Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Pradeep Kumar Khera v. Engineering Projects (India) Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondent to expeditiously decide and communicate a speaking order on the petitioner's representation dated 10th August 2018, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Tanishq Gangwar & Ors v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that MCI regulations excluding candidates who studied Biology/Biotechnology as an additional subject from NEET are arbitrary and unconstitutional, allowing their participation and admission.
Dalbir Singh Sohi v. Punjab & Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court quashed the dismissal of a bank employee, holding that disciplinary proceedings after his exoneration and resignation acceptance were illegal and directed acceptance of his resignation with consequential benefits.
N K Jain v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if neither possession is taken nor compensation tendered to the landowner within five years of the award.
Yogesh Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of loan fraud and forgery, considering the documentary nature of evidence, prolonged custody, and absence of flight risk.
Ram Niwas v. O.P. Khanna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's decree declaring the plaintiffs as owners in possession of the suit property and granting injunctions against the defendant who failed to prove ownership.
OAKRIDGE ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED v. AMPLUS POWER SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendants' application to reject the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action based on the Letter of Intent and alleged breach.
Fahmida Anjum v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a property lacking basic amenities like a kitchen cannot be considered a dwelling unit, setting aside the rejection of an alternate plot allotment application.
Ankit Rathore & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord on the basis of an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.
Manjeet Sehrawat v. Land and Building Department
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a further opportunity to submit requisite documents and directed reconsideration of his application for alternate plot allotment despite prior dismissal for delay.
Naveen & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord after the parties amicably settled and resumed cohabitation.
Mrinal Ranjan v. Airport Authority of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking appointment from a 2007 recruitment waitlist due to unexplained delay and the existence of subsequent recruitment and vested rights.
D Damodar Raju v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, holding that disputed facts cannot be decided at the quashing stage and the complaints must proceed to trial.
Surjeet Singh & Ors v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court quashed cross FIRs arising from a family quarrel based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Hem Chand Sharma (Dead) Thr LR & Anr v. M/s. Innovative Textiles Ltd. & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 629-day delay in filing it, holding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL & INFARASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD. v. BLS SUMER JV
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award favoring the contractor, dismissing the petition challenging the award on grounds of bias, breach, and contract termination, affirming the arbitrator's factual findings and discretion.
Suresh Sharma v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the NSD Registrar's letter rejecting the petitioner's claim and directed that he be treated as a faculty member as per his appointment letter.
Akshaya Kumar Panda v. Ganga International School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking pay arrears under the Central Pay Commissions, holding that the petitioner as an employee of the society was not entitled under the DSE Act and that the claim was barred by delay and laches.
Registrar General v. RK Jain and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Information Commission has no jurisdiction under Section 18 of the RTI Act to direct disclosure of information and set aside the CIC order directing such disclosure.
Priyanka India Private Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Customs Authorities to verify fulfillment of export obligations before granting exemption under amended Customs notifications and GST relief measures, disposing of writ petitions with interim relief to petitioners.