Delhi High Court
102,696 judgments
Hitesh Sood and Anr v. Union of India through Secretary & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed re-determination and payment of fair compensation under the 2013 Act for land acquired in 1969 where possession was taken but compensation remained unpaid for over five decades.
Danish Ahmed v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking allotment of a Tehbazari site, holding that the petitioner had no locus standi after transferring his rights to another person.
Mohd Asad v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking allotment of a relocated Tehbazari site as the petitioner had validly transferred his rights and failed to disclose material documents, thereby lacking locus standi.
Komal Kumar v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Bail was denied to a call centre partner accused of orchestrating cyber-enabled fraud against Japanese victims due to the risk of influencing witnesses and strong prima facie evidence.
Suresh Babu v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking protection from dispossession of a vending site due to suppression of prior litigation facts and non-participation in the statutory survey process.
Hari Rajmanikkam v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the Election Commission's authority to verify founding members of a political party under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, dismissing the petition challenging the verification process.
SH SHAHID v. SH SATISH & ORS
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding loss of future income based on medical evidence of 40% disability, applying established principles from Pranay Sethi.
Satya Prakash Ravidas v. The Secretary Bar Council of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging the authorization of advocates representing a registered society, holding that such issues lie within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Civil Court and disciplinary action against advocates lies with the Bar Council.
Mukul Mittal v. Sr. Superintendent Policy Regional Passport Office
The Delhi High Court held that passports must be renewed in accordance with court orders permitting renewal during pending criminal proceedings, rejecting the requirement of specific permission to depart from India as a precondition.
Paharpur Cooling Towers Ltd v. Ramagundam Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of forfeited earnest money deposit, holding that State action based on revoked forgery allegations was arbitrary and violative of natural justice under Article 14.
All India Pickleball Association v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Ministry's recognition of the Indian Pickleball Association as the National Sports Federation, validating the relaxation clause in the Sports Code and emphasizing policy discretion in promoting emerging sports.
M/S RHINE POWER PVT. LTD. v. M/S RAMPRASTHA PROMOTERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court allowed deferment of arbitration proceedings pending contempt adjudication to prevent prejudice arising from the respondent's willful violation of interim injunction orders affecting the arbitration's subject matter.
Satya Prakash Ravidas v. Alakh Niranjan Prasad Singhna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes concerning the internal management of a registered society fall outside writ jurisdiction and must be adjudicated by civil courts, limiting the Registrar of Societies to a purely administrative role.
Vikas Prakash Gupta v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India
Delhi High Court reduced the one-year suspension of an Insolvency Professional imposed by IBBI for fee payment irregularities, holding the penalty disproportionate and emphasizing limited judicial interference in disciplinary matters.
Chayan Ghosh Chowdhury v. Punjab and Sind Bank
The Delhi High Court upheld the CIC's denial of RTI disclosure of a bank official's service records under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, holding that no larger public interest justified overriding the right to privacy.
Yangchen Drakmargyapon v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a person born in India between 1950 and 1987 to Tibetan refugee parents is an Indian citizen by birth under Section 3(1)(a) of the Citizenship Act, 1955, entitled to an Indian passport without requiring naturalization or registration.
Anchal Dubey & Anr. v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a petition seeking police protection for a married couple apprehending threats from family, relying on State assurances of police vigilance and contact availability.
Pradeep Kanojia v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under serious offences based on a genuine settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.
Shri Ashish Kashyap & Anr. v. State N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Pooja v. Mr Neeraj & Ors
The High Court restored a revision petition dismissed for non-appearance and non-deposit of costs, holding that such dismissal does not require notice and the High Court can restore the petition when the Revisional Court lacks power to do so.