.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Partition suit Lease Deed Joint ownership Hindu Undivided Family

Golden Chariot Recreations Pvt. Ltd. v. Mukesh Panika & Anr.

23 Jul 2018 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2018:DHC:4443

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by limitation, holding that the limitation period runs from expiry of 30 days after the arbitration notice and no fresh notice was required after denial of arbitration agreement.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Limitation Act, 1963 appointment of arbitrator

RAMA KRISHNA ELECTRO COMPONENTS PVT LTD v. M/S HIGH GROUND ENTERPRISES LTD

23 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4449

The Delhi High Court held that admitted part payments reduce the claimable amount in an Order XXXVII suit and granted summary judgment for the outstanding balance without interest due to plaintiff's suppression of facts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary judgment leave to defend part payment