Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Major Gaurav Sheoran Retd

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9014-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired officer who resigned but suffered a service-attributable disability, distinguishing it from voluntary retirement cases barred under Regulation 50.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension resignation voluntary retirement Army Pension Regulations

Soniya v. Union of India and Ors

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9009-DB

The Delhi High Court held that execution of a maintenance order cannot be sought by a writ petition under Article 226 and must be pursued through execution proceedings.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition Article 226 maintenance order execution proceedings

Eagle Hunter Solutions Ltd v. Kuldeep Chaturvedi

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9108

The Delhi High Court set aside a labor tribunal award for lack of reasons and improper back wages grant, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication with directions to file pleadings and evidence.

labor appeal_allowed Significant reinstatement back wages quasi-judicial reasons denial of justice

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Meenu Chawla & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9103

The Delhi High Court held that absence of a valid permit for Delhi does not constitute a fundamental breach of the insurance policy, dismissing the insurer's appeal and upholding compensation awarded for a fatal motor accident.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permit conditions insurance recovery rights fundamental breach

Rahul Kumar & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9028-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' request without adjudicating the merits.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal as withdrawn petitioners

Samarendra, Advs v. Government of NCT of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9029-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition to enable the petitioner to pursue the matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal, affirming the CAT’s exclusive jurisdiction over service matters.

administrative petition_allowed Central Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition service matters

M/S MOMS CRADLE PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9065-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of delay in filing a statutory appeal under the CGST Act, holding that the limitation period is strict and refund can be adjusted against the demand raised for fraudulent ITC.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant CGST Act 2017 Section 107 appeal limitation condonation of delay

Neetu Suri v. Rajesh Malik & Anr.

09 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9088

The Delhi High Court held that defendants against whom specific allegations of fraudulent share transfers are made cannot be deleted from the suit under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC, affirming their status as necessary and proper parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 1 Rule 10 CPC necessary party proper party deletion of parties

Dr. Rupali Mishra v. Dr. Mannan Gupta

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9005-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court permitted the appellants to withdraw their appeal without expressing any opinion on the merits and disposed of the appeal accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal modification of order vacation of order

Rakesh Kumar Shrivastava v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9011-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner informed that his grievance had been resolved.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal grievance resolved disposal as withdrawn

Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. Union of India

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9055-DB

The Delhi High Court directed strict enforcement of DGFT's Minimum Import Price notifications on Soda Ash imports, dismissing the petition after confirming compliance by Customs authorities.

administrative petition_dismissed Minimum Import Price Soda Ash DGFT Notification Customs enforcement

Naseem Ahmed v. Deepak Singh

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8924-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Commercial Court's jurisdiction and summary decree for possession in a commercial tenancy dispute, affirming that suit valuation based on prevailing market rent is valid and a tenant cannot challenge landlord's title while in possession.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Court jurisdiction Pecuniary jurisdiction Order XII Rule 6 CPC Landlord-tenant relationship

Rajwanti Deshwal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9063

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner’s property due to disputed service of notices and absence of a Presiding Officer in the appellate tribunal, allowing time to file an appeal.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Dass Paper Mart v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9062

The Delhi High Court granted temporary de-sealing of business premises sealed without prior notice, directing the petitioner to file an appeal and emphasizing adherence to natural justice.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sealing Order Principles of Natural Justice Show Cause Notice Factory License

Manauvar Ali v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9061

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant a seven-month extension to a catering licensee affected by COVID-19, emphasizing uniformity of Railway policy and parity with similarly placed petitioners.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways Commercial Circular No. 20/2017

Arun Kumar Saini v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9060

Delhi High Court granted interim protection restraining MCD from coercive demolition action pending hearing of a statutory appeal before a non-functional Appellate Tribunal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant statutory appeal demolition order interim protection municipal corporation

ARTI ENTERPRISES v. Union of India & Ors.

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9068
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction to grant a seven-month extension to petitioner’s Indian Railways catering licenses, aligning with prior relief granted to similarly placed parties under uniform Railway policy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways Catering Policy license extension

Sayra v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9059

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking demolition of illegal construction as not maintainable due to a pending civil suit and directed the MCD to grant a hearing before any demolition.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition illegal construction demolition order abuse of process

Hitesh Kumar v. University of Delhi

09 Oct 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9054

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the University of Delhi's admission notification process, holding that candidates must vigilantly check all official website notifications and relief cannot be granted after admission closure.

administrative petition_dismissed admission notification University of Delhi PG Admission CUET PG Examination

M/S WELCUT INDUSTRIES v. COMMISSIONER, CGST, DELHI, NORTH COMMISSIONERATE

09 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9000-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to deposit 10% of the GST demand as pre-deposit to stay recovery proceedings pending the functioning of the GST Appellate Tribunal and permitted filing of appeal thereafter.

tax petition_allowed Significant CGST Act Section 112 pre-deposit stay of recovery