Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging framing of notice under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that a former Managing Director must return company property forthwith upon removal, and proof of entrustment is not required.
Aamir v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a rape case, observing prima facie evidence of false implication and unexplained delay, subject to strict conditions to ensure investigation and protection of the complainant.
Sri Sai Sapthagiri Sponge Pvt. Ltd. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & M/s Magnifico Minerals Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed complaints under Section 138 N.I. Act holding that cheques issued solely as security were not enforceable and summoning orders by a court lacking jurisdiction were invalid.
Sonu Rathore v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that vague allegations unsupported by specific evidence and rebutted by medical reports do not justify denial of bail.
Abdul Hameed Rehmani v. CBI
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay and impleadment of the legal heir in a long-pending criminal revision petition, affirming the High Court's discretionary power to continue revisional proceedings after the death of the petitioner.
Abdul Hameed Rehmani v. Special Director Enforcement Directorate
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay and impleadment of the legal heir to continue a pending appeal under FERA and FEMA after the appellant's death, holding that such right is statutorily guaranteed without prescribed limitation.
Jai Mangal Mehto v. State (Govt. N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for attempted sexual assault of a child under the POCSO Act, affirming the statutory presumption in favour of the prosecution and the sufficiency of forensic and ocular evidence despite medical findings of an intact hymen.
Pradeep Singh v. State Government NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Pradeep Singh under MCOCA, holding that his active involvement in organised crime financial dealings and evasion of investigation precluded grant of bail.
Udai Pal v. State
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape charges due to failure of prosecution to conclusively prove the prosecutrix's age below the age of consent, emphasizing the necessity of reliable evidence and scientific age determination.
Ramphal v. State of NCT of Delhi
The High Court acquitted the appellant of molestation charges due to inconsistencies and lack of corroboration in the testimony of a visually impaired prosecutrix, emphasizing the need for corroboration when the testimony is not wholly reliable.
Amir v. State of NCT Delhi and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 354, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and resumption of cohabitation between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Union of India v. GP Capt Dilip Kumar Saluja Retd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus and hypertension, holding the disabilities were not attributable to military service.
Pankaj Tomar v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha
The Delhi High Court held that employees of IGIT continue as employees of IGDTUW under the 2012 Act and are not entitled to transfer back to GGSIPU, dismissing the petitioner’s writ seeking such transfer.
Amar Pal Nanhey v. State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a serious sexual assault case involving a minor, emphasizing the gravity of offences and the need for heightened caution at the bail stage.
Metrro Waste Handling Pvt. Ltd. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a short-term tender for non-conforming mixed waste does not infringe the petitioner's exclusive rights under a long-term waste management Concession Agreement.
Amit Jindal v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed quashing of a dowry harassment FIR following an amicable settlement and corrected typographical errors in its earlier judgment.
Tata Capital Limited v. Pinky
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act after a prima facie finding of a valid arbitration agreement, limiting judicial scrutiny to existence and not arbitrability of disputes.
M/S NARESH KUMAR GUPTA AND CO PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court appointed a neutral arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes where the respondent failed to appoint an arbitrator as per the arbitration clause.
Chand Vij v. Govt of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement, leaving merits and arbitrability to the arbitral tribunal.
Sangam Vihar Vikas Manch v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court closed the review petition after the GNCTD committed to constructing an Ayushman Arogya Mandir within six months, binding it to this undertaking.