Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Kirti Sharma v. NCT of Delhi; G K Sharma v. NCT of Delhi

16 Aug 2018 · R. K. Gauba · 2018:DHC:5178

The Delhi High Court held that the inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC to quash criminal proceedings should be exercised sparingly and declined to quash the FIR and charge-sheet at the pre-trial stage, reserving the petitioners' contentions for trial court consideration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR 498A IPC inherent jurisdiction

Sangeeta Gera v. Sanjeev Gera

16 Aug 2018 · G. S. Sistani; Sangita Dhingra Sehgal · 2018:DHC:5179-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and condonation application, holding that the Family Court rightly admitted the closure report under the Family Courts Act and that the delay in filing the appeal was not sufficiently explained.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 14 Family Courts Act Section 20 Family Courts Act condonation of delay

Prabhat Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

16 Aug 2018 · S. Ravindra Bhat; A.K. Chawla · 2018:DHC:5135-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court quashed reassessment notice under Section 148 Income Tax Act for failure to record valid reasons to believe prior to notice issuance and directed inquiry into revenue officials' misconduct.

tax petition_allowed Significant reassessment notice Section 148 Income Tax Act reasons to believe ante-dating

Laxmi Memorial Public School v. Suresch Chand Gupta and Anr

16 Aug 2018 · C. Hari Shankar · 2018:DHC:5134

The Delhi High Court upheld the Delhi School Tribunal's finding that the respondent was an employee illegally terminated without due process, dismissing the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's factual findings.

labor petition_dismissed Significant writ petition employer-employee relationship termination without inquiry Delhi School Tribunal

Avinash Srivastava v. Estate Officer, Directorate of Estates

16 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5172

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging eviction of a government employee from allotted premises due to unauthorized occupation and sub-letting, holding that mental illness does not justify non-compliance with eviction proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 eviction government accommodation unauthorized occupation

Paschimanchal Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited v. M/S IL & FS Engineering & Construction Company Limited

16 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2018:DHC:5174
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that in domestic ad hoc arbitrations without court-appointed tribunals, the fee fixed by the arbitral tribunal cannot be challenged or regulated by the Court absent High Court rules under Section 11(14) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(14) Fourth Schedule Arbitral Tribunal fees

Jagmohan v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

16 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5148

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a Section 307 IPC case due to weak prosecution evidence and absence of scientific linkage to the weapon.

criminal appeal_allowed regular bail Section 307 IPC Arms Act weapon recovery

Satya Prakash v. The State

16 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5147

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused under the Juvenile Justice Act, observing weak prosecution evidence and non-incriminating statements by alleged juvenile victims.

criminal appeal_allowed Juvenile Justice Act bail Section 164 Cr.P.C. juvenile employment

Dinesh Kumar Kundra v. The State & Anr

16 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5146

The High Court upheld the trial court’s order closing the petitioner’s right to lead defense evidence due to repeated delays and failure to appear, dismissing the petition challenging the same.

criminal appeal_dismissed closure of defense evidence dishonored cheque Negotiable Instruments Act delay in trial

Sonu Yadav v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr

16 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5144

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act, 2003, following an amicable settlement and payment of the theft bill, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 135 Indian Electricity Act theft of electricity settlement

Joginder Singh Bote & Ors. v. NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Aug 2018 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2018:DHC:5143

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial discord following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC settlement deed

Union of India v. Sheela Devi

16 Aug 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:5142-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing regularisation and payment of retiral benefits to a senior employee denied such benefits due to administrative delay in conducting the DPC after her retirement.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant regularisation temporary status Departmental Promotion Committee retiral benefits

Krishan Gopal v. Prahlad Kumar

16 Aug 2018 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2018:DHC:5152

The Delhi High Court upheld an unregistered partition deed and family settlement as valid and binding, confirming exclusive possession of demarcated property portions and dismissing the Plaintiff's claim for equal partition.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition deed family settlement unregistered documents oral partition

Rakhi v. Babu Lal and Anr

16 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:5173

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against execution of a compromise decree, holding that ownership claims barred by the Benami Transactions Act cannot invalidate execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 compromise decree execution proceedings ownership dispute

Union of India v. Jai Singh

14 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:9067

The court allowed appeals enhancing compensation for land acquired in Village Rajapur Kalan by applying the binding precedent from Jai Singh Vs. Union of India affirmed by the Supreme Court.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement award Village Rajapur Kalan

Rajesh Bansal alias Montu v. State

14 Aug 2018 · S. Muralidhar; Vinod Goel · 2018:DHC:5101-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction, ruling that Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC did not apply as the appellant acted with undue advantage and in a cruel manner by repeatedly stabbing the deceased.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 300 IPC Exception 4 murder sudden fight

Shrachi Developers Pvt Ltd & Ors v. SRS Investments Bengal Tiger Ltd & Ors

14 Aug 2018 · Sanjiv Khanna; Chander Shekhar · 2018:DHC:9147-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging the disposal of objections under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act as infructuous based on a party's clarification that the arbitral award did not apply to them.

civil appeal_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Arbitral award Objections

Ashok Kumar Magu v. State Bank of India & Ors

14 Aug 2018 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2018:DHC:9142

The Delhi High Court dismissed two petitions as withdrawn upon the petitioners' request and imposed costs payable to the court's legal services committee.

other petition_dismissed petition withdrawal costs Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee petition dismissal

Madanlal v. Union of India

14 Aug 2018 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2018:DHC:9097

The Delhi High Court allowed delayed appeals for enhanced land acquisition compensation based on Supreme Court precedent, condoning delay with costs but denying interest for the delay period.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation enhancement condonation of delay principle of parity

Om Prakash v. Paley Ram and Ors.

14 Aug 2018 · Hima Kohli; Rekha Palli · 2018:DHC:9053-DB

The Delhi High Court directed recalculation of pension and MACP benefits for casual and temporary railway workers in accordance with the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India vs. Rakesh Kumar and relevant Railway Board instructions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant casual labour service temporary service pension calculation ACP/MACP benefits