Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Harmandeep Singh v. State & Anr

03 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4834

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings under IPC Sections 323, 341, 452, and 506(ii) following an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's withdrawal of charges.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC mediation settlement

Sachin v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:4833

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 308 IPC based on an amicable settlement between employer and employee, emphasizing the court's power to end criminal proceedings in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 308 IPC settlement compromise

Mange Ram v. Raj Kumar Yadav

03 Aug 2018 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2018:DHC:4832

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's rejection of leave to defend a suit on dishonoured cheques where the defendant's defence of stolen cheques was found frivolous and vexatious.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant leave to defend frivolous defence dishonoured cheque Order XXXVII CPC

Steelcrete Private Limited v. Union of India

03 Aug 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4855-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking fresh acquisition and compensation directions, directing petitioners to claim compensation through statutory channels.

constitutional petition_dismissed land acquisition compensation writ petition mandamus

Steelcrete Private Limited v. Union of India

03 Aug 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:4856-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking fresh acquisition proceedings and directed petitioners to claim compensation through statutory channels under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act.

constitutional petition_dismissed land acquisition compensation Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 writ petition

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4827-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs appellate tribunal to independently decide appeals on jurisdiction and penalty issues under the Customs Act without being influenced by a stayed High Court judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4826-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Appellate Tribunal to independently decide appeals on jurisdiction and penalty under Section 28 of the Customs Act without being influenced by a stayed judgment, allowing the appeals in part.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4825-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Appellate Tribunal to decide appeals on merits independently of a stayed High Court judgment concerning the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence under the Customs Act.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4824-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Appellate Tribunal to independently decide on the jurisdiction of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence and penalty imposition under Section 28 of the Customs Act, setting aside remand orders influenced by a stayed judgment.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4828-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Tribunal to independently decide appeals on jurisdiction and penalty under Section 28 of the Customs Act without relying on a stayed judgment, allowing the appeals in part.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

PR. Commissioner of Customs v. Col. Sanjeev Sethi

03 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A. K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:4829-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Customs Tribunal to independently decide appeals on jurisdiction and penalty under the Customs Act without being influenced by a stayed precedent, resolving judicial conflict on DRI's jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 Directorate of Revenue Intelligence jurisdiction

Deepayan Mohanty v. Cargill India Pvt Ltd & Ors.

03 Aug 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:4830

The Delhi High Court held that a forfeiture clause withholding vested deferred incentive payments on grounds of post-employment competing business is void under Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act and directed payment to the employee with interest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant deferred incentive forfeiture clause restraint of trade Section 27 Indian Contract Act

Court on its own motion v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

03 Aug 2018 · Gita Mittal; C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:4823-DB

The Delhi High Court held the Public Works Department liable for negligence causing the death of a child in an uncovered rain water harvesting pit, applying res ipsa loquitur and awarding compensation under Article 21 for violation of the fundamental right to life.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant negligence res ipsa loquitur Article 21 compensation

Mahipal Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

03 Aug 2018 · THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE; C. HARI SHANKAR · 2018:DHC:4822-DB

The Delhi High Court held that amendments and elections in AKFI violating Government-mandated tenure and governance guidelines were invalid, quashed the 2013 elections, and directed fresh elections under independent supervision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant National Sports Federations Amateur Kabaddi Federation of India Memorandum of Association Tenure limits

PR. Commissioner of Income Tax-2 v. Sinosteel India Pvt. Ltd.

03 Aug 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:4854-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) where the assessee acted in good faith and with due diligence in computing arm's length price despite a debatable transfer pricing addition.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 271(1)(c) penalty Explanation 7 Section 92C arm's length price

Sheikh Aftab Ahmed Jamlana & Ors. v. Akhtari Begum & Anr

03 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4848
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal in a tenancy suit for possession of roof over common passage, holding that failure to prove title and possession and to produce evidence earlier warranted dismissal.

civil appeal_dismissed tenancy possession site plan Order XLI Rule 27 CPC

Ram Rich Pal Sharma & Ors. v. Bhushan Lal Sahni

03 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:4847

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal as withdrawn, rejected cross-objections as an abuse of process, and directed the trial court to decide all issues afresh on remand including the nature of the property and jurisdictional questions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Regular Second Appeal Order XLI Rule 22 CPC Delhi Land Reforms Act Section 185 valuation for court fees

Sat Parkash Tokas v. Sandeep Chatwal & Ors.

03 Aug 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4849-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the SDMC to ensure that construction at the disputed property conforms to the sanctioned building plan, dismissing the petitioner’s plea for demolition of the structure.

administrative petition_dismissed Article 226 Constitution of India writ petition illegal construction building plan sanction

Premwati v. The Commissioner, South Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

03 Aug 2018 · Siddharth Mridul · 2018:DHC:4850-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the municipal authority to demolish illegal constructions as undertaken, granting liberty to the petitioner to seek further relief if necessary.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 illegal construction demolition

Reliance Gen Ins Co Ltd v. Anita & Ors

03 Aug 2018 · J.R. Midha · 2018:DHC:4851

The Delhi High Court upheld the full compensation awarded for motor accident death, ruling that ex-gratia and family pension payments are not deductible from compensation and rejecting contributory negligence claims.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident compensation personal expenses deduction contributory negligence ex-gratia payment