Delhi High Court

59,406 judgments

Year:

State v. Vipin Bansal

15 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8650

The High Court dismissed the State's appeal against acquittal in a rape and kidnapping case, affirming that inconclusive evidence and contradictions in the prosecutrix's testimony warranted upholding the trial court's judgment.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal double presumption of innocence rape kidnapping

Dr Vivek Singh v. Shriram Finance Ltd and Ors

15 Sep 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8577-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DRT orders under the SARFAESI Act, holding that the petitioner must exhaust the statutory appellate remedy under Section 18 before invoking writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 17 SARFAESI Section 18 SARFAESI writ jurisdiction

Rajeev Kumar Talreja & Anr. v. Concept Capital Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd

15 Sep 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 3022
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the arbitrator accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 21 Arbitration agreement

National Federation of Tourism and Transport Cooperatives of India Limited v. Hindustan Labour Multistate Cooperative Society Limited

15 Sep 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:8519

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award for non-compliance with mandatory disclosure under section 12 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and appointed a new arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute afresh.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure Arbitral award Void ab initio

Ashok Kinra v. Central Cottage Industries Corporation

15 Sep 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:8413-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a writ order directing reimbursement of withheld medical claim amounts from terminal benefits, holding a signed undertaking valid and denying interest or compensation due to delay.

civil appeal_dismissed medical reimbursement terminal benefits undertaking insurance claim

Genesis Enterprises v. Principal Commissioner CGST Delhi East

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8376-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court upheld the lawful exercise of search and seizure powers under Section 67 of the CGST Act against the Gumber family, while safeguarding privacy rights and procedural fairness during the ongoing GST investigation.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 67 CGST Act search and seizure reasons to believe right to privacy

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD v. MD. ISHAQ

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8362

The Delhi High Court approved the amicable settlement between the parties, directing release of deposited funds to the respondent as full and final settlement and disposing of the petition.

civil petition_allowed settlement release of deposited funds full and final settlement court registry

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. GOPAL BHARDWAJ

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8361

The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil petition directing release of deposited funds to the respondent as full and final settlement, binding the parties to their amicable agreement.

civil petition_allowed settlement court registry deposit interest on deposit final settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. SUJIT KUMAR

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8360

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement between parties, directing release of deposited funds with interest to the respondent as full and final settlement, and disposal of the petition.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement monetary claims court registry deposit interest on deposit

State (Govt of NCT) v. Mikael C Williams

15 Sep 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8355
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of an accused in a rape case, holding that consent obtained in a long-term live-in relationship is presumed valid unless a false promise of marriage was made with mala fide intent at the outset.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant consent false promise of marriage live-in relationship rape

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS PVT LTD v. MANOJ BISHT

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8354
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court recorded an amicable settlement between parties, directed release of deposited funds including interest to the respondent, and disposed of the petition accordingly.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement release of deposited funds Court Registry final settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. HARI KISHAN

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8353

The Delhi High Court directed release of settlement amount deposited with the Court Registry to the respondent, holding the parties bound by their amicable settlement.

civil petition_allowed settlement release of funds court registry binding settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. BHUWAN CHAND JOSHI

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8352

The Delhi High Court approved an amicable settlement between parties, directing release of deposited funds as full and final settlement, thereby disposing of the petition.

civil petition_allowed settlement deposit with court registry full and final settlement release of funds

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. KAILASH CHAND

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8350

The Delhi High Court approved an amicable settlement directing release of deposited funds to the respondents as full and final settlement, binding the parties accordingly.

civil petition_allowed amicable settlement release of funds court registry deposit final settlement

M/S AMAZON DISTRIBUTORS (P) LTD. v. DIWAKAR SINGH

15 Sep 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8349

The Delhi High Court directed release of court-deposited funds in accordance with an amicable settlement, holding the respondent bound by the acceptance of the final settlement amount.

civil petition_allowed settlement release of court deposit final settlement binding statement of counsel

Mukesh Thakur v. GNCT of Delhi

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8303-DB

The Delhi High Court held that promotion granted under existing Recruitment Rules cannot be invalidated by unpromulgated draft rules and directed reconsideration of pay protection and past service benefits accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Recruitment Rules 1967 pay protection counting of past service draft Recruitment Rules

UOI & Anr. v. Sunder

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8302-DB

The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with the Tribunal's order directing appointment with relaxed educational qualifications after the order was implemented and the respondent retired.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal relaxation of educational qualification Sanitary Safaiwala Article 226

Movers International Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8157-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a 16-day delay in filing a CGST appeal due to pendency of a rectification application constitutes sufficient cause for condonation of delay under Section 107(4) of the CGST Act and restored the appeal for hearing on merits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CGST Act, 2017 Section 107 condonation of delay sufficient cause

Chadchaporn Thankrathok v. The Commissioner of Customs

15 Sep 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8155-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal against the Customs Order-in-Original passed without Show Cause Notice, directing a personal hearing and consideration of merits by the Appellate Authority.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Order-in-Original Appeal

Union of India & Ors. v. Har Sai

15 Sep 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8253-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting upgraded pay scale benefits to a Statistical Assistant appointed through direct recruitment despite recruitment rules allowing deputation, clarifying that pay scale upgradation is not limited to posts filled exclusively by direct recruitment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant 5th Central Pay Commission upgraded pay scale Statistical Assistant direct recruitment