Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Neeraj Agarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

28 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:9514

The Delhi High Court upheld bail conditions restricting the petitioner from running his medical centre but modified travel restrictions, balancing the right to livelihood with the need for a fair investigation and trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail conditions Article 19(1)(g) right to livelihood Section 439 CrPC

Rinku Kumar v. The State of NCT of Delhi

28 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9505-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Habeas Corpus petition seeking production of a major wife, holding that her voluntary choice to stay with her mother negated any claim of illegal detention.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus illegal detention majority voluntary statement

Varian Medical Systems International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India

28 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain

The Delhi High Court held that while the audit report was validly issued within limitation under Section 65 of the CGST Act, the premature issuance of the Show Cause Notice before expiry of the pre-SCN response period violated natural justice and was quashed.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CGST Act Section 65 audit limitation period pre-Show Cause Notice Show Cause Notice

GAMELOFT SOFTWARE PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX, RANGE 152 & ANR.

28 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9495-DB

The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of delayed IGST refund applications and held that interest is payable for delays caused by late issuance of deficiency memos under the CGST Act and Rules.

tax petition_allowed Significant CGST Act refund application interest on delayed refund deficiency memo

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd v. DWD Pharmaceuticals Ltd

28 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9491-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of cross appeals as infructuous following an amicable settlement and set aside the costs imposed earlier in accordance with the settlement terms.

civil appeal_dismissed settlement agreement Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC costs appeal infructuous

Sh Inderjeet Singh Bindra v. Smt Ramesh Kumari & Ors.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9376-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an amendment seeking cancellation of a General Power of Attorney barred by the three-year limitation under Article 59 of the Limitation Act cannot be allowed, and dismissed the appeal against the rejection of such amendment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant General Power of Attorney Limitation Act 1963 Article 59 Article 65

Manuja Sharma v. Rahul Sharma & Anr.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9379-DB

The Delhi High Court held that deletion of relief at the preliminary stage based solely on a forensic report and without evidence is impermissible, setting aside the order that dismissed part of the partition suit on grounds of alleged forgery and unclean hands.

civil appeal_allowed Significant unclean hands relinquishment deed forgery CFSL report

Yogesh Jain v. D.S.S. Hotels Pvt Ltd & Ors.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9378-DB

The High Court held that the appellant lacked prima facie title to be a necessary party in the partition suit and set aside the order cancelling the relinquishment deed, affirming dismissal of impleadment application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit necessary party impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC

Meera Sawhney & Anr. v. State & Anr.

28 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9383-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the probate of a Will executed by the deceased, affirming the limited jurisdiction of Probate Courts and rejecting challenges based on family settlement validity and alleged suspicious circumstances.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Probate Court jurisdiction Indian Succession Act Will execution Testamentary capacity

Tapas Kumar Mallick & Anr. v. Union of India & Anr.

27 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9583

The Delhi High Court held that the upper age limits under the Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021, do not apply retrospectively to couples who commenced surrogacy procedures before the Act's enforcement, upholding their fundamental right to reproductive autonomy.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant Surrogacy (Regulation) Act, 2021 age limit retrospective application reproductive autonomy

Dammalapati Yashoda Satya v. Union of India

27 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9390-DB

The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the petitioner received the joining letter, negating the need for further relief.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition joining letter infructuous petition appointment

GMG Tradelink Pvt. Ltd. v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence HQ & Ors.

27 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9397-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Principal Additional Director General, DGGI, is competent under Section 83 of the CGST Act to provisionally attach bank accounts, dismissing the petition challenging the attachment.

administrative petition_dismissed provisional attachment Section 83 CGST Act Principal Additional Director General Directorate General of GST Intelligence

Stanley Chimeizi Alasonye v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in commercial quantity drug offences under the NDPS Act, holding that procedural lapses without prejudice do not entitle bail and illegal stay with forged documents constitute flight risk.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Act bail commercial quantity

Sunder Lal v. Union of India

27 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9388-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioner's request after partial hearing.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

JAI MAA VAISHNO STEEL v. GULSHAN GUGNANI

27 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9366

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing the respondent to admit audio recordings as evidence during trial, dismissing the petitioner's challenge and review application.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XI Rule 1 CPC Order XVI Rule 1 CPC admission of evidence audio recordings

Gurbachan Singh Matta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Criminal prosecution against a bank official was quashed where he was exonerated on merits in departmental and CVC inquiries on identical allegations, holding continuation of trial an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR exoneration in departmental inquiry abuse of process mens rea

Renu Tora v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

27 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9349

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charge under Section 79 of the Juvenile Justice Act against a petitioner accused of withholding a child victim’s earnings, holding that a prima facie case existed based on the victim’s statement.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 79 JJ Act framing of charge prima facie case withholding earnings

M/S Andhra Pradesh Gas Power Corporatio Ltd. v. The CBI

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna

The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing separate trials for distinct conspiracies involving multiple companies, holding that the transactions did not constitute a single transaction warranting a joint trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant joint trial separate trial criminal conspiracy same transaction

State of NCT of Delhi v. Afsar @ Dinesh & Ors.

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9363

The Delhi High Court set aside the acquittal and convicted the accused for causing simple injuries, holding that minor contradictions and delay do not vitiate a proved prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt simple injury common intention MLC

Nahid Abbasi v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

27 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9356

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to Nahid Abbasi in a murder and forgery case after considering the completion of investigation, lack of direct evidence, and imposing strict conditions to safeguard the trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder forgery conspiracy