Delhi High Court
103,150 judgments
Union of India v. Z CDR NS Dhami
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for primary hypertension, affirming that the burden to disprove service connection lies on the armed forces and that Medical Boards must provide cogent reasons when denying pension.
Genius Electrical and Electronics Pvt. Ltd. v. Servotech Power System Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused condonation of a 914-day delay in filing against the rejection of a commercial suit for non-payment of court fees, emphasizing the appellant's lack of due diligence and the non-appealability of the recall order.
Union of India & Ors. v. 711829 Ex Sgt Rajkumar Baburao Nanaware
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman under the 2008 Entitlement Rules, holding that the administration bears the burden to prove non-attributability of disability to military service and that mere idiopathic classification by the Medical Board is insufficient to deny pension.
Wilhelmsen Ships Service AS v. Vishal Anand Trading as SBA & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition to remove a non-used registered trademark SBA in Class 22 under Section 47(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, due to admitted non-use by the registered proprietor.
Yashasvi Havelia v. Prabhtej Bhatia and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed a rectification petition removing the trademark 'BANDOOK' registered under Class 33 for non-use over five years, affirming that non-use without denial by the proprietor warrants removal under Section 47(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
ISLAM v. THE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) DELHI
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the accused for kidnapping and sexually assaulting a minor girl, holding that the victim's testimony corroborated by medical evidence sufficed despite minor inconsistencies and procedural omissions.
Mannu v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the accused for sexual assault on a minor based on DNA evidence despite hostile witnesses and procedural lapses, dismissing the appeal.
Parveen Kumar v. Export Inspection Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that appointment of a retired public servant as Inquiring Authority under Rule 11(2) of the EIA Rules is permissible, but failure to grant personal hearing under Rule 11(4) vitiates disciplinary proceedings, warranting remand for fresh inquiry.
Mohd. Mustak v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a Section 302 IPC case due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence and procedural delays, emphasizing that such issues must be tested at trial.
Abdul Ahad v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a mobile phone snatching case due to non-identification by the complainant and prior bail granted to co-accused.
Sajan Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a young accused in an NDPS case, holding that insufficient evidence of conspiracy and non-commercial quantity of ganja justified release on bail.
Modassir Kazmi v. Govt. of NCT Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused involved in dealing stolen mobile phones with altered IMEI numbers due to the necessity of custodial interrogation and ongoing investigation.
Pali Hills Breweries Private Limited v. Carlsberg India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting liquidated damages for delay under a contract clause as a genuine pre-estimate of loss, dismissed most counterclaims, but set aside the rejection of one counterclaim due to contrary evidence.
GOVT.OF NCT OF DELHI v. GAURAV ENTERPRISES
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding payments to a security services contractor, holding that judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is limited and the award was neither illegal nor against public policy.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Sh Rampal SO Hari Ram
The Delhi High Court set aside a Labour Court award for lack of territorial jurisdiction as the labour dispute arose entirely outside Delhi.
Aashish S Saxena v. Dr. Col. S. N. Katiyar
The High Court allowed a petition under Article 227 to reopen the petitioner’s evidence due to illness, granting one more opportunity subject to costs.
S.C. Vohra v. Comptroller and Auditor General of India
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a government servant for unauthorized audits and impersonation, affirming limited judicial review scope and rejecting res judicata bar in disciplinary proceedings.
Commissioner of Income Tax Delhi XVII v. Royal Jordanian Airlines
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Income Tax Department's appeal, directing interest recovery on TDS defaults while recognizing agents' prior tax payments and limiting further tax demands on the principal airline.
IVY ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED v. KAJALBEN (KINJALBEN) NAGINBHAI MAHERIYA & ANR.
The High Court disposed of the appeal by directing the Commercial Court to decide the suit afresh without being influenced by the impugned order, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Siya Ram Kumar v. P.O. & Promod Kumar Tyagi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review application challenging subsistence wages granted under Section 17B of the Industrial Disputes Act, holding that modest family business income does not constitute gainful employment to deny relief.