Full Text
$-2,32 and 33 % ■ , . • ■ - ■ -
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV DAHIYA ^ \ .....Petitioner Represented by; Mr.Suraj Rathiand Mr^
' - . ' '. Siddharth.Singh,Advocates.
, - ,, ^ '
STATE(NOT OF DELHI)& ORS ^ ...... Respondent . ^ Represented;by; Mr.R.S.KuUdu,ASC with Ms. ' ; Suman Saharan and Mr.Bhagat
■ - . .. Singh,Advocates with STTahir
. ' Hussain,PS Swarodp Nagar. •
■ .W,.P.(CRL)1442/2018 - - 4. ' - ■ ' .
' RAJIV DAHIYA ■ , .' .....Petitioner - .
JUDGMENT
7 Represented by:, Mr.Siiraj Ra:thi and Mr.,. / -r, - ■.'/ Siddharth Singh^ Advocates.' /, versus ■ 7 ■; 7 STATE & ORS, -,: Respondent \ •. 7 Representedby: Ms.Kamna Vohra, ASC with - 7, i,; SI Tahir Hussain,PS S:waroop Nagar.'.[7] • + W.P.(CRL).1461/2018. ^;,[7] 77 RAJIV DAHIYA Petitioner Representedby:. Mr. Suraj Rathi andMr. 7 '. \ ' Siddharth Singh,.Advocates. 2018:DHC:9186 ( } SATTE& ORS; Represented by;-.....Respondent Mr.SanjayLao,and Ms. Nandita Rao,ASCs with,SI Tahir Hussain,'PS Swaroop % CORAM: HON'BLE MS.justice MUKTA GUPTA ORDER 02.08.2018 GH.M.A.No-108J7/2018(Exembtionlin W.P.(CRIh 1749/2018 Allowed,subjectto.alljustexceptions. wPrrBt:V nio/ims. W.p.frwT.V 1442/2018 and W.P.(CRLJ 1461/2018 Aftersome arguments,learned counsel for the petitionerseeksleave to withdraw the petitions...,, Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn,, ".. J MUKTA GUPTA,J. august02,2018 'yo' Page2of[2]