Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Ghulam Hasnain v. MCD & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging construction on disputed property for lack of ownership proof and directed the MCD to ensure compliance with building bye-laws.
Sunil Sharma v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that parole for a POCSO convict to file a Special Leave Petition is a special circumstance warranting discretionary grant of parole, and rejected mechanical denials based on prison rules and availability of legal aid inside jail.
M/S Surge Industries Ltd v. Kamal Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld a summary decree under Order XXXVII CPC where defendants failed to furnish security as a condition for leave to defend in a suit based on dishonoured cheques.
Yunus Khan v. State of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed continued police efforts and periodic reporting to trace the petitioner's missing son and apprehend the suspect, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Karishma Oberoi v. Ajay Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC solely for non-pleading of particulars of fraud if it discloses a cause of action, and restored the plaint challenging the validity of a Sale Deed executed without authority.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Mohd. Anas
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall a prosecution witness to clarify a minor discrepancy in testimony, holding that contradictions between witnesses do not justify recalling after prosecution evidence is closed.
Manoj Rai v. The State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of life sentence during appeal, holding that voluntary confession corroborated by independent evidence negates the need for suspension in a grave offence.
Rajia @ Sabbo v. State Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court suspended the life sentence of a woman convicted of murder during the pendency of her appeal, considering her prolonged incarceration, lack of direct evidence, and humanitarian grounds.
Vinod Gupta v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence and bail during appeal, upholding the conviction based on credible dying declaration and corroborative evidence under Section 302 IPC.
Urmila Devi v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition after the missing daughter was produced before the Court and expressed her wish to return to her mother, negating claims of unlawful detention.
Sumant Batra v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an economic offence case based on parity with co-accused, absence of direct incriminating evidence, and completion of investigation.
Dharmender Verma & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Amit Kapania and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
DELHI KI GALIYAN NGO v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed fraudulently in the name of an NGO, imposed costs on the unauthorized petitioner, and directed police investigation for misuse of the judicial process.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. M. Bathla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants infringed plaintiff's Indian Patent No. 175971 relating to digital audio compression in VCDs, granting permanent injunction and damages while rejecting defendants' non-joinder and invalidity defenses.
Vishal Yadav & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Ram Krishan Singh @ Dadu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction under POCSO, setting aside charges of penetrative assault due to contradictions but upheld conviction for sexual assault by inappropriate touching, directing his release after considering time served.
Sabu Trade Private Limited v. Rajkumar Sabu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction in favor of the registered proprietor Rajkumar Sabu over the trade mark 'SACHAMOTI', rejecting appellants' claims of prior use and ownership.
Sh Dinesh Singhal alias Sindhal v. Deepak Jain & Anr.
The High Court held that Sections 347B and 347E of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act do not bar civil suits for injunction and damages due to unauthorized construction and upheld dismissal of the petition challenging the plaint's maintainability.
Sandeep Kumar v. Nihal Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, holding that the landlord's bona fide requirement was established and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue for leave to defend.