Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

Bheem Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:1916-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition quashing the rejection of a sports quota candidate's employment on grounds of alleged suppression of a criminal case where he was acquitted prior to application, emphasizing principles of natural justice and reasoned decision-making.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant acquittal non-disclosure public employment natural justice

Panna Lal Om Prakash and Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Ms. Shobha Aggarwal

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8294

The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's prolonged non-compliance with discovery orders and failure to demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 21 CPC specific performance discovery of documents non-compliance

MS SACH ENTERPRISES v. THE COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8185-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order, granting the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice Personal Hearing Ex-parte Order

Anju Rani & Anr. v. Rajan Khurana

15 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8108

The High Court set aside the Revisional Court's order summoning petitioners under Section 211 IPC for lack of jurisdiction and held the defamation complaint barred by limitation, quashing the criminal proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 211 IPC Section 195 CrPC defamation limitation

Mange Ram Sharma v. Union of India

15 Sep 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:8198
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that prior sanction for a specialized prosthesis under the CGHS framework cannot be arbitrarily denied for replacement, directing respondents to grant approval consistent with earlier decisions and medical necessity.

administrative petition_allowed Significant CGHS Office Memorandum 2014 prosthesis entitlement administrative consistency medical disability

Surjeet Kaur & Anr. v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8195-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain Punjab National Bank from taking possession of mortgaged property, upholding the bank's right to possession following borrower default and a valid sale deed.

civil petition_dismissed Debt Recovery Tribunal Punjab National Bank mortgaged property sale deed

Deutsche Bank AG v. Nalini Gupta & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8127-DB

The Delhi High Court held that prima facie observations on forgery at the preliminary stage should be avoided and directed expeditious disposal of the maintainability challenge under Section 34 SARFAESI Act without prejudice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI Order VII Rule 11 CPC forgery of signatures

Pawan Kumar Sharma v. Om Prakash Sharma

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8276

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses a cause of action for partition of jointly owned properties and is not barred by law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Hindu Undivided Family partition suit

M/S MAGNA YUMA PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8267

The Delhi High Court held that Lithium-ion batteries owned by a petitioner leasing them to E-rickshaw owners must be returned despite vehicle seizure, subject to conditions ensuring compliance with registration and fitness norms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Lithium-ion batteries E-rickshaw Battery leasing Ownership rights

Union of India & Ors. v. JC-805086 P Ex NB Sub Kuldip Singh, Retd

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for hearing loss, affirming the presumption that disabilities not present at entry are service-attributable unless rebutted by positive medical evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces presumption of attributability Medical Board opinion

Ramesh @Rameshwar Lohra v. State of NCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8110
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's sentence in a rape case pending appeal, holding that the victim's age determination affects applicability of POCSO presumptions and that the conviction's sustainability requires prima facie assessment without reappreciation of evidence.

criminal sentence_modified Significant POCSO Act ossification test age determination sexual assault

M/S TRAVEL CORPORATION INDIA LTD. v. SHRI CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8237
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court allowed a workman's application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, directing payment of wages during the pendency of proceedings challenging his reinstatement, holding that delay in filing does not bar entitlement if the workman remains unemployed.

labor petition_allowed Significant Section 17-B Industrial Disputes Act wages during pendency reinstatement unemployment

M/S ADIGEAR INTERNATIONAL & ORS. v. M/S ANJ ENTERPRISES

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8236

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order Order VIII Rule 9 CPC

Amit Sethi v. Lalit Sethi & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8224

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit for lack of cause of action, holding that under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a grandson whose father is alive has no birthright in his grandfather's property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 8 HSA Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action

Bharat Singh Kushwah and Ors v. Manoj Sharma and Anr

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8190-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of ex-parte injunction and directed the Commercial Court to expedite hearing and disposal of the interlocutory application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural ex-parte ad interim injunction Local Commissioner Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interlocutory application

Vishal Kumar Mehra v. University of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8209

The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of nomination by WhatsApp message was invalid as per election rules, dismissing the petition and upholding rejection of the petitioner’s nominations for multiple posts.

administrative petition_dismissed withdrawal of nomination students union election election procedure validity of withdrawal

M/S SOPAN RESTAURANT v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8207

The Delhi High Court granted a seven-month extension of the petitioner’s license to operate a stall at New Delhi Railway Station, applying the principle of parity with similar cases and subject to payment of license fees and an undertaking to vacate thereafter.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant license extension status quo parity principle speaking order

Om Veer @ Ombir v. Delhi Cantonment Board

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8208

The Delhi High Court held that no coercive action can be taken against unauthorized construction during the pendency of an appeal under the Cantonments Act, directing maintenance of status quo and expeditious disposal of appeals.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Cantonments Act 2006 unauthorized construction demolition orders appeal pendency

Sandeep K L v. Union of India

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8205-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate acquitted of criminal charges and who truthfully discloses such past involvement cannot be disqualified from appointment to a disciplined force without individualized assessment of the offence and antecedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant acquittal criminal antecedents disqualification disciplinary force recruitment

Ram Bhajan Yadav v. Delhi Transco Ltd. & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8204
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of a provisional appointment due to failure to establish requisite professional experience as per eligibility criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed provisional appointment professional experience Junior Engineer (Civil) eligibility criteria