Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
United India Insurance Company Limited v. Competition Commission of India
The Delhi High Court held that interest on penalty under CCI regulations cannot be levied during the period of stay granted by the appellate tribunal, and the original penalty order merges into the appellate order for enforcement purposes.
Savitri Devi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Central Government to grant pension and arrears under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme to the petitioner as the widow of a verified freedom fighter.
Mapex Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting EPC Contractor claims due to lack of evidentiary support, affirming limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act and employer liability for delay damages under the Contract Act.
Union of India v. M/S Jain Steel Industries & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting increased excise duty under a statutory variation clause but reduced the interest rate awarded, emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Ravinder Bhel & Anr. v. Vijay Behl (Since Decd) Thr Lrs & Ors.
The High Court allowed the appellants to withdraw their appeal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
Union of India & Ors. v. GP Capt Musunuru Anuroop Kumar Retd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for coronary artery disease, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service and directing broadbanding benefits from 2014.
Shri Gopal Kumar v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 75 BNS based on an amicable settlement between parties, imposing community service as a condition to secure ends of justice.
Vikas v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Sh Rai Singh @ Ray Singh and Ors. v. The State GNCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Mayank Goel & Ors. v. State Govt. of N.C.T of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties.
Hitesh Kumar v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside the order declaring the petitioner a Proclaimed Offender under Section 82 CrPC for lack of judicial satisfaction and procedural compliance, emphasizing the need for cogent reasons before depriving personal liberty.
Buta Ram and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside CAT orders granting pension benefits for prior Gramin Dak Sevak service, holding such service cannot be counted as qualifying service under CCS Pension Rules, following Supreme Court precedent.
Munna Lal Yadav v. Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of SBI's confirmation test and termination of a blind probationary officer who failed the test, ruling that reservation under the RPwD Act applies at recruitment stage but not mandatorily at confirmation, while emphasizing reasonable accommodation and the advisory nature of CCPwD recommendations.
Munna v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for attempted murder and robbery, rejecting the plea of sudden and grave provocation and affirming the sufficiency of prosecution evidence including victim's testimony and forensic reports.
Karan v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of attempted murder charges due to inconsistent injured witnesses' testimony, delay in naming the accused, and lack of corroborative evidence.
State v. Ram Swaroop & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the State's appeal, setting aside the acquittal and convicting the accused under Section 324 IPC read with Section 34 IPC, emphasizing the primacy of the injured witness's testimony despite minor contradictions.
LR no. 1 in person v. Shri Ram Gupta
The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to allow amendment of the written statement after trial commencement, holding that such amendments introducing new facts without due diligence are impermissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.
Shivam Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere abnormal liver function tests do not justify disqualification from Agniveervayu recruitment unless specific liver conditions are present, directing a re-examination of the petitioner by a competent medical board.
Hemant Kumar & Anr. v. Satya Dev Bharrel & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the amendment of pleadings after trial commencement to determine the controversy on ancestral property claims, setting aside the dismissal of the suit and restoring it for trial.
RCCIVL-RKIPL LLP v. RCC Infraventures Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral interim order directing payment of disputed sums as final relief beyond the tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 17, emphasizing strict limits on interim mandatory injunctions and judicial interference under Section 37.