Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. REKHA & ORS
The Delhi High Court reduced the motor accident compensation award by excluding non-deductible ex-gratia amounts, deducting income tax, increasing personal expenses deduction, and adjusting non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.
Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation v. Yogita & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award of Rs.39,53,000/- against the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation, rejecting contributory negligence and affirming the multiplier applied.
Avantika Elcon Private Limited v. Miraenan Tech Co, Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that failure to meet conditions negates automatic renewal of an agency agreement, termination was prima facie valid, and post-termination restraint clauses are void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act.
Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Sandeep Grover, Ms. Pankhuri Bhardwaj, Mr. Tarang Agarwal & Mr. Anant Gautam, Advocates v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....
The Delhi High Court upheld the IOA's authority to select the Indian sailing team for the 2018 Asian Games, affirming that past performances may be considered to ensure fair selection amid closely matched competitors.
M/S MEX SWITCHGEARS PVT LTD v. M/S OMEX CABLES INDUSTRIES & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted interim injunction restraining the respondents from using the deceptively similar trademark 'OMEX', affirming the appellant's exclusive rights in the registered trademark 'MEX' and rejecting the defense of delay.
Avinash & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of the summoning order in a criminal case, holding that jurisdictional and charge issues must be decided by the trial court once the trial has reached the charge stage, especially where petitioners have evaded court process.
Madhav Sengar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of attempted strangulation, citing delay and contradictions in the FIR and subject to conditions preventing interference with investigation.
National Highways Authority of India v. M/S Intercontinental Consultant and Technocrats Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing NHAI to reimburse income tax paid by foreign personnel engaged by Indian consultants, affirming the arbitrator's contract interpretation and limiting judicial interference.
Asadullah Akhtar v. Govt. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging jail restrictions on wearing jeans and sports shoes, holding that prisoners’ fundamental rights are subject to reasonable security-based restrictions.
Rimjhim v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing appointment of a candidate rejected for non-submission of experience certificate, holding that the employer must allow submission of additional evidence before rejecting candidature.
M/S HIMANGNI ENTERPRISES v. KAMALJEET SINGH AHLUWALIA
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking amendment of the written statement to introduce unrelated settlement claims, holding such amendment was not necessary for adjudicating the landlord-tenant dispute.
Dinesh Kumar & Ors v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, 468, 471, and 34 IPC after the parties amicably settled their dispute and the complainant withdrew prosecution.
Pankaj Uppal v. Anjali Uppal & Anr
The Delhi High Court disposed of a maintenance petition under Section 125 CrPC by accepting a mediation settlement agreement between the parties, emphasizing the role of mediation in family disputes.
Rajiv Dahiya v. State of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw writ petitions and dismissed them as withdrawn without adjudicating the merits.
Bikramjeet Singh Sokhi v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of petitions seeking quashing of an FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
None v. AIRPORT AUTHOURITY OFINDIA
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging withholding of security deposits over disputed service tax on garbage disposal charges, holding that tax liability issues should be resolved through arbitration or appropriate proceedings involving the tax authority.
Bharat Hotels Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a reassessment notice under Sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that reassessment is justified when new credible material reveals excessive or false depreciation claims despite prior disclosure and completed assessment.
M. L. Sharma v. Central Information Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the CIC must inquire into complaints under Section 18 of the RTI Act and cannot close them merely because information was furnished, directing fresh hearing on penalty proceedings under Section 20.
Sunita Suri v. Mr. Vijay Aggarwal; Mr. Shailesh Pandey; Ms. Hemlata Kharayat; Ms. Chandni Kumari
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal petitions with liberty to revive them if the complaint proceedings are resumed.
PR Commissioner of Income Tax v. V
Appeals involving tax effect below Rs. 50,00,000 were disposed of as not pressed without adjudicating substantial questions of law, following Circular No. 3/2018.