Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Sunita Shah v. Commissioner of Customs, IGI Airport & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9619-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a customs confiscation order for non-issuance of a valid Show Cause Notice and directed unconditional release of seized gold bangles, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance and natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Customs Act, 1962 confiscation natural justice

M/S R GUPTA METAL STORE v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI NORTH

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9628-DB

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging orders involving fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit under the CGST Act are not maintainable and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act Article 226 writ jurisdiction

M/S SWARN COSMETIC (INDIA) v. UNION OF INDIA

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9611-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner a hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice natural justice

Shree Balajee Traders v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 71 & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9612-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice Section 168A GST Act natural justice opportunity to be heard

M/S HARI CATERING SERVICES v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9624

Delhi High Court granted a 7-month extension to a catering stall licensee at Mahesana Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and relying on prior similar orders under the uniform Indian Railways Catering Policy, 2017.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Catering Policy 2017 Indian Railways territorial jurisdiction Article 226

Seema Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9623

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file a regularization application for unauthorized construction and restrained demolition pending its consideration with a personal hearing under Section 248 of the Cantonment Act, 2006.

administrative petition_dismissed Cantonment Act 2006 Section 248 regularization unauthorized construction

Jyoti Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9622

The Delhi High Court granted petitioners liberty to seek temporary desealing of properties sealed for unauthorized construction, subject to compliance with MCD directions and regularization procedures.

administrative other sealing of property unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi temporary desealing

Rashtriya Rajdhani Kshetra Tipahiya Chalak Union Delhi Regd v. The Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9621

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow auto-taxi operators to continue parking at Anand Vihar Railway Station on payment of prescribed charges and submission of declarations, restraining arbitrary displacement or additional charges without a reasoned order.

administrative petition_allowed auto-taxi stand Anand Vihar Railway Station parking charges reasoned order

Shriram General Insurance Co Ltd v. Nisha Sharma & Ors

31 Oct 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9598

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the Tribunal's award of compensation to the legal heirs of a deceased victim in a motor accident caused by rash and negligent driving.

motor_accident_claims appeal_dismissed Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Motor Accident Claims Tribunal rash and negligent driving eyewitness testimony

DR REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED & ORS v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR

31 Oct 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9592
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld FSSAI's regulatory ban on using 'ORS' in food product names to prevent consumer confusion and protect public health, dismissing the petition challenging the orders.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 FSSAI ORS consumer deception

S.K. Singhal v. Union of India & Ors

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9565-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's review petition and refused to allow new documents post-conclusion, affirming the limited scope of review and the lawfulness of disciplinary proceedings under CCS (CCA) Rules.

administrative review_dismissed review petition disciplinary proceedings CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 introduction of new documents

Taruna v. State Through SHO PS Jahangir Puri & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:9590-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking Habeas Corpus relief over alleged fraudulent adoption, holding that disputed factual issues and delay render the writ petition not maintainable.

constitutional petition_dismissed Habeas Corpus Article 226 Adoption deed Fraud

Staff Selection Commission and Others v. Dinesh Chandra

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9569-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing the Staff Selection Commission to empanel the respondent, ruling that administrative lapses in obtaining verification reports cannot prejudice a candidate's empanelment rights.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant empanelment verification report Staff Selection Commission administrative lapse

Union of India v. Laxman Singh

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9552-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order granting Group A classification and attendant benefits to certain officers from the date of the 2009 office memorandum, dismissing the Union of India's challenge.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Group A classification CCS (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 office memorandum 09.04.2009 Central Administrative Tribunal

Mohd Shafi v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9575-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the writ petition as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four weeks, allowing the petitioner to seek further remedies if aggrieved.

administrative other writ petition representation reasoned order speaking order

V Balasubramanian v. Union of India

31 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9564-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's dismissal of a contempt petition, holding that delay in deciding a transfer representation without mala fide does not amount to contempt.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal transfer representation delay in compliance contempt petition

Union of India & Ors. v. Sub Dilip Kumar Nanda (Retd.)

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law only.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Vishal Gupta v. Radha Aggarwal & Ors.

30 Oct 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:9807

The Delhi High Court directed official demarcation of disputed family property before adjudicating injunction claims, disposing of interlocutory applications alleging violation of status quo orders.

civil other Significant interim injunction property demarcation family property dispute Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC

Atul Lakra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

30 Oct 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:9661

The Delhi High Court set aside a judgment passed by a non-designated Sessions Court for lack of jurisdiction under the Juvenile Justice Act and remanded the matter to the competent Children's Court for fresh adjudication.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act Children's Court Jurisdiction Section 101(1)

M/S ACME INDIA v. DEPT OF TRADE AND TAXES (DELHI GST)

30 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9607-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST adjudication orders passed after opportunity of personal hearing was not availed, directing the petitioner to file appeal with pre-deposit, while deferring the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 168A Show Cause Notice