Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

The State of Punjab v. M/S Ferrous Alloy Forgings P Ltd.

19 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 890
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a sale certificate issued after court-confirmed auction sale is not liable to stamp duty at issuance and does not require registration, dismissing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sale certificate auction sale stamp duty registration

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS v. NAVIN KUMAR SINHA

19 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 874
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

Disciplinary proceedings initiated after an officer's superannuation or expiry of extended service are void ab initio; only proceedings initiated before cessation of service may be continued post retirement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceeding superannuation charge memo State Bank of India Officers’ Service Rules, 1992

Leela Agrawal v. Sarkar & Anr.

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 946
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a mortgage deed with a condition converting it into an absolute sale upon default is valid under Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for redemption due to non-payment within the stipulated period.

civil appeal_allowed Significant mortgage by conditional sale Section 58(c) Transfer of Property Act equity of redemption clog on equity of redemption

Rajiv Verghese v. Rose Chakkrammankkil

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 876

The Supreme Court restored the Family Court's interim maintenance order of Rs.1,75,000 per month to the wife, holding that the High Court erred in reducing it by ignoring substantial income and assets of the husband.

family appeal_allowed Significant interim maintenance Indian Divorce Act 1869 income assessment standard of living

State of Haryana v. Amin Lal

19 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 875
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that the State cannot claim adverse possession against its own citizens and upheld the plaintiffs' ownership based on revenue records and title documents, dismissing the State's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant adverse possession State property rights Order VIII Rule 5 CPC revenue records

Satyendra Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh

18 Nov 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 873

The Supreme Court held that recording of oral evidence in departmental inquiries proposing major penalty is mandatory, and failure to do so vitiates the inquiry and penalty, thereby restoring the Tribunal's quashing of the penalty imposed on the appellant.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry major penalty Rule 7(3) Uttar Pradesh Government Servant Rules 1999 oral evidence

Gurmeet Singh v. State of Punjab

18 Nov 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 872
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court held that work-charged service must be counted for Proficiency Step-up benefits under the 1988 Scheme, and denying such benefits to similarly situated employees violates Article 14.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Proficiency Step-up Scheme, 1988 work-charged employees regularisation of service Article 14

Sonam Lakra v. State of Chhattisgarh

14 Nov 2024 · Surya Kant; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 901

The Supreme Court reinstated a female Sarpanch removed without due process, emphasizing the protection of elected representatives' democratic rights and condemning administrative misuse of power.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sarpanch removal natural justice administrative overreach female empowerment

Ramachandra Reddy v. Ramulu Ammal

14 Nov 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 868
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court restored the trial and first appellate courts' finding that a 1963 family settlement deed conferring two-thirds property share was valid consideration-based settlement, overturning the High Court's recharacterization as a gift deed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant settlement deed gift deed consideration family arrangement

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA & ORS v. OM PARKASH

13 Nov 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 870
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld termination of an employee for abandonment of service without formal inquiry where the employee absented for over 90 days and concealed subsequent employment, setting aside the High Court's relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant abandonment of service LIC Staff Regulation 1960 termination without inquiry service of notice

Ganapati Bhikarao Naik v. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited

13 Nov 2024 · Hrishikesh Roy; S.V.N. Bhatti · 2024 INSC 871

The Supreme Court reinstated a Labour Court Award granting reinstatement to an employee appointed under a land acquisition rehabilitation scheme, holding that factual findings on marriage and entitlement should not be disturbed without compelling reasons.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Labour Court Award rehabilitation package land acquisition employment termination

Didde Srinivas v. State SHO, Podduru Police Station and Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 892

The Supreme Court confirmed convictions under Sections 451 and 354 IPC, reduced the sentence under Section 354 IPC from two to one year, and upheld concurrent sentences based on credible evidence and proportionality in sentencing.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 451 IPC Section 354 IPC House-trespass Intention to commit offence

Tinku v. State of Haryana & Ors.

13 Nov 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 867
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a delayed compassionate appointment claim as time barred under Haryana government policy but allowed the widow to claim ex-gratia financial assistance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment ex-gratia scheme time bar promissory estoppel

In Re: Directions in the matter of demolition of structures

13 Nov 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 866
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that demolitions of accused persons' properties without due process violate constitutional principles and framed pan-India procedural guidelines to prevent arbitrary executive action.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant demolition of property due process of law rule of law separation of powers

Shyam Kumar Inani v. Vinod Agrawal

12 Nov 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 865

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of Agreements to Sell with full payment and possession, set aside the High Court's dismissal, and decreed specific performance against the legal heirs who failed to execute sale deeds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance agreement to sell power of attorney burden of proof

M/s Siddamsetty Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. Katta Sujatha Reddy

08 Nov 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 861
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court in review held that the suit for specific performance was within limitation, the petitioner was ready and willing to perform, and the doctrine of lis pendens applies from institution of proceedings, thereby allowing specific performance and setting aside the earlier judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance limitation time is of essence readiness and willingness

Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. M/s ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV) A Joint Venture Company

08 Nov 2024 · Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud · 2024 INSC 857
Cites 1 · Cited by 31

The Supreme Court held that arbitration appointment procedures allowing unilateral appointment or control of arbitrator panels by one party violate mandatory provisions and constitutional equality, affirming the necessity of impartiality and equal treatment at the appointment stage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12(5) Section 18 Party autonomy

LIFEFORCE CRYOBANK SCIENCES INC v. CRYOVIVA BIOTECH PVT. LTD.

08 Nov 2024 · D. Y. Chandrachud; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 860

The Supreme Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must confine itself to existence of arbitration agreement and refer disputes on assignment and privity to the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator assignment of contract

M/S CRYSTAL TRANSPORT PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. A FATHIMA FAREEDUNISA & ORS.

08 Nov 2024 · Manoj Misra; Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud; J.B. Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 859

The Supreme Court upheld the remand directing fresh evidence and cross-examination in a partnership dissolution dispute, affirming the outgoing partner's right to profits from firm assets used post dissolution under Section 37 of the Indian Partnership Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partnership dissolution Indian Partnership Act 1932 Section 37 IPA final decree

Rajive Raturi v. Union of India

08 Nov 2024 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; J. B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 858

The Supreme Court held that mandatory accessibility standards under the RPWD Act and Rules are enforceable fundamental rights obligations requiring proactive state action to ensure inclusive access for persons with disabilities.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Accessibility Persons with Disabilities Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Rule 15 RPWD Rules