Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Anil Sharma v. Ajay Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the defendant's delayed Written Statement filed without condonation application, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines under the Commercial Courts Act.
Harish Katyal v. Pawan Kumar Dhawan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to release excess amount in execution proceedings as the relief was pending before the executing court and no specific order was challenged.
Mushir Ahmed v. State
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal, acquitting the appellant of robbery and arms offences due to inconsistencies in prosecution evidence but upheld his conviction for absconding under Section 174A IPC.
Naghma Zahoor v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order denying appointment to the petitioner for a single OBC reserved Medical Officer post rightly awarded to a higher merit candidate.
Ishan Jolly & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354(A), 323, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.
Shahnawaz Alam & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce under Muslim law, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Dharmendra Kumar v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354/354A/354B/506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in the interest of justice.
Vikas Yadav v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the competent authority to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, preserving the petitioner’s right to further legal recourse.
Daya Ram v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the ASI to decide the petitioner's renovation approval application and allowed the petitioner to seek regularization from the MCD, staying demolition during the pendency.
Ziyauddin v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of property document forgery, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given his limited role and cooperation with investigations.
Ravi Goyal v. Central Bureau of Investigation
The Delhi High Court acquitted the contractor and junior engineer accused of cheating and corruption in a borewell contract, holding that prosecution failed to prove non-use of specified pipes or forgery beyond reasonable doubt.
Munchan Kumari v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition for default and non-prosecution due to the petitioner's failure to appear and file submissions.
Union of India v. M/S GR-GAWAR (J.V.)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a Section 34 petition filed without the arbitral award and beyond the 120-day limitation period is non est and barred by limitation, with delay not condonable.
Patil Rail Infrastructure Pvt Ltd v. Pandrol Limited
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal without deciding merits after the appellants undertook not to use certain disputed diagrams during the pendency of the suit.
Jagan Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed as premature a writ petition challenging the institution of a preliminary inquiry against a government official, holding that such inquiries cannot be interdicted before conclusion.
DAY1 ADVISORS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS v. CATALYST TRUSTEESHIP LIMITED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court refused interim relief under Section 9 and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes over alleged default and sale of pledged shares under arbitration agreements.
State v. Parvesh Rana & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a sentence less than the statutory minimum for rape under Section 376 IPC, holding that adequate and special reasons recorded by the trial court justify such sentencing and appellate interference is unwarranted absent arbitrariness.
Anil Kumar Jain v. National Council of Education Research and Training
The Delhi High Court upheld the withholding of gratuity for unauthorized occupation of government quarters post-retirement but directed payment of interest on delayed release of balance dues.
Jamia Hamdard Deemed to be University v. Delhi Jal Board
The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Jal Board to provide water supply to Jamia Hamdard University by March 2026, emphasizing the authority's obligation to fulfill prior commitments within a reasonable timeframe.
Rakesh Aggarwal v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation
The Delhi High Court granted liberty to file an appeal against the rejection of a municipal regularization application and stayed coercive action for four weeks without expressing any opinion on the merits.