Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:

Neeraj Guglani v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-15 & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:10004-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of condonation of delay in filing income tax return due to petitioner’s medical illness and accountant’s mistake, directing fresh consideration with a reasoned order under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 119(2)(b) Income Tax Act condonation of delay genuine hardship medical illness

R B Bhasin v. Delhi Development Authority

13 Nov 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:10432

The Delhi High Court held that where DDA delays allotment due to its own fault, the flat price payable is that prevailing on the writ petition filing date, and interest cannot be charged for the delay.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Delhi Development Authority Demand-cum-Allotment Letter Wrong Address Policy price fixation

Pawan @ Puran Chand & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:10379

The Delhi High Court quashed a non-compoundable matrimonial offence FIR under Section 498A IPC based on an amicable settlement, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent powers Section 528 BNSS

SI Vikram, PS Timarpur v. Daya Shankar

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10211

The High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rash driving case due to material contradictions in eyewitness testimony and the principle of double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal double presumption of innocence eyewitness testimony material contradictions

S S Bankers Association and Anr v. Union of India and Ors

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10175-DB

The Delhi High Court clarified the correct application of Regulation 26 of the Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995, directing the Bank of India to add specified additional qualifying service for pension computation and pay arrears to eligible retired employees.

labor petition_allowed Significant Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995 Regulation 26 qualifying service pension computation

Vikas Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10187

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a POCSO case due to hostile witnesses, discrepancies in forensic evidence chain of custody, and contradictions undermining the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act Section 10 POCSO DNA evidence chain of custody

Dr. Paramjit Singh Nagi v. Union of India and Ors

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:10050-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw his writ petition challenging a transfer order after the transfer was reversed and posting order cancelled, leaving open the option to revive the petition if aggrieved again.

administrative petition_allowed transfer order writ petition administrative discretion judicial review

Baba Bamdev Ram v. State of NCT of Delhi

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10171

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of rape and criminal intimidation charges due to inconsistencies in the prosecutrix's testimony and lack of corroborative medical evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant rape Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC prosecutrix testimony

SANDISK LLC v. M/S. WELBORN INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

13 Nov 2025 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2025:DHC:10169

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction against a defendant for trade dress and trademark infringement after the defendant discontinued the impugned packaging and undertook not to use confusingly similar trade dress in future.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trade dress infringement trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction

Rajvir v. State

13 Nov 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:10158

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction under Section 15(b) NDPS Act for possession of 15 kg poppy straw but modified the sentence to the period already served in light of the appellant's remorse and Supreme Court directions.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 15(b) Section 50 notice conscious possession

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex JWO Rajiw Kumar Mishra

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired airman, affirming the presumption that disabilities detected post-entry are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Release Medical Board presumption of service connection

Union of India & Ors. v. No. 14634971 Hav Sajiraj R (Retd)

13 Nov 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 318 (2025) DLT 711
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension to a retired soldier, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising post-entry are service-related unless disproved by the employer, and clarified the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Total Retinal Detachment Traumatic Cataract

M/S. DELHI AUTOMOBILE LTD. v. M/S. TANEJA DEVELOPERS AND INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.

13 Nov 2025 · ANIL KSHETARPAL; HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 723
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint disclosing a cause of action cannot be rejected at the threshold under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely because the defendant disputes fulfillment of contractual conditions or alleges revocation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action specific performance plaint rejection

Manish Sharma v. Additional Commissioner of Customs

13 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10116-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging Customs penalty and confiscation orders, holding that alternate statutory remedies must be exhausted and that a Power of Attorney holder complicit in misdeclaration is liable for penalty.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Article 226 Power of Attorney Penalty under Section 114AA

Government of NCT of Delhi v. Deep Chand & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10098-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order granting retrospective promotion benefits to employees redeployed after closure of DEDA, dismissing the Government's challenge to the promotion's legality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant retrospective promotion Central Administrative Tribunal pay scale benefits redeployment

The Commissioner of Police and Ors. v. Sheotaj Singh

13 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10096-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal's order setting aside departmental proceedings against a police officer, holding that allegations arising from a civil dispute without clear misconduct do not warrant disciplinary action.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry misconduct civil dispute contradictory reports

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Kamlesh

13 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10068-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing payment of family pension with interest, holding that discrepancies in identity documents cannot justify withholding pension and the employer remains liable despite delays caused by its authorized bank.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant family pension date of birth discrepancy interest on delayed pension authorized bank

Perfect Industries v. Goods and Service Tax Officer, Delhi Department of Trade and Taxes & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10069-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order due to non-communication of notices on the GST portal and remanded the matter for fresh hearing, leaving the validity of extension notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Show Cause Notice Natural Justice Section 168A GST Act

Myratgeldi Mammedov v. Union of India & Anr.

13 Nov 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:10064-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking release of a gold chain confiscated for smuggling, upholding the Customs Department's Order-in-Original and rejecting claims of illegal detention and arrest.

administrative petition_dismissed Customs Act, 1962 Section 104 smuggling gold confiscation

Union of India & Anr. v. Neeraj Prasad & Ors.

13 Nov 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:10066-DB

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Tribunal's three-month timeline for holding a promotion committee, holding that extension of time must be sought before the Tribunal itself.

administrative appeal_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal Departmental Promotion Committee extension of time promotion