Delhi High Court

29,724 judgments

Year:

Ram Snehi v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9990

The Delhi High Court altered the conviction from aggravated penetrative sexual assault to attempt under POCSO due to lack of proof of penetration, upheld wrongful confinement conviction, and reduced sentence accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act aggravated penetrative sexual assault attempted sexual assault child victim testimony

DELHI BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD v. MAHANAGAR DELHI BHAWAN EVAM ANYA SANNIRAMAN MAZDOOR SANGH

13 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9965

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petition seeking condonation of over two years' delay in filing a written statement, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and rejecting government department's plea of counsel's negligence.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order VIII Rule 1 CPC condonation of delay written statement limitation

Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4 Delhi v. KRBL Infrastructure Ltd

13 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9908-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the assessee must prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of unsecured loans under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act unsecured loan bogus loan identity creditworthiness genuineness

Central Warehousing Corporation v. M/S Deen Dayal

13 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:9906-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator unilaterally appointed by the appellant, holding such appointment invalid under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and emphasizing the need for impartiality and natural justice in arbitration proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Unilateral appointment Sole arbitrator

Gold Cause Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. Anand Prakash Gupta

13 Nov 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:9913

The Delhi High Court upheld the execution of a specific performance decree directing possession of altered commercial spaces with monetary adjustments, rejecting appellants' challenge based on forged documents and jurisdictional objections.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance execution proceedings site plan alteration monetary adjustment

Sangeeta v. Hitesh Kumar

13 Nov 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:9960

The Delhi High Court upheld the husband's exclusive ownership and possession of matrimonial property post-divorce, rejecting the wife's co-ownership claim and limiting her right to reside under domestic violence law.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant registered Sale Deed co-ownership shared household Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act

Mukesh v. Sachin

13 Nov 2025 · Chandrasekharan Sudha · 2025:DHC:9901

The Delhi High Court held that compensation claims under the Employees’ Compensation Act are barred where the employee is covered and compensated under the Employees’ State Insurance Act, quashing the compensation order passed under the EC Act.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 Section 53 ESI Act compensation

Ashish Kapoor v. Sangeeta Mehta

13 Nov 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:9953

The court granted the judgment debtor a limited extension to vacate the property before executing possession warrants, emphasizing the finality of execution thereafter.

civil petition_allowed execution of possession warrants of possession judgment debtor reasonable time to vacate

Rajiv Sareen v. M/S Divyanshu Enterprises and Others

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9916-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a civil suit for cancellation of a registered sale deed is maintainable despite the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act, as the DRT lacks jurisdiction over such claims.

civil appeal_allowed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI Order VII Rule 11 CPC cancellation of sale deed

Meenakshi Malhotra v. G.L. Tandon & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9919-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of a successor asserting derivative proprietary rights under Order I Rule 10 CPC in consolidated partition and probate proceedings to ensure complete adjudication despite objections of delay and pendency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC impleadment partition suit probate proceedings

Aakash Chaturbhuj Chhabria v. Hewlett Packard Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9918-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of an application for separation of trial and transfer, holding that the cause of action against all defendants was composite and the suit was maintainable in Delhi.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant composite cause of action joinder of parties territorial jurisdiction Section 20 CPC

Smt Meenakshi Oberg v. Sh. Karun Dube & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:9917-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a civil suit for loan recovery due to failure to prove the loan agreement's authenticity and liability, emphasizing strict compliance with Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act and best evidence rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Section 65-B Indian Evidence Act best evidence rule loan agreement settlement agreement

Bird Delhi General Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer II Avato, Ward 204, Zone 11 & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10075-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Super Skin Craft Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9949-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST tax demand orders for lack of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act show cause notice natural justice

Savitri Sharma & Anr. v. Bhagwani Devi & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10276

The Delhi High Court rejected the partition suit for lack of pleadings establishing an existing Hindu Undivided Family, holding that properties inherited after 1956 are self-acquired absent proof of an HUF.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Undivided Family HUF properties coparcenary rights Hindu Succession Act 1956

Ram Parkash v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10209

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner for unauthorized construction after he had sold the property and had no connection with the alleged offence, applying the principles in State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings Delhi Municipal Corporation Act unauthorized construction sale deed

Kanima v. State

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10162

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and conspiracy but modified her sentence to the period already served, reducing fines considering her remorse and socio-economic status.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant robbery possession of stolen property conspiracy sentence modification

Hitesh Rajpal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

12 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:9943

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for interest and compensation for delayed terminal benefits payment and held respondents jointly liable for timely disbursal.

civil petition_allowed Significant terminal benefits succession certificate interest on delayed payment compensation for delay

Sarvar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10131

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served considering his personal circumstances and custody period.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC Section 354D IPC Section 506 IPC conviction

H.G. International v. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10063-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed VAT assessment orders passed by non-jurisdictional audit officers lacking proper delegation and authorization under the DVAT Act, emphasizing the necessity of territorial jurisdiction and Form DVAT-50 authorization.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 VATO (Audit) jurisdiction Form DVAT-50