Full Text
Translation output
$-49 to 52, 63 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FAO(OS) (COMM) 124/2018 & CM Nos.25182-83/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD , Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior- Advocate with Mr. Vivek Jain & Mr. Parth Kaushik, Advocates
FAO(OS) (COMM) 124/2018 & CM Nos.25182-83/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD , Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior- Advocate with Mr. Vivek Jain & Mr. Parth Kaushik, Advocates
VERSUS
HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ritin Rai, Mr. Aabhas Kshetrapal
& Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent No.3
Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank
Through: Mr. Ritin Rai, Mr. Aabhas Kshetrapal
& Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj, Advocates for respondent No.3
Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank
WITH
FAO(OS) (COMM) 125/2018 & CM Nos.25184-85/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD • Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr, Vivek Jain & Mr. Parth
PUNJ LLOYD LTD • Appellant
Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Senior Advocate with Mr, Vivek Jain & Mr. Parth
VERSUS
HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS Respondents
WITH
FAO(OS) (COMM) 126/2018 & CM Nos.25186-87/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD Appellant 2018:DHC:9146-DB }
PUNJ LLOYD LTD Appellant 2018:DHC:9146-DB }
VERSUS
- '
HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Ritin Rai, iVlr. Aabhas Kshetrapal
& Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj, Advocates,
HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS Respondents
Through: Mr. Ritin Rai, iVlr. Aabhas Kshetrapal
& Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj, Advocates,
WITH
FAO(OS)(COMM) 128/2018 &CMNOS.25190-91/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD Appellant
PUNJ LLOYD LTD Appellant
VERSUS
HOUSING & INRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS Respondents
WITH
FAO(OS) (COMM) 127/2018 & CM Nos.25188-89/2018
PUNJ LLOYD LTD ..... Appellant
PUNJ LLOYD LTD ..... Appellant
VERSUS
> . HOUSING & INFRASTRUCTURE BOARD & ORS..... Respondents
T- i a Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank
T- i a Mr. Sumit Nagpal, Advocate for IDBI Bank
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
25.07.2018 Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeals, as the appellant has been advised to move an application before the learned Single Judge.
Recording the aforesaid, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. All the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn. However, we clarify that we have not expressed any opinion or made any observations on the statement made by the appellant for moving an application before the learned
Single Judge. ' , SANJIV KHANNA, J JULY 25,2018 tp
CHANDEirSHEKHAR, J
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
25.07.2018 Learned counsel for the appellant states that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeals, as the appellant has been advised to move an application before the learned Single Judge.
Recording the aforesaid, the appeals are dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. All the pending applications are dismissed as withdrawn. However, we clarify that we have not expressed any opinion or made any observations on the statement made by the appellant for moving an application before the learned
Single Judge. ' , SANJIV KHANNA, J JULY 25,2018 tp
CHANDEirSHEKHAR, J
JUDGMENT