Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD v. MANOJ BISHT

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8354
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement between parties, directed release of deposited funds including interest to the respondent, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement release of deposited funds Court Registry final settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. HARI KISHAN

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8353

The Delhi High Court directed release of settlement amount deposited with the Court Registry to the respondent, holding the parties bound by their amicable settlement.

civil petition_allowed settlement release of funds court registry binding settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. BHUWAN CHAND JOSHI

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8352

The Delhi High Court approved an amicable settlement between parties, directing release of deposited funds as full and final settlement, thereby disposing of the petition.

civil petition_allowed settlement deposit with court registry full and final settlement release of funds

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. KAILASH CHAND

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8350

The Delhi High Court approved an amicable settlement directing release of deposited funds to the respondents as full and final settlement, binding the parties accordingly.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement release of funds court registry deposit final settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. DIWAKAR SINGH

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8349

The Delhi High Court directed release of court-deposited funds in accordance with an amicable settlement, holding the respondent bound by the acceptance of the final settlement amount.

civil petition_allowed settlement release of court deposit final settlement binding statement of counsel

Mukesh Thakur v. GNCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8303-DB

The Delhi High Court held that promotion granted under existing Recruitment Rules cannot be invalidated by unpromulgated draft rules and directed reconsideration of pay protection and past service benefits accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules 1967 pay protection counting of past service draft Recruitment Rules

UOI & Anr. v. Sunder

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8302-DB

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's order directing appointment with relaxed educational qualifications after the order was implemented and the respondent retired.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal relaxation of educational qualification Sanitary Safaiwala Article 226

Movers International Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8157-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a 16-day delay in filing a CGST appeal due to pendency of a rectification application constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act and restored the appeal for hearing on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CGST Act, 2017 Section 107 condonation of delay sufficient cause

Chadchaporn Thankrathok v. The Commissioner of Customs

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8155-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the Customs Order-in-Original passed without Show Cause Notice, directing a personal hearing and consideration of merits by the Appellate Authority.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Order-in-Original Appeal

Union of India & Ors. v. Har Sai

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8253-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting upgraded pay scale benefits to a Statistical Assistant appointed through direct recruitment despite recruitment rules allowing deputation, clarifying that pay scale upgradation is not limited to posts filled exclusively by direct recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant 5th Central Pay Commission upgraded pay scale Statistical Assistant direct recruitment

Bheem Pratap Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:1916-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition quashing the rejection of a sports quota candidate's employment on grounds of alleged suppression of a criminal case where he was acquitted prior to application, emphasizing principles of natural justice and reasoned decision-making.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant acquittal non-disclosure public employment natural justice

Panna Lal Om Prakash and Co. Pvt. Ltd v. Ms. Shobha Aggarwal

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8294

The Delhi High Court dismissed a suit for specific performance due to the plaintiff's prolonged non-compliance with discovery orders and failure to demonstrate continuous readiness and willingness to perform contractual obligations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XI Rule 21 CPC specific performance discovery of documents non-compliance

MS SACH ENTERPRISES v. THE COMMISSIONER OF DELHI GOODS AND SERVICES TAX

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8185-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order, granting the petitioner an opportunity to file a reply and be heard, while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A CGST Act Show Cause Notice Personal Hearing Ex-parte Order

Anju Rani & Anr. v. Rajan Khurana

15 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8108

The High Court set aside the Revisional Court's order summoning petitioners under Section 211 IPC for lack of jurisdiction and held the defamation complaint barred by limitation, quashing the criminal proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 211 IPC Section 195 CrPC defamation limitation

Mange Ram Sharma v. Union of India

15 Sep 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:8198
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that prior sanction for a specialized prosthesis under the CGHS framework cannot be arbitrarily denied for replacement, directing respondents to grant approval consistent with earlier decisions and medical necessity.

administrative petition_allowed Significant CGHS Office Memorandum 2014 prosthesis entitlement administrative consistency medical disability

Surjeet Kaur & Anr. v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8195-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to restrain Punjab National Bank from taking possession of mortgaged property, upholding the bank's right to possession following borrower default and a valid sale deed.

civil petition_dismissed Debt Recovery Tribunal Punjab National Bank mortgaged property sale deed

Deutsche Bank AG v. Nalini Gupta & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8127-DB

The Delhi High Court held that prima facie observations on forgery at the preliminary stage should be avoided and directed expeditious disposal of the maintainability challenge under Section 34 SARFAESI Act without prejudice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI Order VII Rule 11 CPC forgery of signatures

Pawan Kumar Sharma v. Om Prakash Sharma

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8276

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint discloses a cause of action for partition of jointly owned properties and is not barred by law.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action Hindu Undivided Family partition suit

M/S MAGNA YUMA PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8267

The Delhi High Court held that Lithium-ion batteries owned by a petitioner leasing them to E-rickshaw owners must be returned despite vehicle seizure, subject to conditions ensuring compliance with registration and fitness norms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Lithium-ion batteries E-rickshaw Battery leasing Ownership rights

Union of India & Ors. v. JC-805086 P Ex NB Sub Kuldip Singh, Retd

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2018
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for hearing loss, affirming the presumption that disabilities not present at entry are service-attributable unless rebutted by positive medical evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces presumption of attributability Medical Board opinion