Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

G.N.G. Auto Aids Pvt Ltd v. Just Funky India Trading Pvt Ltd

10 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9198

The Delhi High Court held it has territorial jurisdiction to appoint an arbitrator under a lease deed arbitration clause designating New Delhi/Gurgaon as the seat of arbitration, overruling the respondent's jurisdictional objection.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause seat of arbitration territorial jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration Act

SH BALBIR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9087-DB

The Delhi High Court directed re-fixation of petitioners' pension based on revised pay and ordered payment release within six weeks, allowing revival of petitions if grievances persist.

administrative petition_allowed pension fixation pay fixation writ petition re-fixation of pension

Mahesh Shrivastva @ Jeeva v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

10 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9184

The Delhi High Court quashed a mechanically passed externment order against the petitioner for lack of cogent evidence and procedural fairness, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial review and protection of fundamental rights.

criminal petition_allowed Significant externment order Section 47 Delhi Police Act judicial review due process

Employees State Insurance Corporation & Ors. v. Vinod Kumar

10 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9180-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order treating the period between dismissal and acquittal as service for notional benefits upon acquittal after full trial, rejecting the petitioners’ claim of discretion to treat it as dies non.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant acquittal reinstatement notional benefits dies non

Ashwin Murli v. Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd

10 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:9146-DB

The Delhi High Court held that vacancies reserved for Persons with Benchmark Disability are carried forward for up to two recruitment years before lapsing, and filling such vacancies with non-PwBD candidates in subsequent years does not reduce overall reservation rights.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Persons with Benchmark Disability PwBD reservation carried forward vacancies reservation lapse

State v. Amit Gautam

10 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9171
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a five-year sentence under Section 304 Part II IPC for non-premeditated matricide, emphasizing proportionality and balancing mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304 Part II IPC sentencing principles culpable homicide matricide

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi v. M/s Amadeus India Pvt. Ltd.

10 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar V. Kameswar Rao · 2025:DHC:9032-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order deleting disallowance under Section 14A for AY 2018-19, holding the 2022 amendment to Section 14A is prospective and does not apply retrospectively.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Finance Act 2022 amendment retrospective amendment transfer pricing adjustment

ICMR - National Institute of Cancer Prevention and Research v. Rajani Yadav & Ors.

10 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9111-DB

The High Court set aside the Tribunal's order revising respondents' salary without hearing the petitioner and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording opportunity to respond.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal Natural Justice Salary Revision National Cancer Registry Program

M/S IMS Mercantiles Ltd v. Union of India & Anr.

10 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9069-DB

The Delhi High Court held that GST demand and pre-deposit must be calculated on turnover related to disputed goods, relegating the petitioner to appellate remedy against the impugned tax order.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST tax evasion misclassification HSN Code

FOSUN PHARMA INDUSTRIAL PTE. LTD v. ASSISTANT/ DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR.

10 Oct 2025 · V. KAMESWAR RAO; VINOD KUMAR · 2025:DHC:9015-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2019-20 and remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration upon submission of supporting documents by the petitioner.

tax appeal_allowed Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(1) Section 148A(3)

Delhi Development Authority v. Ziaul Haque & Ors.

10 Oct 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9125-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the entitlement of JJ cluster residents to rehabilitation under the 2004 DDA policy despite allegations of commercial use, emphasizing verified residential status and insufficient evidence of hazardous activities.

property appeal_dismissed Significant DDA Rehabilitation Policy 2004 Jhuggi Jhopdi cluster rehabilitation eligibility commercial use

Shikhar Prasad v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9112-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that a person with only one testis due to prior orchidectomy is disqualified under CAPF medical guidelines and that the precedent for cured ailments does not apply to permanent conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed medical guidelines CAPF eligibility orchidectomy one testis

Nirmala Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9086-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the widow of a CRPF Sub-Inspector is entitled to Extraordinary Pension as the death was attributable to service-related ailments despite pre-existing alcoholic liver disease.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Extraordinary Pension Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules, 1939 attributability of death pre-existing disease

Government of J and K & Anr. v. Dr. Rajinder Kumar Trisal

10 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9123-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld retrospective time bound promotions and monetary benefits for migrant doctors of Jammu & Kashmir, emphasizing the State's duty to extend court-granted reliefs to all similarly placed employees without discrimination.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant time bound promotion retrospective promotion monetary benefits similarly placed employees

Anand, Advs v. State (NCT of Delhi)

10 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9104
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner's application for preservation of call detail records and location charts at the pre-charge stage under Section 94 BNSS, distinguishing preservation from production and emphasizing the necessity to prevent loss of critical evidence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 94 BNSS, 2023 preservation of evidence Call Detail Records location charts

Elxir Trading Pvt. Ltd v. Kent RO Systems Ltd

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9077-DB

The Delhi High Court corrected a clerical error in its order to accurately record counsel's appearance for the appellant in a commercial appeal.

civil other Procedural correction of order appearance of counsel corrigendum court order

Union of India and Ors v. Ex Sgt Nitesh Kumar

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of sound health at entry and the employer's burden to disprove service connection.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Union of India & Ors. v. MWO Kishore Kumar (Retd)

10 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9078-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless rebutted by positive evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension primary hypertension armed forces Release Medical Board

Ambedkhar Ganguly Student House for Women University of Delhi & Anr. v. Anilyadav

10 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9107

The Delhi High Court approved a Settlement Agreement resolving a labour dispute and directed payment and release of amounts deposited in Court, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.

labour petition_allowed Settlement Agreement Labour Court Award Article 226 Article 227

Rakesh Sharma v. Vikram Saraswat

10 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9106

The High Court dismissed the revision petition under Section 115 CPC challenging an interim order in execution proceedings, holding that such orders are not maintainable unless they finally dispose of the lis.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 115 CPC revision petition execution proceedings interim order