Full Text
W.P.(CRL) 218/2016 and Crl.
M.A. No.1186/2016 (Stay)
BIKRAMJEET SINGH SOKHI Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Prachi Mishra, Ms. Pragya Garg and Mr. Chaitanya, Advocatewith petitioner in person.
Counsel for State with ACP K.S.N.
Subudhi, Inspector Viijender Sangwan and Inspector Usha Sharma, PS Hari Nagar.
Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the complainant withpower of attorney of complainant in person.
PRABHJYOT KAUR Petitioner Represented by: Ms. Prachi Mishra, Ms. Pragya Garg and Mr. Chaitanya, Advocatewith petitioner in person.
Standing Counsel for State with ACP K.S.N. Subudhi, Inspector Viijender
Sangwan and Inspector Usha Sharma, PS Hari Nagar.
2018:DHC:9088 Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the complainant with power of attorney of complainant in person.
M.A. No.l190/2016 (Stay)
KULWANT SINGH SOKHI &ANR ••••• Petitioners
Represented by: Ms. Prachi Mishra, Ms. Pragya Garg and Mr. Chaitanya, Advocate with petitioner in person.
Represented by. Mr. Avi Singh, Additional Standing Counsel for State with
ACP K.S.N. Subudhi, Inspector Viijender Sangwan and
Inspector Usha Sharma, PS Hari Nagar.
Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocate for the complainant with power of attorney of complainant in person.
ORDER o/^ 02.08.2018 L By these petitions the petitioners seek quashing ofFIR No. 216/2015 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at PS CAW Cell, Han Nagar, Delhi on the complaint ofMs. Manvinder Kaur, on merits.
JUDGMENT
2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that parties have since settled the matter and divorce by mutual consent between Bikramjeet Singh Sokhi, W.P.(CRL) 218/2016, 219/2016 &220/2016 Page 2of[3] petitioner and Ms. Manvinder Kaur/respondent No.2 in W.P. (Crl.) No.218/2016 has already been granted. Petitioners thus seek leave to withdraw the petitions and applications with liberty to file a fresh petition seeking quashing ofFIR in question on the basis ofcompromise.
3. Learned counsel appearing for Ms. Manvinder Kaur states that the parties have since settled the matter and divorce by mutual consent between Bikramjeet Singh Sokhi and Ms. Manvinder Kaur has been granted, Ms. Manvinder Kaur will cooperate in the quashing ofthe FIR on the basis of the settlementthrough her power of attorney.
4. Learned counsel for Ms. Manvinder Kaur fiirther states that the various complaints filed by her under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, divorce petition seeking divorce on the basis ofcruelty, and the contempt petition would be withdrawn by the power ofattorney ofMs. Manvinder Kaur within one week.
5. Granting leave to file a petition seeking quashing of the FIR in question on the basis of compromise, petitions and appHcations are permitted to be withdrawn.
6. Petitions and applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
MUKTA GUPTA, J. AUGUST 02, 2018/'vn'