Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
The Chairman Central Board of Secondary Education v. Shri S P Rana
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing release of gratuity amounts between parties by mutual consent without prejudice to their rights in ongoing departmental inquiry proceedings.
Sumit Sharma v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition setting aside cancellation of army candidature where the alleged fabricated domicile certificate issue was not conclusively established and a genuine certificate was produced.
Zahid Khan & Anr. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 308 IPC but modified sentences to probation, emphasizing judicial discretion and reformative justice under the Probation of Offenders Act.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Shyam Dulari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's delayed petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal of respondents due to insufficient prima facie case and material discrepancies in prosecution evidence.
M/S Rajesh Metals v. Office of the Commissioner CGST Delhi North
The Delhi High Court held that writ jurisdiction is generally not maintainable in fraudulent ITC cases where an alternate statutory remedy exists, but permitted the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit due to possible non-consideration of its reply.
Future Consumer Limited v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a GST order accompanied by DRC-07 is valid despite lacking signature, but rectification orders adversely affecting a party require a personal hearing under Section 161 of the CGST Act, 2017.
M/S Aviraj Udyog v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST demand order for lack of proper notice and opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication pending Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related notifications.
Enviro Tech Ventures Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
Delhi High Court directed petitioner to file appeal against GST adjudication order, leaving validity of extension notifications to Supreme Court's decision.
Lal Mohammad v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Court held that a major missing person’s autonomous choice to reside with her husband must be respected, and no further custody order is warranted in a Habeas Corpus petition filed by her parent.
Trushtima Sharma v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The court dismissed the Habeas Corpus petition after the alleged detainee appeared in person and denied illegal detention, holding no further relief was warranted.
Priya Narayanan & Ors. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that a prompt in-house enquiry causing brief delay does not attract penal liability under Section 21 of the POCSO Act and quashed charges framed against school authorities for failure to report the offence.
Nishant Mukul v. Nischal Aggarwal
The Delhi High Court held that a director who was in charge at the time of issuance of dishonored cheques can be held liable under Section 138/141 NI Act, and pre-trial quashing is inappropriate absent unimpeachable evidence.
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan v. Geetanjali Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing appointment of a candidate excluded due to a minor technical error in the application form, emphasizing that trivial mistakes not affecting substantive eligibility should not bar selection.
Himanshu Yadav and Anr. v. A.I.I.M.S & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld rejection of candidates' OBC-NCL certificates issued outside the prescribed validity period, affirming strict adherence to recruitment advertisement conditions for reservation eligibility.
Sh. Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition of a daily wager with over eleven years of continuous service, directing his regularisation as a one-time measure under the principles of Umadevi and Article 14 fairness.
Sushma Sahni v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh. Rishant Sadh & Ors. v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Anirudh Dawar & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 377, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Krishan Kumar Vats v. Shobha Ram Vats & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the suit property is the individual property of Defendant No. 1 and not joint Hindu family property, rejecting the Plaintiff's partition suit and upholding the validity of the gift deed and will executed by Defendant No. 1.
Divyanshu Kalra & Ors. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.