Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 3rd February, 2026
SATENDER SINGH.....Petitioner
Through: Appearance not given.
Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with SI Ritika Dhiwan.
JUDGMENT
1. Petitioner seeks parole for a period of 30 days for the reason that his representation given to the Competent Authority has not been given any timely consideration.
2. Learned Standing Counsel (Crl.) for the State, however, submits that as per the information gathered from the Jail Authorities, the convict i.e. petitioner herein, has already been granted second spell of furlough for a period of two weeks by the Competent Authority vide order dated 06.01.2026 but till date such furlough has not even been availed by the petitioner.
3. She has placed on record copy of the communication dated 02.02.2026 received from the Central Jail No.1 which is accompanied by copy of order of grant of furlough.
4. The entire set has been supplied to learned counsel for petitioner.
5. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of the above, at this moment, he does not pray for any further relief and would rather advise his W.P.(CRL) 270/2026 2 client to furnish the requisite bonds in terms of the furlough granted to him.
6. The petition stands disposed of in aforesaid terms.
JUDGE FEBRUARY 3, 2026/ss/pb