Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Paramjit Kharb v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9638

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in a large-scale cyber-fraud syndicate, holding that sufficient prima facie evidence and the gravity of offences preclude bail at this stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cyber-fraud forged identity bank accounts

SI Rakesh Kumar v. BIMLA

03 Nov 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9637
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside bail granted to accused in an inter-state child trafficking case, emphasizing the gravity of offence, risk of evidence tampering, and non-application of judicial mind by the Trial Court.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant child trafficking bail cancellation inter-state crime syndicate destruction of evidence

Mohd Arif v. Amit Chaudhary & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9585

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tenant's revision petition, affirming eviction on grounds of bona fide requirement and established landlord-tenant relationship under the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Eviction Petition Bona fide requirement Landlord-tenant relationship

Om Saran Gupta v. State of NCT of Delhi & Nishi

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9635

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC against a petitioner whose marriage was declared null and void, holding that vague allegations without essential ingredients do not constitute offences and the proceedings were an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC criminal breach of trust Section 406 IPC quashing of FIR

Rasul Azam v. The State (Govt of NCT), Delhi & Anr.

03 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9665
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences under the POCSO Act, holding that the victim's age was conclusively proved by school records and testimony, and the prosecution established foundational facts to invoke statutory presumptions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act age determination school records Section 29 POCSO

Aman Chopra & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr

03 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9645

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple sections of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC non-compoundable offences

Anil Singh v. State

03 Nov 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9636

The High Court held that a Magistrate cannot summon an accused placed in Column No.12 of the chargesheet without new evidence, setting aside the impugned summoning order as an impermissible review of the earlier cognizance.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning accused Column No.12 chargesheet

Suparshva Swabs India v. AGN International & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:9625-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of interim injunction, holding that the plaintiff failed to establish goodwill in the mark "TULIPS" extending to perfumes and that the defendants’ use of "AGN TULIP" does not constitute infringement or passing off.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant trademark infringement passing off interim injunction generic mark

State v. Mohd Zahid

03 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9664

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 308 IPC, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the prosecution's failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies and lack of independent corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 378 CrPC appeal against acquittal double presumption of innocence

Infrastructure Watchdog v. Union of India and Ors

03 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:9577-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging OTS agreements between banks and a corporate borrower, holding that speculative allegations without cogent material do not justify judicial interference or directing investigations.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant public interest litigation One Time Settlement banking transactions commercial contracts

Directorate of Enforcement v. M/s Prakash Industries Ltd

03 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9626-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of a provisional attachment order under the PMLA, holding that attachment requires a registered predicate offence and nexus to proceeds of crime, and that procedural safeguards must be observed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Provisional Attachment Order Prevention of Money Laundering Act Predicate Offence Proceeds of Crime

Satya Prakash Bagla v. State & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambani · 2025:DHC:9595

The court clarified that 'coercive measures' in an interim order referred only to arrest or custodial interrogation and did not restrain freezing of bank accounts or ongoing investigation.

criminal other Significant coercive measures freezing bank accounts investigation section 106 BNSS

COURTS ON ITS OWN MOTION IN RE: SUICIDE COMMITTED BY SUSHANT ROHILLA v. Respondent

03 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2025:DHC:9600-DB

Delhi High Court dismissed abetment charges in a student's suicide case but mandated systemic reforms including grievance redressal and reconsideration of mandatory attendance norms in higher education.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant abetment to suicide Section 306 IPC Grievance Redressal Committee mandatory attendance

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Dilshad & Ors.

03 Nov 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:9689

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award applying Delhi minimum wages for loss of future earnings based on credible evidence that the claimant, though resident of Uttar Pradesh, earned livelihood in Delhi.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim loss of future earnings minimum wages place of work

Mohd Umar v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

01 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9603

The Delhi High Court held that amounts recovered in civil proceedings can be adjusted against compensation awarded under Section 138 NI Act in criminal proceedings, allowing proportional reduction of default sentence and directing the appellant's release.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act compensation adjustment default sentence Section 357 CrPC

Shakuntla Health Education Foundation v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University

01 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:9589

The Delhi High Court held that a nursing college situated on agricultural land is entitled to annual revalidation of NOC and affiliation based on correct assessment parameters under the 2016 policy guidelines, directing fresh inspection and affiliation grant upon compliance.

administrative petition_allowed Significant No Objection Certificate affiliation Joint Assessment Committee agricultural land

Charanjeet v. State (NCT of Delhi)

01 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2011 SCC OnLine Del 1980
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to causing grievous hurt under Section 308 IPC in a scuffle case, reducing sentence to time served.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 308 IPC Arms Act intention to cause death

Competition Commission of India v. Geep Industries & Ors.

01 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9632-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Competition Commission of India cannot levy interest on delayed penalty payments retrospectively without issuing a mandatory demand notice under the 2011 Regulations.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Competition Commission of India monetary penalty interest on penalty demand notice

Eshan Gupta and Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

01 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9576
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Vishal Chaudhary v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

01 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9572

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under multiple IPC sections based on a genuine amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC amicable settlement non-compoundable offences