Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Rajesh Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9296

Delhi High Court allowed extension of catering stall license at Bhopal Railway Station for seven months, affirming its jurisdiction and consistent judicial approach to Indian Railways' uniform policies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways catering policy license extension

Dr. Amit Prasad v. Union of India

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9243-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging the ICC's composition after respondents agreed not to proceed on its findings, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again if aggrieved.

administrative petition_dismissed Internal Complaints Committee Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 Section 4(2)(a) constitution of ICC

Mudit Gupta v. Airports Authority of India & others

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that blind candidates identified as suitable for posts under the RPWD Act cannot be excluded based on medical certification of inability to "see" and mandated reassessment with reasonable accommodation, upholding the rights-based model of disability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 functional requirements reasonable accommodation blind candidates

Mohd. Nawab v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

16 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9172-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting claims of witness discrepancies and lack of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder intention Section 302 IPC

Competent Automobiles Co Ltd v. M/S Supreme Motors

16 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9211

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to lead evidence after closure on payment of outstanding and further costs, directing expeditious trial management.

civil appeal_allowed costs closure of evidence recall of order expeditious disposal

Sarjit Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:9220-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once land is acquired and vested in the government with compensation paid, it cannot be restored to the original owners even if unutilized, and the government may use it for other public purposes or place it in a Land Bank.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition vesting of land Land Acquisition Act 1894 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013

Union Bank of India v. M/S Shabd Enterprises and Anr

16 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9204

The Delhi High Court restored a loan recovery suit dismissed in default due to the petitioner bank's negligence, imposing costs and directing an internal inquiry to protect public funds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan recovery suit dismissal in default substituted service restoration of suit

National Highways Authority of India v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

16 Oct 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:9222
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional costs and interest to the contractor for delays not attributable to it, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Contract interpretation Extension of time

Usha Drager Private Limited & Anr. v. Draegerwerk Aktiengesellschaft & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9197

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a civil suit, holding that mere allegations in pleadings before another court do not constitute reasonable apprehension of bias to justify transfer under Section 24 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Section 24 CPC transfer of suit reasonable apprehension of bias jurisdiction

Dr. Gurneet Singh Bakshi & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

16 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9196

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Nitin Jain v. State & Anr.

16 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9210
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Hanish Gupta & Anr v. State Through SHO and Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9213

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Gulfam & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

16 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9214

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Khushwant Kaur v. Gagandeep Sidhu

16 Oct 2025 · Sanjeev Narula

The Delhi High Court upheld a woman's statutory right of residence under the DV Act in a matrimonial property dispute, affirming protective orders against dispossession despite the Petitioners' exclusive ownership claims.

family petition_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 shared household right of residence domestic relationship

Rajesh Damor v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9257-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking direction to decide a revision petition after the revision was decided, granting liberty to challenge the order in accordance with law.

administrative petition_allowed writ petition revision petition direction to decide withdrawal of petition

Union of India & Ors. v. MWO HFO Shanker Gurung

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service-related disability absent contrary proof and limiting certiorari interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal certiorari jurisdiction

Munendra Kumar Das v. Union of India & Anr.

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9245-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to raise broader issues through a Public Interest Litigation.

constitutional other writ petition withdrawal leave and liberty Public Interest Litigation

Nidhi Parihar v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9244-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging invalidation from military service on medical grounds, holding that medical records conclusively established a pre-existing seizure disorder and that review cannot be used to reargue settled issues.

administrative petition_dismissed invalided out of service seizure disorder medical record pre-existing condition

Yogesh Pal v. State of NCT of Delhi

15 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9392

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition alleging illegal detention and custodial abuse of visually impaired students, holding that alternate statutory remedies exist and extraordinary writ jurisdiction should not be exercised.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant illegal detention custodial harassment writ petition Article 226

Dr. Meenakkshi Sharma v. Monika Chugh

15 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9523-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's appeal against eviction, holding that the pending counterclaim for security deposit recovery is a separate suit to be adjudicated independently.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant counterclaim commercial tenancy Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction