Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Union of India and Ors. v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order directing promotion, holding that subsequent departmental proceedings do not justify review and emphasizing the duty of full disclosure in judicial proceedings.
Ramesh Chand v. MCD
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action on the petitioner’s property pending hearing of his appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, without adjudicating the merits of the Show Cause Notice.
Rachna Bansal & Ors. v. Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD and Delhi Jal Board to take lawful action against encroachments on public land while ensuring due process and hearing before the Religious Committee, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Party for the Rights of Other Backward Classes v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Election Commission of India to complete the verification and registration of a political party within six weeks to enable timely participation in upcoming elections.
M/S OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LTD v. M/S ASHIANA MANUFACTURING INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award by consent of parties and remanded the dispute to a fresh arbitrator with directions, affirming the Court's power to do so under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Engineers India Limited & Anr. v. MS Shivhare Road Lines
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a material handling contract dispute, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Tani Sandhu Bhargava v. Shumita Didi Sandhu
The Delhi High Court held that summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is discretionary and inappropriate where substantial disputes exist, setting aside decrees based on admissions and restoring suits for regular trial.
Praveen Begum & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Court held that a major daughter has the right to choose her residence and refused to order her return to her parents in a Habeas Corpus petition.
Sitaram Barwal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that petitioners are entitled to grade pay of ₹5400 after four years in ₹4800 grade pay and directed re-fixation of pay and arrears accordingly.
BIMA SUGAM INDIA FEDERATION v. A RANGE GOWDA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff, backed by IRDAI's public announcements, is the prior user of the 'BIMA SUGAM' mark and granted interim mandatory injunction directing transfer of disputed domain names from Defendant No. 1, who acted in bad faith and engaged in cybersquatting.
Ram Jeevan Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that regularization applications must be considered by MCD without adjudicating pending title disputes, which are to be resolved in civil court, and declined to interfere with the property pending the suit.
Sh. Kuldeep Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition and vacation of property pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the need for natural justice and fair hearing.
Union of India & Ors. v. 622830 MWO Achyutanand Rai (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service absent contrary proof.
Union of India v. M/s UEE Electricals Engineers Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, set aside the dismissal of the Section 34 petition for summary rejection without merit consideration, condoned delay, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the challenged claims.
Sanjay @ Sanjeev @ Baba v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to substantial doubts in the prosecution's police-only evidence and procedural lapses in a case of alleged illegal weapon possession and firing at police.
Shri Mangal Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture proceedings under SAFEM FOP Act require a valid nexus between illegal activities and properties, and quashed forfeiture orders lacking such nexus.
Prakash Singh v. Union of India and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a retired IPS officer's petition seeking reimbursement for emergency medical treatment abroad, holding that existing rules and policies exclude pensioners from such benefits under CS (MA) Rules and CGHS.
Lokesh Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that Rule 42(a) of the BSF Rules does not bar disciplinary proceedings against a BSF personnel for facilitation or omission absent conspiracy with persons outside the force, and dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal order.
Madhawendra Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The High Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh after the petitioner exhausts the remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal.
Suneel Rawat v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the medical board’s decision disqualifying a candidate with a benign solitary pulmonary nodule from recruitment as Sub-Inspector, refusing to interfere absent arbitrariness.