Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Randeep Singh @ Rana v. State of Haryana

22 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 887
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to inadmissibility of key evidence and failure to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, emphasizing strict adherence to evidentiary rules.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant CCTV footage admissibility Section 65B Indian Evidence Act Confession to police inadmissible Section 27 Indian Evidence Act

Ramakant Ambalal Choksi v. Harish Ambalal Choksi & Others

22 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 913
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court restored the trial court's grant of temporary injunction restraining transfer of suit property, holding that the High Court erred in substituting its discretion without demonstrating perversity or illegality.

civil appeal_allowed Significant temporary injunction interlocutory order Order 39 CPC Order 43 CPC

Ramachandran v. Vijayan

22 Nov 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 885
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that property allotted to a single female on partition under Marumakkathayam law is her separate property, not tharwad property, and affirmed the lower courts' decree recognizing the disputed properties as tharwad property held by a thavazhi.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Marumakkathayam law tharwad property thavazhi partition

Sonu Agnihotri v. Chandra Shekhar & Ors.

22 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 888

The Supreme Court expunged unwarranted adverse remarks against a judicial officer made by the Delhi High Court, emphasizing restraint in judicial criticism and protecting judicial dignity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant judicial conduct adverse remarks expungement judicial independence

Naeem Bano Alias Gaindo v. Mohammad Rahees & Anr.

22 Nov 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 1000

The Supreme Court held that the Parliamentary amendment to Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act overrides the earlier Uttar Pradesh amendment under Article 254, directing the High Court to decide the ejectment petition on merits without awaiting a larger Bench's decision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 254 Constitution of India repugnancy Transfer of Property Act Section 106 Concurrent List

NITIN MAHADEO JAWALE & ORS v. BHASKAR MAHADEO MUTKE

22 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 902

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 4½ year delay in filing a written statement, emphasizing the litigant's duty to be vigilant and rejecting negligence of advocate as sufficient ground for condonation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay written statement advocate negligence litigant vigilance

K.S. MURALIDHAR v. R. SUBBULAKSHMI

22 Nov 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 886
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for future prospects and pain and suffering in a motor accident claim involving 100% permanent disability, applying the 50% future prospects rule and emphasizing just and fair non-pecuniary damages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects pain and suffering permanent disability

M/S AJAY PROTECH PVT. LTD v. GENERAL MANAGER & ANR.

22 Nov 2024 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2024 INSC 889

The Supreme Court held that courts can extend the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A(4) even after expiry of the statutory period if sufficient cause exists, allowing extension due to COVID-19 related delays.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A Extension of arbitral tribunal mandate Sufficient cause

M/S. ABT LIMITED v. T.R.K. SARAWATHY

21 Nov 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 884

The Supreme Court held that the buyer was not ready and willing to perform the contract and dismissed her suit for specific performance, restoring the Trial Court's decision and clarifying principles on time being essence and readiness in property sale agreements.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance time essence of contract ready and willing cancellation of agreement

SURESHBHAI BHADABHAI PANSURIYA v. THE STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

21 Nov 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 1057

The Supreme Court upheld the maintainability of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where cheques issued under a valid agreement were dishonoured, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to quash criminal proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque legally enforceable debt Memorandum of Understanding

Kallakuri Pattabhiramaswamy v. Kallakuri Kamaraju

21 Nov 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 883

The Supreme Court upheld that a Hindu female's absolute ownership under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act applies only to property traceable to a pre-existing right such as maintenance, and a life interest created additionally does not confer absolute ownership, dismissing the appeal for full ownership over disputed properties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14(1) Section 14(2) life interest

Rajneesh Kumar v. Ved Prakash

21 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 891
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's refusal to condone a 534-day delay in filing an appeal, holding that a litigant cannot disown their advocate's negligence and must approach the court with clean hands.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay negligence of advocate limitation clean hands doctrine

Manjit Singh & Anr v. Darshana Devi & Ors

21 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 895

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decree for specific performance, holding that subsequent purchasers who fail to prove bona fide purchase without notice under Section 19(b) of the Specific Relief Act are not protected and must perform the original contract.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance bona fide purchaser Section 19 Specific Relief Act good faith

Shambhu Chauhan v. Ram Kirpalalias Chirkut

21 Nov 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 882
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision dismissing a claim to disputed land due to failure to prove paternity and held that revisional interference with well-supported findings of fact is impermissible under the U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant U.P. Consolidation of Holding Act, 1953 Section 48 revision powers burden of proof paternity Article 226 jurisdiction

Sunny @ Santosh Dharmu Bhosale v. State of Maharashtra

20 Nov 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 878

The Supreme Court altered the appellant's conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, sentencing him to the period already undergone.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC murder culpable homicide

M/S BHARTI AIRTEL LTD. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, PUNE

20 Nov 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 880

The Supreme Court held that mobile towers and prefabricated buildings used by telecom service providers qualify as capital goods or inputs under the CENVAT Credit Rules, entitling them to claim CENVAT credit on excise duties paid.

tax appeal_allowed Significant CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 capital goods inputs mobile towers

M.R. Ajayan v. State of Kerala & Ors.

20 Nov 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 881

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing criminal proceedings for tampering with court evidence under Section 195(1)(b) CrPC and restored the trial, affirming liberal locus standi for third parties and the High Court's power to direct investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 195 CrPC cognizance tampering with evidence locus standi

Hetram @ Babli v. State of Rajasthan & Anr.

20 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 903
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that power under Section 319 CrPC to summon an additional accused must be exercised only if the evidence, including cross-examination, prima facie implicates the person, and set aside the High Court order summoning the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summons to additional accused prima facie case examination-in-chief

Prashant v. State of NCT of Delhi

20 Nov 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 879
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 IPC, holding the relationship was consensual and continuation of prosecution would be an abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR consent rape

Siddique v. State of Kerala & Anr

19 Nov 2024 · Bela M. Trivedi; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2024 INSC 877

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused in a delayed sexual offence complaint, emphasizing delay and complainant's conduct as relevant factors and imposing conditions to safeguard investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. Section 376 IPC Section 506 IPC