Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Ramesh @Rameshwar Lohra v. State of NCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8110
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court suspended the appellant's sentence in a rape case pending appeal, holding that the victim's age determination affects applicability of POCSO presumptions and that the conviction's sustainability requires prima facie assessment without reappreciation of evidence.

criminal sentence_modified Significant POCSO Act ossification test age determination sexual assault

M/S TRAVEL CORPORATION INDIA LTD. v. SHRI CHANDRA PRAKASH TIWARI

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8237
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed a workman's application under Section 17-B of the Industrial Disputes Act, directing payment of wages during the pendency of proceedings challenging his reinstatement, holding that delay in filing does not bar entitlement if the workman remains unemployed.

labor petition_allowed Significant Section 17-B Industrial Disputes Act wages during pendency reinstatement unemployment

M/S ADIGEAR INTERNATIONAL & ORS. v. M/S ANJ ENTERPRISES

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8236

The High Court held that revision under Section 115 CPC is not maintainable against interlocutory orders that do not finally dispose of the suit, dismissing the petition accordingly.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision jurisdiction interlocutory order Order VIII Rule 9 CPC

Amit Sethi v. Lalit Sethi & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8224

The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's partition suit for lack of cause of action, holding that under Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, a grandson whose father is alive has no birthright in his grandfather's property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 8 HSA Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action

Bharat Singh Kushwah and Ors v. Manoj Sharma and Anr

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8190-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of ex-parte injunction and directed the Commercial Court to expedite hearing and disposal of the interlocutory application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural ex-parte ad interim injunction Local Commissioner Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interlocutory application

Vishal Kumar Mehra v. University of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8209

The Delhi High Court held that withdrawal of nomination by WhatsApp message was invalid as per election rules, dismissing the petition and upholding rejection of the petitioner’s nominations for multiple posts.

administrative petition_dismissed withdrawal of nomination students union election election procedure validity of withdrawal

M/S SOPAN RESTAURANT v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8207

The Delhi High Court granted a seven-month extension of the petitioner’s license to operate a stall at New Delhi Railway Station, applying the principle of parity with similar cases and subject to payment of license fees and an undertaking to vacate thereafter.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant license extension status quo parity principle speaking order

Om Veer @ Ombir v. Delhi Cantonment Board

15 Sep 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8208

The Delhi High Court held that no coercive action can be taken against unauthorized construction during the pendency of an appeal under the Cantonments Act, directing maintenance of status quo and expeditious disposal of appeals.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Cantonments Act 2006 unauthorized construction demolition orders appeal pendency

Sandeep K L v. Union of India

15 Sep 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8205-DB
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate acquitted of criminal charges and who truthfully discloses such past involvement cannot be disqualified from appointment to a disciplined force without individualized assessment of the offence and antecedents.

administrative petition_allowed Significant acquittal criminal antecedents disqualification disciplinary force recruitment

Ram Bhajan Yadav v. Delhi Transco Ltd. & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8204
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging cancellation of a provisional appointment due to failure to establish requisite professional experience as per eligibility criteria.

administrative petition_dismissed provisional appointment professional experience Junior Engineer (Civil) eligibility criteria

Ernst and Young Limited v. Assistant Commissioner, Division-Vasant Kunj & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8158-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for computation of interest on delayed GST refunds in accordance with Sections 54 and 56 of the CGST Act, clarifying entitlement to 6% and 9% interest rates depending on the refund application stage and procedural delays.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 refund interest Section 54 CGST Section 56 CGST

M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEAR IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8147-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed appeals restoring them before CESTAT for merits, holding that DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 28 Section 130 proper officer

Priti Saraf v. Ajay Sharma & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:8177

The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction decree against the wife residing in the shared household, holding she lacked independent locus to contest the suit and that domestic violence disputes do not affect landlord's right to possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant eviction proceedings shared household locus standi impleadment

VRG Electronics Pvt Ltd v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 7

15 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8064-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax returns due to accountant's inadvertence, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and liberal construction of 'genuine hardship' under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay genuine hardship negligence of accountant

Udit Goyal v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi 12

15 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8063-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax return due to COVID-19 hardships, directing fresh consideration with reasoned application of Section 119(2)(b) powers.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay Income Tax Return filing genuine hardship

All India Kataria Education Society v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 2 Delhi & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8126-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer retains jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act despite the faceless assessment scheme.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Jurisdictional Assessing Officer Faceless Assessing Officer Reassessment proceedings Section 147 Income Tax Act

Deepak Yadav v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr

15 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8113

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 506, 451, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Sandeep Srivastava & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8112

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process in matrimonial disputes.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Naman Jain @ Shanu & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

15 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8111

The Delhi High Court quashed a theft-related FIR and criminal proceedings based on a voluntary amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Singhania University v. University Grants Commission

15 Sep 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8102

The Delhi High Court quashed UGC's order debarring Singhania University from enrolling Ph.D. scholars for five years, holding that UGC lacked express statutory power to impose such penalty and principles of natural justice were not violated.

administrative petition_allowed Significant University Grants Commission Act, 1956 Ph.D. Regulations natural justice ultra vires