Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Jakir Ahmad v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to unreliable prosecution evidence, questionable weapon recovery, and inconsistent medical opinion in a robbery and assault case.
Senior Citizen Rajan Kumar Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition for four weeks to enable the petitioner to file a statutory appeal before the Appellate Tribunal MCD, without expressing any opinion on the merits.
Sohn Singh v. Dildar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the defendant's application to recall the plaintiff for cross-examination due to repeated non-appearance and failure to pay court-imposed costs, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural discipline under Section 35B CPC.
Shareef Ahmed & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR registered under Sections 110, 333, and 3(5) BNS on the basis of an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Manoj Kumar & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Kunal Sharma v. The State Govt of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 279 and 337 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Dharmendra v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a private dispute after amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Karti P Chidambaram v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court modified bail conditions to require only prior intimation, not permission, for the petitioner’s foreign travel, balancing liberty with trial integrity.
State v. Pramod Yadav
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused in a criminal assault and robbery case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the limited scope of appellate interference in appeals against acquittal.
Mr. Saquib v. State of NCTC of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application to recall her voluntary withdrawal of a property dispute petition, holding that non-disclosure of material facts and inconsistent stances amounted to abuse of process and that possession under an unregistered agreement is not protected under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act.
Sh. Bharat Bhushan Chugh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner's property until the appeal before the Appellate Tribunal is heard, due to procedural delay caused by absence of the Presiding Officer.
Omender Kumar v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that blacklisting and forfeiture of EMD under tender conditions require adherence to natural justice, including an opportunity to be heard, and set aside the petitioner’s blacklisting and forfeiture imposed without such hearing.
Shanti Mahendran v. Dr. Rajender Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that contempt proceedings cannot be used to challenge the merits of a seniority list redrawn in compliance with Court directions and DoP&T guidelines, dismissing the petition for wilful disobedience.
Jagdish Bhimraj Solanki v. M/S JP Products
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the appeal with liberty to pursue other legal remedies and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
Zeeshan Vasim Hashmi v. Apeirogon Technologies Private Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court corrected a clerical error in its order to accurately record the appearance of counsel for the respondent.
Anil Sharma v. Atul Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed a suit declaring a fraudulent Share Purchase Agreement and Settlement Agreement null and void ab initio under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to file written statements and absence of disputed facts.
Sh Chetan Chauhan v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner for the intestate estate of Late Sh. Madho Singh Chauhan, clarifying that such grant authorizes estate administration without conferring ownership.
Vivek Mathur v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner for administering the estate of the deceased, clarifying that such grant authorizes estate management but does not confer ownership.
Vivek Mathur v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner for the estate of the deceased, emphasizing that such grant authorizes administration but does not confer ownership, subject to compliance with court directions.
V Linga Raju v. UOI and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the forced resignation order of a BSF constable, holding that administrative rejection of withdrawal of resignation was valid and not liable to interference without evidence of coercion.