Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Dechamma I.M. @ Dechamma Koushik v. The State of Karnataka

04 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 972

The Supreme Court held that a woman in a romantic relationship outside marriage is not a "relative" under Section 498A IPC and quashed criminal proceedings against her for alleged dowry harassment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC relative definition dowry harassment quashing of criminal proceedings

Kabir Shankar Bose v. State of West Bengal

04 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Pankaj Mithal · 2024 INSC 930

The Supreme Court transferred investigation of politically sensitive FIRs against the petitioner from local police to the CBI to ensure a fair and credible probe.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant fair investigation transfer of investigation CBI political vendetta

HARE RAM YADAV v. STATE OF BIHAR

03 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 936

The Supreme Court partly allowed the appeal by reducing the conviction from murder under Section 302 IPC to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 IPC, granting the appellant the benefit of grave and sudden provocation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC Section 300 IPC murder

Irfan Khan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

03 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 924

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against the appellant for possession of a buttondar knife, holding mere possession without prohibited intent under the Arms Act and related notifications is not an offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Arms Act, 1959 buttondar knife DAD Notification 1980 possession of arms

Union of India v. Saroj Devi

03 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 921
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that death due to illness caused by extreme climatic conditions during active military duty near the Line of Control qualifies as a battle casualty, entitling the widow to Liberalised Family Pension.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Liberalised Family Pension battle casualty physical casualty Army Order 1 of 2003

Shubra P Kandpal v. State of Uttarakhand

03 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 982

The Supreme Court quashed cross FIRs under IPC and SC/ST Act based on a settlement between parties and clarified that caste-based offences under the SC/ST Act require sole causation by caste, invoking Article 142 to end proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC SC/ST Act Article 142 Constitution quashing of FIR

Oachira Parabrahma Temple v. G. Vijayanathakurup

03 Dec 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 922

The Supreme Court appointed a new Administrative Head to conduct elections for the Oachira Parabrahma Temple administration, modified the High Court's removal of elected committees, and directed expeditious Scheme framing, emphasizing adherence to bye-laws and preservation of the temple.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Administrative Head Temple administration Bye-laws Functus officio

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Jagat Ram

03 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 952

The Supreme Court held that irregularities in sanction for prosecution under the Prevention of Corruption Act do not vitiate conviction unless failure of justice is occasioned, and remanded the matter for reconsideration on this issue.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant sanction for prosecution Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 19 failure of justice

Wadla Bheemaraidu v. State of Telangana

03 Dec 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 923

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove the chain of circumstantial evidence and the disclosure statement under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act as per law.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 27 Indian Evidence Act disclosure statement DNA profiling

Ashok v. State of Uttar Pradesh

02 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 919

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant due to failure to put material evidence under Section 313 CrPC and denial of effective legal aid, emphasizing the fundamental right to a fair trial.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 313 CrPC legal aid fair trial rape and murder

Bastiram v. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation

02 Dec 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 934

The Supreme Court awarded compensation to a dismissed employee, modifying the High Court's order on jurisdiction without deciding the issue, thereby resolving a long-pending labor dispute.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dismissal from service civil court jurisdiction Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 natural justice

Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith v. Government of Gujarat

02 Dec 2024 · J. K. Maheshwari; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 935

The Supreme Court held that under the applicable pension scheme, the State Government alone is liable to pay retiral benefits to an employee of a Grant-in-Aid institution, rejecting the institution's liability despite its litigation conduct.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Grant-in-Aid institution retiral benefits pension liability State Government liability

Jayanandan v. Suresh Kumar

02 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 956
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a trial court decree cannot be set aside solely on amended pleadings without recording evidence, remanding the matter for reconsideration with opportunity for evidence on the new claim of prescriptive easement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC prescriptive easement evidence

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Ramkumar Choudhary

29 Nov 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 932
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed the State's appeal due to unexplained inordinate delay in filing the second appeal, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws and accountability of State officials.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay sufficient cause limitation period State litigation

Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University v. Monika

29 Nov 2024 · Dipankar Datta; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 911
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that experience gained as outsourced manpower in a government department qualifies for experience marks in recruitment, affirming the High Court’s order directing appointment of the candidate.

service_law appeal_dismissed Significant experience marks outsourced manpower sanctioned post recruitment advertisement

Kamaruddin Dastagir Sanadi v. State of Karnataka

29 Nov 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2024 INSC 908

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of abetment of suicide and cheating charges, holding that mere refusal to marry without instigation does not constitute abetment under Section 306 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC cheating Section 417 IPC

Anek Singh v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr

28 Nov 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 915

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and directed compensation for land acquired near Mathura refinery at Rs. 15 per sq. meter, overruling lower courts that awarded lower compensation based solely on soil quality.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Compensation Circle rates Agricultural land

S. N. DUBEY v. RAMAN KHANDELWAL

28 Nov 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 931

The Supreme Court set aside NGT orders declaring a no development zone for Bajrang Nagar Pahadi, holding that the NGT erred in relying solely on a Court Commissioner's report without independent consideration of objections and material.

environmental appeal_allowed Significant National Green Tribunal Court Commissioner report catchment area no development zone

Suresh Chandra Tiwari & Anr. v. State of Uttarakhand

28 Nov 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; Manoj Misra · 2024 INSC 907
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants in a murder case due to failure of prosecution to establish a complete chain of circumstantial evidence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen alive disclosure statement recovery of incriminating articles

Tulasareddi @ Mudakappa & Anr. v. The State of Karnataka & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Vipul M. Pancholi · 2026 INSC 67
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's conviction and restored the Trial Court's acquittal in a murder case due to failure of the prosecution to prove conspiracy and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant criminal conspiracy circumstantial evidence confessional statement eyewitness reliability