Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Priyanka India Private Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Customs Authorities to verify export obligations before granting exemptions under subsequent customs and GST notifications, disposing writ petitions with interim relief to petitioners.
Priyanka India Private Limited & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed Customs Authorities to verify fulfillment of export obligations before granting customs duty exemptions under amended notifications post-GST introduction, disposing of writ petitions accordingly.
Mahender Singh v. Govt. of N. C. T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the government to reconsider the petitioner's application for alternate plot allotment based on a certified complete application form, ensuring procedural fairness and opportunity to rectify deficiencies.
Ajab Singh v. Land & Building Department
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing reconsideration of the petitioner's application for alternate plot allotment upon curing procedural defects and submission of requisite documents.
The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Raj Rishi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the insurer's liability for a fatal motor accident but modified the compensation awarded to the claimants in line with Supreme Court guidelines on non-pecuniary damages.
Sardar Daljit Singh & Ors. v. Sardar Inderjit Singh Khuman
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of a registered sale deed and the Plaintiff's ownership and possession rights, dismissing challenges of forgery due to insufficient evidence.
Sunita Rani v. Ravinder Kumar & Ors.
The High Court set aside lower court orders closing a criminal complaint due to procedural lapses and directed a superior police agency to conduct further investigation within six months.
M/S ARSS INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS LTD v. CALCUTTA HALDIA PORT ROAD COMPANY LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that post-award interest under an arbitral award applies only to the principal sum unless the award expressly includes pre-award interest, and enforcement courts cannot modify the award's terms.
Ramprastha Promoters and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Army Welfare Housing Organisation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s Section 9 petition seeking interim relief for joint inventory after contract termination, holding that delay and participation without protest disentitled the petitioner from restraining the respondents or appointing a Local Commissioner.
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional Performance Bank Guarantee can be invoked by the beneficiary despite pending disputes, and injunctions restraining such invocation are granted only in cases of established fraud or irretrievable harm.
Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an unconditional Performance Bank Guarantee can be invoked and encashed by the beneficiary despite pending disputes, and injunctions restraining such invocation are granted only in exceptional cases of fraud or irretrievable harm.
Poonam Yadav v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken and compensation not paid within five years of the award.
Veer Wati and Ors. v. The Land Acquisition Collector
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-payment of compensation and non-taking of possession of the land.
Sher Singh & Ors. v. Jai Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld a binding family settlement and consent decree partitioning joint family property, refusing to reopen partition of land reserved for a temple and directing demarcation of shares by a Local Commissioner.
Manohar Lal Khetrapal & Ors. v. Hari Chand (Deceased) Thr. LRs. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the trial court's dismissal of a suit for specific performance due to the plaintiffs' failure to prove continuous readiness and financial capacity, while upholding a money decree for rent arrears with enhanced interest.
Manoj & Anr v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 341, 452, and 34 IPC arising from a minor family dispute after the parties amicably settled and no longer wished to pursue the complaint.
Rohtash & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act on the ground of amicable settlement and withdrawal of complaint in a matrimonial dispute.
Abhishek Jain & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following a mutual settlement and divorce by consent, holding that continuation of criminal proceedings would be futile.
Pankaj Gautam v. Parma Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a suit for specific performance on preliminary factual issues without trial is improper and remanded the suit for trial.
Raj Narayan Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for the petitioner involved in a violent incident with firearm use, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and the petitioner’s evasion of arrest.