Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Toshniwal Electricals Pvt Ltd v. The Principal Commissioner of Central Tax Delhi North

30 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9606-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand for fraudulent ITC, holding that statutory appellate remedies under the CGST Act must be exhausted before seeking writ relief.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act 2017 Article 226 Writ jurisdiction

Jagdish Chand Gupta v. Union of India

30 Oct 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:9499
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award on the ground that arbitrators who were employees of a party were ineligible under the 2015 Amendment to the Arbitration Act, rendering the award void ab initio.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Ineligibility of arbitrators Arbitral Award setting aside

Manju Arora v. Neelam Arora

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9456-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a daughter-in-law from her in-laws' self-acquired property, balancing her statutory right of residence under the PWDV Act with the senior citizens' right to peaceful living by mandating suitable alternate accommodation.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 right of residence shared household alternate accommodation

Tikka Brijinder Singh Bedi v. Neelmani Singh & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9457-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging fraud in property mutation is not barred by limitation if the fraud was discovered later, and the plaint cannot be rejected at the threshold without evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation cause of action plaint rejection property dispute

Maharaji Educational Trust & Anr. v. Housing and Urban Development Corporation Limited

30 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9455-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of a Recovery Certificate and directed the Recovery Officer to proceed expeditiously with recovery, rejecting the Petitioners' claim for further recasted statements beyond the certificate.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Recovery Certificate Debts Recovery Tribunal Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal Recasted Statement of Account

Patil Shivaji Madhukar v. Union of India

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9487-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF officer for acts prejudicial to discipline, limiting judicial review under Article 226 to procedural compliance and natural justice without re-appreciating evidence.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 226 Border Security Force Act, 1968 General Security Force Court acts prejudicial to discipline

Air India Limited v. Airport Employees Union and Anr

30 Oct 2025 · Renu Bhatnagar · 2025:DHC:9494

The Delhi High Court set aside a cryptic order dismissing maintainability objections under Section 33C(2) of the ID Act and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on whether wage parity claims under CLRA administrative orders can be enforced against the principal employer.

labor remanded Significant Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act Contract Labour Regulation and Abolition Act employer-employee relationship wage parity

Nitesh Kumar Singh; Aliza Alam; Mohnish Sehrawat v. Radha Krishan

30 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9555-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of interest on all delayed retiral benefits, dismissing the petitioners' challenge due to delay and non-compliance.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal retiral benefits interest on delayed payment execution proceedings

Anil Sharma v. Ajay Jain

30 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9512

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the defendant's delayed Written Statement filed without condonation application, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Written Statement Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Commercial Courts Act

Harish Katyal v. Pawan Kumar Dhawan & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9493

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to release excess amount in execution proceedings as the relief was pending before the executing court and no specific order was challenged.

civil petition_dismissed executing court excess amount execution proceedings petition dismissal

Mushir Ahmed v. State

30 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9510

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal, acquitting the appellant of robbery and arms offences due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence but upheld his conviction for absconding under Section 174A IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant benefit of doubt material inconsistencies medical examination timing absconding

Naghma Zahoor v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

30 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:7680-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order denying appointment to the petitioner for a single OBC reserved Medical Officer post rightly awarded to a higher merit candidate.

administrative petition_dismissed Medical Officer recruitment OBC category reservation Central Administrative Tribunal merit list

Ishan Jolly & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr

30 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9511

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 323, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Shahnawaz Alam & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

30 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9497

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce under Muslim law, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Dharmendra Kumar v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

30 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9501

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354A/354B/506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in the interest of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Vikas Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9543-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the competent authority to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to further legal recourse.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition representation competent authority reasoned and speaking order

Daya Ram v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

30 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9582

The Delhi High Court directed the ASI to decide the petitioner's renovation approval application and allowed the petitioner to seek regularization from the MCD, staying demolition during the pendency.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Archaeological Survey of India No Objection Certificate Unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Ziyauddin v. State (NCT of Delhi)

30 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9528

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of property document forgery, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his limited role and cooperation with investigations.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. forged documents property dispute

Ravi Goyal v. Central Bureau of Investigation

30 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court acquitted the contractor and junior engineer accused of cheating and corruption in a borewell contract, holding that prosecution failed to prove non-use of specified pipes or forgery beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Criminal conspiracy Cheating Prevention of Corruption Act Measurement Book

Munchan Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9524-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and file submissions.

other petition_dismissed dismissal for default non-prosecution petition dismissed non-appearance