Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Meera Sawhney & Anr. v. State & Anr.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9383-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the deceased, affirming the limited jurisdiction of Probate Courts and rejecting challenges based on family settlement validity and alleged suspicious circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Probate Court jurisdiction Indian Succession Act Will execution Testamentary capacity

Tapas Kumar Mallick & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9583

The Delhi High Court held that the upper age limits under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, do not apply retrospectively to couples who commenced surrogacy procedures before the Act's enforcement, upholding their fundamental right to reproductive autonomy.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 age limit retrospective application reproductive autonomy

Dammalapati Yashoda Satya v. Union of India

27 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9390-DB

The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner received the joining letter, negating the need for further relief.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition joining letter infructuous petition appointment

GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence HQ & Ors.

27 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9397-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, is competent under Section 83 of the CGST Act to provisionally attach bank accounts, dismissing the petition challenging the attachment.

administrative petition_dismissed provisional attachment Section 83 CGST Act Principal Additional Director General Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Stanley Chimeizi Alasonye v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in commercial quantity drug offences under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural lapses without prejudice do not entitle bail and illegal stay with forged documents constitute flight risk.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail commercial quantity

Sunder Lal v. Union of India

27 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9388-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner's request after partial hearing.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

JAI MAA VAISHNO STEEL v. GULSHAN GUGNANI

27 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9366

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the respondent to admit audio recordings as evidence during trial, dismissing the petitioner's challenge and review application.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XI Rule 1 CPC Order XVI Rule 1 CPC admission of evidence audio recordings

Gurbachan Singh Matta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Criminal prosecution against a bank official was quashed where he was exonerated on merits in departmental and CVC inquiries on identical allegations, holding continuation of trial an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR exoneration in departmental inquiry abuse of process mens rea

Renu Tora v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9349

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charge under Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act against a petitioner accused of withholding a child victim’s earnings, holding that a prima facie case existed based on the victim’s statement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 79 JJ Act framing of charge prima facie case withholding earnings

M/S Andhra Pradesh Gas Power Corporatio Ltd. v. The CBI

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing separate trials for distinct conspiracies involving multiple companies, holding that the transactions did not constitute a single transaction warranting a joint trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant joint trial separate trial criminal conspiracy same transaction

State of NCT of Delhi v. Afsar @ Dinesh & Ors.

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9363

The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused for causing simple injuries, holding that minor contradictions and delay do not vitiate a proved prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt simple injury common intention MLC

Nahid Abbasi v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9356

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Nahid Abbasi in a murder and forgery case after considering the completion of investigation, lack of direct evidence, and imposing strict conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder forgery conspiracy

Punita Khatter v. Explorers Travel & Tour Pvt Ltd

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9359

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging framing of notice under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013, holding that a former Managing Director must return company property forthwith upon removal, and proof of entrustment is not required.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 452 Companies Act 2013 wrongful withholding Managing Director removal Section 482 CrPC

Aamir v. State NCT of Delhi

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9360

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a rape case, observing prima facie evidence of false implication and unexplained delay, subject to strict conditions to ensure investigation and protection of the complainant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail rape false implication unexplained delay

Sri Sai Sapthagiri Sponge Pvt. Ltd. v. The State (GNCT of Delhi) & M/s Magnifico Minerals Pvt. Ltd.

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court quashed complaints under Section 138 N.I. Act holding that cheques issued solely as security were not enforceable and summoning orders by a court lacking jurisdiction were invalid.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act security cheque quashing of complaint Section 482 CrPC

Sonu Rathore v. State of NCT of Delhi & Arjun Singh Rathore

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9365

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a dowry death case, holding that vague allegations unsupported by specific evidence and rebutted by medical reports do not justify denial of bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail dowry death Section 118 Indian Evidence Act Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita

Abdul Hameed Rehmani v. CBI

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9357
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay and impleadment of the legal heir in a long-pending criminal revision petition, affirming the High Court's discretionary power to continue revisional proceedings after the death of the petitioner.

criminal petition_allowed Significant substitution of legal representatives condonation of delay criminal revision petition High Court revisional jurisdiction

Abdul Hameed Rehmani v. Special Director Enforcement Directorate

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9358
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay and impleadment of the legal heir to continue a pending appeal under FERA and FEMA after the appellant's death, holding that such right is statutorily guaranteed without prescribed limitation.

criminal petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay legal heir impleadment FERA 1973 FEMA 1999

Jai Mangal Mehto v. State (Govt. N.C.T. of Delhi)

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9353
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for attempted sexual assault of a child under the POCSO Act, affirming the statutory presumption in favour of the prosecution and the sufficiency of forensic and ocular evidence despite medical findings of an intact hymen.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act Section 29 POCSO attempted sexual assault intact hymen

Pradeep Singh v. State Government NCT of Delhi

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9350

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Pradeep Singh under MCOCA, holding that his active involvement in organised crime financial dealings and evasion of investigation precluded grant of bail.

criminal appeal_dismissed MCOCA bail organised crime syndicate concealment of property