Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Siddappa v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9669-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition after the respondents agreed to grant Children Education Allowance for the petitioner’s second and third child without adjudicating the merits.

administrative other Children Education Allowance writ petition voluntary concession disposal of petition

Kiran Infra Engineers Ltd. v. Northern Railways

31 Oct 2025 · Dinesh Mehta; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9648-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging rejection of a Section 34 application for setting aside an arbitral award due to delay, holding that sufficient cause for delay must be pleaded and proved, and oral assertions without pleadings are insufficient.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 application Limitation Act, 1963 condonation of delay

Siddharth @ Siddharth Vasisht @ Siddharth Vats & Ors. v. Manju Rani

31 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9694

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction orders against tenants, affirming the landlord's bona fide requirement and ownership, and rejecting tenants' belated claims and documents in revision petitions under the Delhi Rent Control Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship

M/S CRITIQUE COMMUNICATION PVT LTD v. SALES TAX OFFICER CLASS II AVATO WARD 2 ZONE 2 & ORS

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9616-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST demand orders for failure to afford opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of impugned notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A GST Act show cause notice natural justice ex-parte order

Shameem v. Commissioner of Customs

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9617-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Confiscation without valid Show Cause Notice and hearing is illegal; seized goods must be released upon payment of duty if appeal remains undecided beyond statutory period.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Show Cause Notice Confiscation Natural Justice

Amit Urf Bhima v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9550

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to hold a religious Jagran at a public location with conditions, emphasizing that requisite approvals and prior permissions justify granting such permission despite public safety concerns.

administrative petition_allowed religious event permission Maa Bhagwati Jagran Municipal Corporation of Delhi public safety

M/S. KALYR RETAIL PVT. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF GOODS AND SERVICES TAX, DELHI

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9615-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex parte GST demand orders for failure to afford hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication subject to the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act.

tax remanded Significant Goods and Services Tax Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Section 168A GST Act

High Spirit Commercial Ventures Private Limited v. Additional Commissioner CGST Delhi West Commissionerate

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9614-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging demands for fraudulent ITC, holding that such disputes must be resolved through statutory appeals under the CGST Act and not writ jurisdiction.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act fraudulent ITC writ jurisdiction

Rajesh Kumar & Ors. v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9538

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 323/308/34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences

Nargis Kalra v. The Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:9655

The Delhi High Court granted Letters of Administration to the petitioner, a Class I legal heir, for the Testator's Will, dispensing with the administrative-cum-surety bond requirement in an uncontested succession matter.

property petition_allowed Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act, 1925 Class I legal heirs administrative-cum-surety bond

M/S PINEAPPLE INFRA PROJECTS LTD v. SANTOSH KAUR & ORS

31 Oct 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9633

The High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC based on defendants' pleadings or documents and upheld the Trial Court's order dismissing the petitioner's application for rejection of plaint in a partition suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC rejection of plaint cause of action res judicata

M/S Swarn Cosmetics (India) v. Union of India

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9618-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of digitally authenticated GST Show Cause Notices and orders, held pre-consultation notices under amended Rule 142(1A) discretionary, and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Show Cause Notice digital signature pre-consultation notice Rule 142(1A)

Sunita Shah v. Commissioner of Customs, IGI Airport & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9619-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside a customs confiscation order for non-issuance of a valid Show Cause Notice and directed unconditional release of seized gold bangles, emphasizing mandatory procedural compliance and natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Customs Act, 1962 confiscation natural justice

M/S R GUPTA METAL STORE v. CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX DELHI NORTH

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9628-DB

The Delhi High Court held that writ petitions challenging orders involving fraudulent availment of Input Tax Credit under the CGST Act are not maintainable and directed the petitioner to pursue statutory appellate remedies.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Input Tax Credit CGST Act Article 226 writ jurisdiction

M/S SWARN COSMETIC (INDIA) v. UNION OF INDIA

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9611-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner a hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A CGST Act show cause notice natural justice

Shree Balajee Traders v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 71 & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9612-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for failure to afford the petitioner an opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant show cause notice Section 168A GST Act natural justice opportunity to be heard

M/S HARI CATERING SERVICES v. Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9624

Delhi High Court granted a 7-month extension to a catering stall licensee at Mahesana Railway Station, affirming its jurisdiction and relying on prior similar orders under the uniform Indian Railways Catering Policy, 2017.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Catering Policy 2017 Indian Railways territorial jurisdiction Article 226

Seema Devi & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9623

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to file a regularization application for unauthorized construction and restrained demolition pending its consideration with a personal hearing under Section 248 of the Cantonment Act, 2006.

administrative petition_dismissed Cantonment Act 2006 Section 248 regularization unauthorized construction

Jyoti Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9622

The Delhi High Court granted petitioners liberty to seek temporary desealing of properties sealed for unauthorized construction, subject to compliance with MCD directions and regularization procedures.

administrative other sealing of property unauthorized construction Municipal Corporation of Delhi temporary desealing

Rashtriya Rajdhani Kshetra Tipahiya Chalak Union Delhi Regd v. The Union of India & Ors.

31 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9621

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to allow auto-taxi operators to continue parking at Anand Vihar Railway Station on payment of prescribed charges and submission of declarations, restraining arbitrary displacement or additional charges without a reasoned order.

administrative petition_allowed auto-taxi stand Anand Vihar Railway Station parking charges reasoned order