Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Sgt Dulal Das

26 Jul 2018 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1764-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension at 20% with broad banding despite the respondent's refusal of surgery, holding such refusal reasonable and not a ground for reducing disability percentage.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension Release Medical Board disability assessment refusal of surgery

Abhishek Chadha & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4503

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties settled their disputes and obtained a mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute settlement agreement

Piyush Pathak & Ors. v. State & Anr.

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4508

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498/406/34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following a full settlement and mutual divorce between the parties.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498 IPC Dowry Prohibition Act

Manpreet Singh Bhatia & Ors. v. The State & Anr.

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4509

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord based on a full settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Asha Malik & Anr. v. Uma Singh

25 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4510

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree dismissing appellants' claims of adverse possession and oral gift, affirming that a valid gift of immovable property requires a registered instrument and that adverse possession was not established.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession gift of immovable property registered instrument possession

M/S. NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. M/S. ORIENTAL STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS PVT LTD

25 Jul 2018 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; A. K. CHAWLA · 2018:DHC:4505-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award favoring the contractor, ruling that courts cannot interfere with contract interpretation or factual findings of an arbitral tribunal absent patent illegality or miscarriage of justice.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral award Contract interpretation Price adjustment Discount applicability

Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4511

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of threatening with a weapon, relying on CCTV evidence and the petitioner's cooperation with the investigation.

criminal bail_granted anticipatory bail Section 451 IPC Section 452 IPC Section 506 IPC

Praveen & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4504

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to petitioners accused of assault in a cross FIR case involving simple injuries, imposing conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail cross FIR Section 326 IPC simple injury

Suresh Yadav v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4507

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of offences under Sections 376, 417, and 497 IPC, considering the consensual nature of the relationship, the complainant’s marital status, and the stage of the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail Section 376 IPC Section 417 IPC Section 497 IPC

Bhola & Ors v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors

25 Jul 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4506

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 308/34 IPC following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent futile criminal proceedings.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 308 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 482 CrPC

Col Anil Kumar Sharma (Retd) and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Jul 2018 · Vibhu Bakhrru · 2018:DHC:4513

The Delhi High Court held that an Ex-Serviceman's preference for sponsorship with one Coal Subsidiary does not constitute refusal under DGR guidelines, quashing retrospective removal from the seniority list and restoring petitioners' seniority.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Ex-Servicemen Coal Transport Companies Directorate General of Resettlement sponsorship preference seniority list

Lally Automobiles Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner (Adjudication), Central Excise

25 Jul 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4501-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld that input service credit attributable to non-taxable trading activities is ineligible under Cenvat Credit Rules and dismissed the appellant's plea for full credit and limitation protection.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 service tax credit trading activity exempted service

Govt. of NCT of Delhi v. V. Jeganathan Arulmoni

25 Jul 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4500-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's decision that a Foreman Instructor performing teaching duties is entitled to retirement benefits and age of superannuation equivalent to a Lecturer.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Foreman Instructor Lecturer equivalence Age of superannuation Career Advancement Scheme

Veeru Parshad Gupta v. Jogeshwari Devi

25 Jul 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4502

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a partition decree, holding that oral partition unsupported by documentary evidence and acts of ownership cannot override equal inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act.

civil appeal_dismissed partition suit oral partition Hindu Succession Act, 1956 mutation

M. C. Birla & Ors. v. Arvind Birla & Ors.

25 Jul 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4512

The Delhi High Court held that stamp duty on family settlement property transfers is payable only on ownership changes calculated at 2012 circle rates and directed drawing up of the decree sheet accordingly.

civil petition_allowed Significant family settlement stamp duty property transfer circle rate

Shivani v. Employee State Insurance Corporation

25 Jul 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4520-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking to recall an order allowing withdrawal of a writ petition, holding that no sufficient grounds for review under Order XLVII CPC were made out and that the petitioner's belated reliance on a prior notification was not a valid basis for review.

civil petition_dismissed Review petition Order XLVII CPC Discovery of new evidence Abuse of process

Avnija Ahluwalia v. Central Board of Secondary Education

25 Jul 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4519-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing CBSE to issue corrected Class X mark sheet and certificate reflecting the petitioner's mother's changed name, as per CBSE rules and Gazette notification prior to result publication.

administrative petition_allowed CBSE change of name Secondary School Examination mark sheet correction

Raghbir Kaur Thr Lrs & Anr v. Union of India

25 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4521

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that mutation of leasehold rights cannot be compelled without compliance with statutory rules requiring probate or no objection certificates from natural heirs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mandatory injunction mutation of leasehold rights probate registered Will

Nazma Begum v. Ali Abbas

25 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4516

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal and condonation application due to unexplained delay and absence of limitation plea, affirming the dismissal of the first appeal for delay.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay limitation second appeal Section 100 CPC

ICICI Bank Limited v. Satish Kumar Sehrawat

25 Jul 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4522

The Delhi High Court held that a suit and decree against an office or official designation without summoning the principal juristic person is a nullity, setting aside the ex parte decree and restoring the suit for trial.

civil appeal_allowed Significant suit against office juristic person decree nullity non-joinder