Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Rahul @ Bhupinder Verma v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant holding that vague testimony of "physical relations" without clarification or supporting evidence is insufficient to prove penetrative sexual assault under POCSO and IPC.
Agrawal Infrabuild Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI's discretionary power to annul a tender process without assigning reasons, dismissing the petitioner’s claim to be declared lowest bidder after extrication of the declared lowest bidder.
Kundan Singh Negi v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and related charges, holding that the prosecution failed to prove non-consent beyond reasonable doubt in a case involving a prolonged consensual relationship.
Ansh Thadani & Ors. v. The State of NCT Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Mukul Punyani & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Gurmeet Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Laksh Mirchandani & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Rita Raj v. Pabitra Roy Chaudhuri
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's decree dissolving marriage on grounds of mental cruelty, rejecting the appellant's plea of condonation and claim for permanent alimony.
M/S CONNOISSEUR BUILDTECH PVT. LTD. v. OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR OF M/S. CONNOISSEUR BUILDTECH PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the liability of a company under winding up to bear security expenses incurred by the Official Liquidator based on undisputed statutory disclosures and unchallenged court orders, dismissing the company's belated claim of non-ownership of the property.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS v. SH. RAJENDRA SINGH RAWAT
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of a tampered APAR, emphasizing the sanctity of objective service records and dismissing the Government's delayed writ petition.
Union of India and Ors. v. Sameer Dnyandev Wankhede
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging its earlier order directing promotion, holding that subsequent departmental proceedings do not justify review and emphasizing the duty of full disclosure in judicial proceedings.
Ramesh Chand v. MCD
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against coercive action on the petitioner’s property pending hearing of his appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, without adjudicating the merits of the Show Cause Notice.
Rachna Bansal & Ors. v. Commissioner of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD and Delhi Jal Board to take lawful action against encroachments on public land while ensuring due process and hearing before the Religious Committee, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Party for the Rights of Other Backward Classes v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Election Commission of India to complete the verification and registration of a political party within six weeks to enable timely participation in upcoming elections.
M/S OYO HOTELS AND HOMES PRIVATE LTD v. M/S ASHIANA MANUFACTURING INDIA LTD
The Delhi High Court set aside the arbitral award by consent of parties and remanded the dispute to a fresh arbitrator with directions, affirming the Court's power to do so under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Engineers India Limited & Anr. v. MS Shivhare Road Lines
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a material handling contract dispute, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Tani Sandhu Bhargava v. Shumita Didi Sandhu
The Delhi High Court held that summary judgment under Order XII Rule 6 CPC is discretionary and inappropriate where substantial disputes exist, setting aside decrees based on admissions and restoring suits for regular trial.
Praveen Begum & Anr. v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Court held that a major daughter has the right to choose her residence and refused to order her return to her parents in a Habeas Corpus petition.
Sitaram Barwal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that petitioners are entitled to grade pay of ₹5400 after four years in ₹4800 grade pay and directed re-fixation of pay and arrears accordingly.
BIMA SUGAM INDIA FEDERATION v. A RANGE GOWDA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff, backed by IRDAI's public announcements, is the prior user of the 'BIMA SUGAM' mark and granted interim mandatory injunction directing transfer of disputed domain names from Defendant No. 1, who acted in bad faith and engaged in cybersquatting.