Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Chitwan Malhotra v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of assault, considering their cooperation with investigation and possibility of false implication.
Akash v. State (Govt of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to accused in a prolonged investigation under Sections 308, 324, and 34 IPC, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation and non-interference.
Reserve Bank of India v. MS JVG Finance Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a bona fide purchaser of a plot from a company prior to winding up is entitled to possession despite absence of formal board resolution, as the sale deed was valid and not a preferential transfer under Section 531 of the Companies Act.
Ram Dass v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for sexual offences against his minor daughter under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the reliability of the child's testimony supported by medical evidence and directing appropriate victim compensation.
S. Manpreet Singh v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 323, and 506 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled and resumed cohabitation.
Vijay Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003 following an amicable settlement and payment of the disputed electricity theft bill.
MR. KARAN MEHTA & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a neighborhood dispute after the parties amicably settled their differences and no longer wished to pursue criminal proceedings.
MR. KARAN MEHTA & ORS. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a neighborhood dispute after the parties amicably settled, emphasizing restoration of peace and ends of justice.
Priya & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, and 506 IPC arising from a family dispute after the parties amicably settled the matter.
Vaibhav Aggarwal & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings based on a bona fide settlement between the parties, emphasizing that continuation of prosecution would be futile when the complainant no longer wished to proceed.
Ashok Kumar Kapoor v. State of GNCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed release of a vehicle seized in an NDPS case on superdari pending trial, subject to bond and undertaking, emphasizing the owner's rights and preventing unnecessary vehicle deterioration.
Lalit Khanduja v. State
The High Court allowed the petitioner to seek reconsideration of the Magistrate's order on vehicle release after depositing a Fixed Deposit Receipt with the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal, directing expeditious disposal.
Ravinder v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and acquitted the petitioner by compounding the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act following settlement and compliance with Supreme Court guidelines.
Pushpa Devi v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi)
Delhi High Court granted bail to a petitioner accused of employing a minor child after medical evidence indicated the child was above 15 years and no maltreatment was alleged.
Sanjay v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case under Sections 498A, 304B, and 34 IPC after investigation was complete and a charge sheet filed, imposing conditions to protect the trial process.
Vijay @ Rinku v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of Vijay @ Rinku for conspiracy to murder and robbery based on corroborated disclosure, identification, and forensic evidence.
Sai Kripa Engineering Works & Ors. v. Narender Kumar Shah
The Delhi High Court upheld an ex-parte decree against a partnership firm and its partners, holding that valid service was effected by affixation after repeated attempts, and delay in filing to set aside the decree was not condonable.
Turning Point & Anr. v. Turning Point Institute Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an interlocutory injunction restraining the appellant from using the mark "TP TURNING POINT", holding that the respondent had established prior user and goodwill, thereby succeeding in a passing off action.
UOI and Ors. v. Sh. S.P. Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a review DPC for reconsideration of promotion after employer-upgraded ACRs, rejecting the petitioners' reliance on the DoP&T OM barring retrospective review.
Ajeet Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that an officer denied mandatory duty battalion service due to departmental postings in public interest is entitled to relaxation of promotion eligibility criteria and consequential benefits.