Sunita Suri v. Mr. Vijay Aggarwal; Mr. Shailesh Pandey; Ms. Hemlata Kharayat; Ms. Chandni Kumari

Delhi High Court · 02 Aug 2018 · 2018:DHC:8356
R. K. Gauba
CPIL.M.C. 1492/2016
2018:DHC:8356
criminal appeal_dismissed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw criminal petitions with liberty to revive them if the complaint proceedings are resumed.

Full Text
Translation output
r - $-15 to 18 HIGH COURT OF DELHI
CPIL.M.C. 1492/2016 & CRL.M.A. 6377-78/2016
CRL.M.C. 3151/2016 & CRL.M.A. 13512-13/2016
CRL.M.C. 3154/2016 & CRL.M.A. 13517-18/2016
CRL.M.C. 3156/2016 & CRL.M.A. 13523-24/2016
SUNITA SURI Petitioner IFCI LTD.
Through:
VERSUS
Mr. Vijay Aggarwal, Mr. Shailesh Pandey, Ms. Hemlata Kharayat & Ms. ,Chandni Kumari, Advs.
Respondent
Through: Mr. Manish Sangwan for Ms. Deepa, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA
02.08.2018 The counsel for the petitioner, submits that the proceedings in the complaint cases of the respondent from which these petitions arise have been adjourned sine die pursuant to statement made by the complainant by order dated 03.11.2017. He submits, on instructions that he may be permitted to withdraw these petitions at this stage though with liberty to come up afresh in case the proceedings in the complaint cases are revived.
The petitions and the pending- applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for, granted.
:K.GAum, j AUGUST 02, 2018 2018:DHC:8356
JUDGMENT