Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Bird Delhi General Aviation Services Pvt. Ltd. v. Sales Tax Officer II Avato, Ward 204, Zone 11 & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10075-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax demand order passed without hearing the petitioner, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of GST notifications pending before the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Super Skin Craft Private Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9949-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside ex-parte GST tax demand orders for lack of fair hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of extension notifications under Section 168A GST Act to the Supreme Court.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A GST Act show cause notice natural justice

Savitri Sharma & Anr. v. Bhagwani Devi & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:10276

The Delhi High Court rejected the partition suit for lack of pleadings establishing an existing Hindu Undivided Family, holding that properties inherited after 1956 are self-acquired absent proof of an HUF.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Hindu Undivided Family HUF properties coparcenary rights Hindu Succession Act 1956

Ram Parkash v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10209

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings against a petitioner for unauthorized construction after he had sold the property and had no connection with the alleged offence, applying the principles in State of Haryana v. Bhajanlal.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of criminal proceedings Delhi Municipal Corporation Act unauthorized construction sale deed

Kanima v. State

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10162

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and conspiracy but modified her sentence to the period already served, reducing fines considering her remorse and socio-economic status.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant robbery possession of stolen property conspiracy sentence modification

Hitesh Rajpal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

12 Nov 2025 · Avneesh Jhingan · 2025:DHC:9943

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for interest and compensation for delayed terminal benefits payment and held respondents jointly liable for timely disbursal.

civil petition_allowed Significant terminal benefits succession certificate interest on delayed payment compensation for delay

Sarvar v. The State Govt of NCT of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10131

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 354, 354D, and 506 IPC but modified the sentence to the period already served considering his personal circumstances and custody period.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC Section 354D IPC Section 506 IPC conviction

H.G. International v. The Commissioner of Trade and Taxes, Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10063-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed VAT assessment orders passed by non-jurisdictional audit officers lacking proper delegation and authorization under the DVAT Act, emphasizing the necessity of territorial jurisdiction and Form DVAT-50 authorization.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 VATO (Audit) jurisdiction Form DVAT-50

Arvind v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10121-DB

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's refusal to condone a 1180-day delay in filing an Original Application against an APAR, holding that vague reasons and counsel's inaction do not justify condonation of delay.

administrative petition_dismissed condonation of delay Annual Performance Appraisal Report Original Application Central Administrative Tribunal

Parmod @ Bihari v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10124

The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's conviction under Sections 394 and 397 IPC due to unreliable medical evidence but upheld conviction under Section 411 IPC for possession of stolen property, granting partial relief as the appellant had already served the sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery Section 394 IPC Section 397 IPC Section 411 IPC

Delhi Development Authority v. Deepak Jain

12 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10067-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order quashing a delayed Charge Memo against an engineer, holding that delay alone is not fatal if justified, and directed expeditious completion of disciplinary proceedings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant delay in disciplinary proceedings charge memo prejudice to defense disciplinary action

Mohsin Ahmad v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi); Neelam v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

12 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10114
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Sections 308/34 and 451/34 IPC but modified the sentence to release the appellants on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, emphasizing reformative justice.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 308 IPC Section 451 IPC common intention

Prakash Oil Corporation v. Delhi Development Authority

12 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10057

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' challenge to a demand for payment at prevalent market rates for land allotment, upholding earlier court directions and the DDA Rules, 1981.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority Disposal of Developed Nazul Land Rules, 1981 pre-determined rates prevalent market rates

Waraich v. Maneesh Kumar

12 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9996-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's direction for a fresh medical examination due to procedural deficiencies in prior medical boards, dismissing the petition challenging the order.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant medical examination medical fitness Central Administrative Tribunal Review Medical Examination Board

Firoj Khan v. Addl. Commissioner of Custom

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9992-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Customs authority's order confiscating undeclared gold jewellery and imposing penalty, permitting redemption on payment of fine and duty, while dismissing the petitioner's challenge to the order.

administrative petition_dismissed Customs Act, 1962 confiscation penalty undeclared goods

Sakshi Goyal Proprietor of Mis Parshavnath Industries v. Principal Commissioner Central GST, Delhi

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9993-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration for failure to consider amended business address and directed fresh adjudication with opportunity for personal hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation Show Cause Notice amendment of business address Input Tax Credit investigation

Mohammad Noman Rana v. The Commissioner of Custom & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9995-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that detention of gold bars without issuance of show cause notice and personal hearing under the Customs Act is unlawful, invalidated the waiver of these rights, and ordered release of the goods upon payment of customs duty.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 124 show cause notice personal hearing

Intzar Ahmad v. The Commissioner of Custom & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9997-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of Show Cause Notice and personal hearing under the Customs Act is unlawful, invalidating waivers signed by tourists and ordering release of seized gold bars.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Show Cause Notice Section 124 Section 110

Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, ICD PPG and Other ICDs

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9999-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court condoned delay and restored BSNL's appeal before CESTAT for merits hearing on penalty imposed under Customs Act despite procedural delay.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 condonation of delay penalty under Section 114A voluntary payment of duty

Mam Raj Hari Ram v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

12 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9946-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a GST demand order passed without personal hearing, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of related GST notifications to the Supreme Court's pending decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice principles of natural justice personal hearing