Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisha Sharma & Ors

31 Oct 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9598

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased victim in a motor accident caused by rash and negligent driving.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rash and negligent driving eyewitness testimony

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

31 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9592
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld FSSAI's regulatory ban on using 'ORS' in food product names to prevent consumer confusion and protect public health, dismissing the petition challenging the orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 FSSAI ORS consumer deception

S.K. Singhal v. Union of India & Ors

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9565-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review petition and refused to allow new documents post-conclusion, affirming the limited scope of review and the lawfulness of disciplinary proceedings under CCS (CCA) Rules.

administrative review_dismissed review petition disciplinary proceedings CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 introduction of new documents

Taruna v. State Through SHO PS Jahangir Puri & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9590-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus relief over alleged fraudulent adoption, holding that disputed factual issues and delay render the writ petition not maintainable.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 Adoption deed Fraud

Staff Selection Commission and Others v. Dinesh Chandra

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9569-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Staff Selection Commission to empanel the respondent, ruling that administrative lapses in obtaining verification reports cannot prejudice a candidate's empanelment rights.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant empanelment verification report Staff Selection Commission administrative lapse

Union of India v. Laxman Singh

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9552-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting Group A classification and attendant benefits to certain officers from the date of the 2009 office memorandum, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Group A classification CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 office memorandum 09.04.2009 Central Administrative Tribunal

Mohd Shafi v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9575-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.

administrative other writ petition representation reasoned order speaking order

V Balasubramanian v. Union of India

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9564-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that delay in deciding a transfer representation without mala fide does not amount to contempt.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal transfer representation delay in compliance contempt petition

Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Dilip Kumar Nanda (Retd.)

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Vishal Gupta v. Radha Aggarwal & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:9807

The Delhi High Court directed official demarcation of disputed family property before adjudicating injunction claims, disposing of interlocutory applications alleging violation of status quo orders.

civil other Significant interim injunction property demarcation family property dispute Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Atul Lakra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

30 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9661

The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment passed by a non-designated Sessions Court for lack of jurisdiction under the Juvenile Justice Act and remanded the matter to the competent Children's Court for fresh adjudication.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act Children's Court Jurisdiction Section 101(1)

M/S ACME INDIA v. DEPT OF TRADE AND TAXES (DELHI GST)

30 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9607-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders passed after opportunity of personal hearing was not availed, directing the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, while deferring the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 168A Show Cause Notice

Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax Delhi North

30 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9606-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appellate remedies under the CGST Act must be exhausted before seeking writ relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Article 226 Writ jurisdiction

Jagdish Chand Gupta v. Union of India

30 Oct 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:9499
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that arbitrators who were employees of a party were ineligible under the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration Act, rendering the award void ab initio.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Ineligibility of arbitrators Arbitral Award setting aside

Manju Arora v. Neelam Arora

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9456-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a daughter-in-law from her in-laws' self-acquired property, balancing her statutory right of residence under the PWDV Act with the senior citizens' right to peaceful living by mandating suitable alternate accommodation.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 right of residence shared household alternate accommodation

Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi v. Neelmani Singh & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9457-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging fraud in property mutation is not barred by limitation if the fraud was discovered later, and the plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold without evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation cause of action plaint rejection property dispute

Maharaji Educational Trust & Anr. v. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9455-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of a Recovery Certificate and directed the Recovery Officer to proceed expeditiously with recovery, rejecting the Petitioners' claim for further recasted statements beyond the certificate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Recovery Certificate Debts Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal Recasted Statement of Account

Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. Union of India

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9487-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF officer for acts prejudicial to discipline, limiting judicial review under Article 226 to procedural compliance and natural justice without re-appreciating evidence.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Border Security Force Act, 1968 General Security Force Court acts prejudicial to discipline

Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union and Anr

30 Oct 2025 · Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:9494

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic order dismissing maintainability objections under Section 33C(2) of the ID Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on whether wage parity claims under CLRA administrative orders can be enforced against the principal employer.

labor remanded Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act employer-employee relationship wage parity

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Aliza Alam; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Radha Krishan

30 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9555-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on all delayed retiral benefits, dismissing the petitioners' challenge due to delay and non-compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal retiral benefits interest on delayed payment execution proceedings