Delhi High Court

Through: Mr. Bhavesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate v. EMINENT INFRA DEVELOPERS PVT LTD & ANR

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, the court's role is limited to prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement and directed appointment of an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between the parties.

Mr.Tejpal in person (son of v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

The Court upheld the right of a major to choose his residence and directed inquiry into alleged illegal operation of a de-addiction centre, disposing of the habeas corpus petition accordingly.

Saggu and Mr. Manan Lohani, Advocates v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-APPROPRIATE AUTHORITY

The High Court dismissed the petitioner's second revision petition as not maintainable under Section 438(3) of BNSS, barring multiple revisions on the same matter before different forums.

Through: Mr. Jayant Bhatt, Advocate v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Through: Mr. Aman Akhtar, Advocate v. STATE NCT OF DELHI

Through: Mr. Vikram Hegde, Advocate v. NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU

Advocates v. STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI)

Through: Mr. Yash Aggarwal with Ms. Chitrakshi, Advocates v. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE DELHI & ORS

VISION DIAGNOSTIC INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. ALL INDIA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES & ANR

CAPT. ASHOK KUMAR MALHOTRA (RETD.) v. BORDER SECURITY FORCE & ORS

Email: shohitc@gmail.com v. Mr. Deepak Luthra

J P GAUTAM v. For the

Through: Mr. Sandeep Bajaj, Ms. Shruti Kanodia, Mr. Rishabh Dua, Mr. Kshitij Ujala, Mr. Maya Bihani, Advs v. ICICI BANK LIMITED AND ORS

Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, Mr. Rehan Bhasin & Ms. Aparajita Jha, Advs v. NARESH KUMAR GUGNANI (SINCE DECEASED THR LRS)

Singhal and Mr. Lakshay Yadav Advocates.) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Advocates.) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Singhal and Mr. Lakshay Yadav Advocates.) v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Through: Mr. Shivesh Kaushik with Mr. Abhiraj Ray, Advocates v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Atal and Manoj Kumar Advocate.) v. UNION OF INDIA

Adv v. KUSH INNOVATIVE FOUNDATION