Delhi High Court
59,406 judgments
M/S RST Batteries & Anr. v. Directorate General of Goods and Service Tax Intelligence Gurugram Zonal Unit & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a CGST demand for fraudulent ITC, directing the petitioners to pursue statutory appellate remedies under Section 107 of the CGST Act.
SHES AIR AND AUTOMATION v. AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes, leaving issues of limitation and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
MRVS VALUE STRAIGHT PVT. LTD. v. BRIGHTSTAR RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and leaving validity and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
Tanveer Zaki v. Anand Prakash Dube
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's order granting retrospective MACP benefits to an employee redeployed from Lino Operator to Offset Machine Man, affirming consistent judicial precedents and principles of non-discrimination.
91 Springboard Business Hub Private Limited v. RCPL Logistics Private Limited
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court's role is limited to prima facie satisfaction of the existence of an arbitration agreement and directed appointment of an arbitrator accordingly.
Axis Finance Limited v. Laxman Pralhad Chavan & Pushpa Laxman Chavan
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act after prima facie finding of an arbitration agreement, emphasizing limited judicial scrutiny and deferring substantive issues to the arbitral tribunal.
Axis Finance Limited v. Nitin Negi
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court’s role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving substantive disputes to arbitration.
M/S IG PETROCHEMICALS LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging amendments to the Customs Tariff Act as infructuous since the amendments had not come into force due to lack of government notification.
M/S KANTA FOOD PRODUCT v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(2) of the CGST Act cannot continue beyond one year and set aside the attachment accordingly.
M/S SAP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT) NEW CUSTOMS HOUSE, NEAR IGI AIRPORT, NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals restoring them to CESTAT for merits adjudication, holding that DRI officials are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act as per the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.
M/S MICROSOFT CORPORATION (INDIA) PRIVATE LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (IMPORT)
The Delhi High Court allowed appeals challenging CESTAT orders, holding that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, and restored the appeals for merits adjudication following the Supreme Court's ruling in Canon-II.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. Casio India Company Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals upholding that AMP expenses do not constitute an international transaction requiring transfer pricing adjustments under the 'Bright Line Test', following established precedent.
MS Chetak Motors Pvt Ltd and Ors v. Additional Commissioner (Anti-Evasion) CGST, Delhi South Commissionerate & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the invocation of Section 74 CGST Act for wilful suppression of GST liabilities, directing supply of relied upon documents and fair adjudication, while dismissing the writ petition at the threshold.
M/S Eros Resorts & Hotel Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of property tax classification and rates imposed on star-rated hotels by the MCD under the DMC Act, affirming the reasonableness of the MVC's recommendations and rejecting challenges to the use of star ratings and inclusion of basements in tax calculations.
Aadil & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 135 of the Indian Electricity Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Anil Shekhawat v. Director General Border Security Force
The Delhi High Court directed the Director General of BSF to decide the petitioner's post confirmation petition within six weeks, emphasizing the obligation of administrative authorities to decide duly received petitions within a reasonable time.
Union of India & Ors. v. Capt. (In) Roy Joseph (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that diseases arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by the employer.
Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Po Log Ashok Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's discretionary refusal to grant leave to appeal to the Supreme Court under Section 31(1) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.
Satish Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representation within four weeks by a reasoned order, reserving the petitioner's right to challenge the decision thereafter.
Zeeshan Vasim Hashmi v. Apeirogon Technologies Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the commercial appeal with liberty to pursue other legal remedies and dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.