Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Sitaram Barwal and Ors v. Union of India and Ors

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9248-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that petitioners are entitled to grade pay of ₹5400 after four years in ₹4800 grade pay and directed re-fixation of pay and arrears accordingly.

service_law petition_allowed Significant grade pay pay fixation arrears service period

BIMA SUGAM INDIA FEDERATION v. A RANGE GOWDA & ORS.

16 Oct 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:9315

The Delhi High Court held that the Plaintiff, backed by IRDAI's public announcements, is the prior user of the 'BIMA SUGAM' mark and granted interim mandatory injunction directing transfer of disputed domain names from Defendant No. 1, who acted in bad faith and engaged in cybersquatting.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement prior user rights bad faith cybersquatting

Ram Jeevan Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

16 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9300

The Delhi High Court held that regularization applications must be considered by MCD without adjudicating pending title disputes, which are to be resolved in civil court, and declined to interfere with the property pending the suit.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant unauthorized construction regularization title dispute Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Sh. Kuldeep Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

16 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9298

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition and vacation of property pending appeal before the Appellate Tribunal, emphasizing the need for natural justice and fair hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Demolition Order Vacation Notice Municipal Corporation of Delhi Principles of Natural Justice

Union of India & Ors. v. 622830 MWO Achyutanand Rai (Retd.)

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9247-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is attributable to military service absent contrary proof.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Union of India v. M/s UEE Electricals Engineers Pvt Ltd

16 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9219-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act, set aside the dismissal of the Section 34 petition for summary rejection without merit consideration, condoned delay, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on the challenged claims.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Section 37 appeal condonation of delay

Sanjay @ Sanjeev @ Baba v. State

16 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9283
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant due to substantial doubts in the prosecution's police-only evidence and procedural lapses in a case of alleged illegal weapon possession and firing at police.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant secret information police witnesses independent witnesses possession of illegal weapon

Shri Mangal Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:9206

The Delhi High Court held that forfeiture proceedings under SAFEM FOP Act require a valid nexus between illegal activities and properties, and quashed forfeiture orders lacking such nexus.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant SAFEM FOP Act Section 6(1) notice forfeiture of property nexus requirement

Prakash Singh v. Union of India and Anr.

16 Oct 2025 · Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:9208
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a retired IPS officer's petition seeking reimbursement for emergency medical treatment abroad, holding that existing rules and policies exclude pensioners from such benefits under CS (MA) Rules and CGHS.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Services (Medical Attendance) Rules, 1944 Central Government Health Scheme medical treatment abroad retired government servant

Lokesh Singh v. Union of India

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9271-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Rule 42(a) of the BSF Rules does not bar disciplinary proceedings against a BSF personnel for facilitation or omission absent conspiracy with persons outside the force, and dismissed the petition challenging the dismissal order.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Border Security Force Disciplinary proceedings Rule 42(a) BSF Rules 1969 Facilitation

Madhawendra Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9253-DB

The High Court dismissed the writ petition with liberty to file afresh after the petitioner exhausts the remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Armed Forces Tribunal writ petition withdrawal of petition statutory remedy

Suneel Rawat v. Union of India and Ors

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9255-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the medical board’s decision disqualifying a candidate with a benign solitary pulmonary nodule from recruitment as Sub-Inspector, refusing to interfere absent arbitrariness.

administrative petition_dismissed medical disqualification recruitment standards armed forces recruitment benign solitary pulmonary nodule

Rajesh Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9296

Delhi High Court allowed extension of catering stall license at Bhopal Railway Station for seven months, affirming its jurisdiction and consistent judicial approach to Indian Railways' uniform policies.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant territorial jurisdiction Article 226 Indian Railways catering policy license extension

Dr. Amit Prasad v. Union of India

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9243-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging the ICC's composition after respondents agreed not to proceed on its findings, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the Court again if aggrieved.

administrative petition_dismissed Internal Complaints Committee Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 Section 4(2)(a) constitution of ICC

Mudit Gupta v. Airports Authority of India & others

16 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that blind candidates identified as suitable for posts under the RPWD Act cannot be excluded based on medical certification of inability to "see" and mandated reassessment with reasonable accommodation, upholding the rights-based model of disability.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 functional requirements reasonable accommodation blind candidates

Mohd. Nawab v. State N.C.T. of Delhi

16 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9172-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence proving guilt beyond reasonable doubt, rejecting claims of witness discrepancies and lack of motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder intention Section 302 IPC

Competent Automobiles Co Ltd v. M/S Supreme Motors

16 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9211

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to lead evidence after closure on payment of outstanding and further costs, directing expeditious trial management.

civil appeal_allowed costs closure of evidence recall of order expeditious disposal

Sarjit Singh and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

16 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:9220-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once land is acquired and vested in the government with compensation paid, it cannot be restored to the original owners even if unutilized, and the government may use it for other public purposes or place it in a Land Bank.

property petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition vesting of land Land Acquisition Act 1894 Right to Fair Compensation Act 2013

Union Bank of India v. M/S Shabd Enterprises and Anr

16 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9204

The Delhi High Court restored a loan recovery suit dismissed in default due to the petitioner bank's negligence, imposing costs and directing an internal inquiry to protect public funds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan recovery suit dismissal in default substituted service restoration of suit

National Highways Authority of India v. Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd.

16 Oct 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:9222
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional costs and interest to the contractor for delays not attributable to it, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Contract interpretation Extension of time