Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Gurmit Singh v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court restored the discharge of the accused in a forged passport case, holding that absence of the original forged document and lack of prima facie evidence precluded framing of charges.
Sarvesh Security Services Pvt Ltd v. Institute of Human Behaviour Resource and Allied Sciences
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act, the Court cannot extend an arbitrator's mandate after the award is passed unless an extension petition was pending before pronouncement, rendering awards passed post-mandate without extension invalid.
Naik Sheopal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the jurisdiction and validity of a Summary Court Martial against a soldier for false accusation, affirming limited judicial interference in properly conducted military disciplinary proceedings.
Usha v. Staff Selection Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a re-examination of the petitioner by a specialist to determine medical fitness for recruitment as Sub-Inspector, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Suresh Kumar Yadav and Ors v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that employees completing four years in grade pay ₹4800 are entitled to grade pay ₹5400, directing pay re-fixation and arrears payment.
Jagwinder Singh Khurana and Anr. v. Tejinder Kaur Baweja and Anr.
The Delhi High Court denied specific performance for failure to prove readiness and willingness, awarding refund with interest instead.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s. Remfry and Sagar
The Delhi High Court upheld the allowability of license fees paid for use of goodwill under the Income Tax Act, rejecting the Revenue's contention that such payments violated Bar Council Rules and were disallowable under Section 37.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 v. ASHUTOSH DEVELOPERS P. LTD
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals holding that mechanical approvals under Sections 153D and 151 of the Income Tax Act without application of mind are invalid.
Giriraj Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for de-sealing his property used for non-polluting activities, with inspection and assessment of misuse charges as per law.
Jagbir Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under NGT orders for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuse charges based on actual use.
Brahmjeet Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation to consider the petitioner's application for de-sealing a property sealed under an NGT order, with procedural safeguards and assessment of misuse charges only after inspection.
Dheeraj Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order against polluting activities, subject to procedural safeguards and assessment of misuse charges.
Ajit Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed procedural compliance for de-sealing a property sealed under an NGT order, emphasizing permissible use and assessment of misuse charges by the municipal authority.
Giriraj Singh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuse charges based on permissible use under the Master Plan of Delhi 2021.
Umesh Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed de-sealing of a property sealed under an NGT order for polluting activities, subject to an undertaking and assessment of misuser charges by the MCD.
Braham Prakash v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the DDA can act against unauthorized construction under the DD Act without deciding ownership disputes, which must be resolved by civil courts, and directed the DDA to provide owners a hearing before demolition.
Pravin Gupta & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed review petitions where petitioners contradicted their earlier admissions regarding appointment pursuant to a 1987 recruitment advertisement promising pensionary benefits.
Union of India v. Ex Sgt Abhaya Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to an ex-serviceman suffering from PIVD aggravated by military service, affirming the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction and the presumption favoring armed forces personnel in disability claims.
Union of India & Ors. v. 773702-H Sgt Bhanu Pratap Yadav (Retd)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming that the disease is presumed service-connected absent proof to the contrary and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law only.
Dilwar Singh Rana v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioners' pending representations by passing a reasoned and speaking order within four weeks, disposing of the writ petitions accordingly.