Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
Ernst and Young Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Division-Vasant Kunj & Anr.
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for computation of interest on delayed GST refunds in accordance with Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act, clarifying entitlement to 6% and 9% interest rates depending on the refund application stage and procedural delays.
M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEAR IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals restoring them before CESTAT for merits, holding that DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.
Priti Saraf v. Ajay Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction decree against the wife residing in the shared household, holding she lacked independent locus to contest the suit and that domestic violence disputes do not affect landlord's right to possession.
VRG Electronics Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 7
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax returns due to accountant's inadvertence, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and liberal construction of 'genuine hardship' under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.
Udit Goyal v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 12
The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax return due to COVID-19 hardships, directing fresh consideration with reasoned application of Section 119(2)(b) powers.
All India Kataria Education Society v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2 Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer retains jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act despite the faceless assessment scheme.
Deepak Yadav v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 506, 451, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Sandeep Srivastava & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.
Naman Jain @ Shanu & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a theft-related FIR and criminal proceedings based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Singhania University v. University Grants Commission
The Delhi High Court quashed UGC's order debarring Singhania University from enrolling Ph.D. scholars for five years, holding that UGC lacked express statutory power to impose such penalty and principles of natural justice were not violated.
Heena Kausar v. MCD
The Delhi High Court upheld the MCD's authority to demolish only declared dangerous portions of a building while preserving tenants' occupation rights in safe areas and allowing further inspection for repairs or demolition.
Amber Bawa v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition to enforce prior orders for de-sealing property is maintainable and directed the petitioner to comply with MCD requirements for de-sealing.
Satish Kumar & Anr. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition to petitioners due to improper service of notices and allowed them to file an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, MCD.
Raju Sunar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of repeated penetrative sexual assault charges under the POCSO Act due to contradictions in child witness testimonies and lack of corroborative medical evidence, emphasizing the need to establish foundational facts before invoking statutory presumptions.
Ajay @ Bobby v. State
The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's 20-year sentence for aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act pending appeal, emphasizing the exceptional nature of suspension of sentence and the strength of scientific evidence supporting conviction.
Sh. Kewal Krishan v. Sh. Gulshan Kumar & Ors.
The High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to condone delay in filing the Written Statement beyond 90 days under Order VIII Rule 1 CPC, holding that delay due to obtaining certified copies from another litigation is not an exceptional circumstance.
Budh Bhaskar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for attempt to murder but modified the robbery conviction to theft and reduced the sentence considering mitigating factors.
Sardul Singh v. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that pendente lite and future interest can only be awarded on the principal sum and not on pre-suit interest, dismissing the appeal against the execution court's order limiting interest accordingly.
Zameer Ahmad & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Sony India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding the ITAT's order allowing depreciation on block of assets basis and rejecting additional AMP benchmarking adjustments in Sony India's transfer pricing dispute.