Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Perpetual Vision LLP v. Vaibhav S Pingale

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10019-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an order issuing notice under Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC in an interim injunction application is a procedural interlocutory order and not appealable under Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC interim injunction appealability Commercial Courts Act 2015

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Sgt Krishna Kumar Tripathi

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that such disability is service-related unless rebutted by cogent evidence.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. v. Standard Casting Pvt. Ltd.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9911-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld arbitral awards enforcing liquidated damages clauses without requiring proof of actual loss, emphasizing limited judicial interference under the Arbitration Act.

commercial_arbitration appeal_allowed Significant liquidated damages Section 74 Indian Contract Act arbitral award judicial interference

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. M/S Motorola Inc

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9910-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of substantive objections under Section 34, emphasizing the limited scope of judicial interference in arbitral awards and the necessity of reasoned orders.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 37 Arbitral Award

Himmat Singh & Anr. v. Arup Sinha Roy

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9912-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree awarding brokerage commission to a real estate consultant who introduced the builder ultimately engaged by the property owners, affirming entitlement despite absence of a formal written contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant brokerage commission real estate consultancy commercial contract quantum meruit

Dalwinder Kaur & Anr. v. State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9961

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent to dissolve marriage, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498A IPC

Ankur Kohli and Others v. The State NCT of Delhi and Another

13 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9938

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Ravi Malik & Anr. v. State GNCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:9971

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR

Ram Snehi v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9990

The Delhi High Court altered the conviction from aggravated penetrative sexual assault to attempt under POCSO due to lack of proof of penetration, upheld wrongful confinement conviction, and reduced sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act aggravated penetrative sexual assault attempted sexual assault child victim testimony

DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD v. MAHANAGAR DELHI BHAWAN EVAM ANYA SANNIRAMAN MAZDOOR SANGH

13 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9965

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petition seeking condonation of over two years' delay in filing a written statement, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and rejecting government department's plea of counsel's negligence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC condonation of delay written statement limitation

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 Delhi v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd

13 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9908-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee must prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of unsecured loans under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act unsecured loan bogus loan identity creditworthiness genuineness

Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S Deen Dayal

13 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9906-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the appellant, holding such appointment invalid under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and emphasizing the need for impartiality and natural justice in arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Unilateral appointment Sole arbitrator

Gold Cause Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Anand Prakash Gupta

13 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9913

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a specific performance decree directing possession of altered commercial spaces with monetary adjustments, rejecting appellants' challenge based on forged documents and jurisdictional objections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance execution proceedings site plan alteration monetary adjustment

Sangeeta v. Hitesh Kumar

13 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9960

The Delhi High Court upheld the husband's exclusive ownership and possession of matrimonial property post-divorce, rejecting the wife's co-ownership claim and limiting her right to reside under domestic violence law.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant registered Sale Deed co-ownership shared household Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act

Mukesh v. Sachin

13 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:9901

The Delhi High Court held that compensation claims under the Employees’ Compensation Act are barred where the employee is covered and compensated under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, quashing the compensation order passed under the EC Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 53 ESI Act compensation

Ashish Kapoor v. Sangeeta Mehta

13 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9953

The court granted the judgment debtor a limited extension to vacate the property before executing possession warrants, emphasizing the finality of execution thereafter.

civil petition_allowed execution of possession warrants of possession judgment debtor reasonable time to vacate

Rajiv Sareen v. M/S Divyanshu Enterprises and Others

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9916-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a civil suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed is maintainable despite the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, as the DRT lacks jurisdiction over such claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI Order VII Rule 11 CPC cancellation of sale deed

Meenakshi Malhotra v. G.L. Tandon & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9919-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of a successor asserting derivative proprietary rights under Order I Rule 10 CPC in consolidated partition and probate proceedings to ensure complete adjudication despite objections of delay and pendency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment partition suit probate proceedings

Aakash Chaturbhuj Chhabria v. Hewlett Packard Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9918-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application for separation of trial and transfer, holding that the cause of action against all defendants was composite and the suit was maintainable in Delhi.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant composite cause of action joinder of parties territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC

Smt Meenakshi Oberg v. Sh. Karun Dube & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9917-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a civil suit for loan recovery due to failure to prove the loan agreement's authenticity and liability, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act and best evidence rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act best evidence rule loan agreement settlement agreement