Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

K. S. Mehta v. M/S Morgan Securities and Credits Pvt. Ltd.

04 Mar 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 315
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that non-executive directors without specific allegations of involvement cannot be held liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and quashed criminal proceedings against them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 141 Negotiable Instruments Act vicarious liability non-executive director liability

Mukesh Prasad Singh v. The Then Rajendra Agricultural University

04 Mar 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 312

The Supreme Court held that non-exercise of option to join the Contributory Provident Fund scheme entitles a university employee to pension and related retiral benefits under the General Provident Fund-cum-pension-cum-gratuity scheme.

labor appeal_allowed Significant General Provident Fund Contributory Provident Fund Pension Scheme Retiral Benefits

Suresh v. State Rep. by Inspector of Police

04 Mar 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 318

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to serious doubts about the reliability of the dying declaration and lack of corroborative evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC corroborative evidence benefit of doubt

Sharmila Velamur v. V. Sanjay

03 Mar 2025 · Surya Kant; Dipankar Datta; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 299

The Supreme Court held that comprehensive expert assessments are crucial to determine the decision-making capacity of a disabled adult in custody disputes, overruling a High Court order based solely on oral interaction and upholding the necessity of guardianship in the individual's best interests.

family appeal_allowed Significant intellectual disability guardianship custody dispute independent decision-making

Shabeen Ahmad v. State of Uttar Pradesh

03 Mar 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 307
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court cancelled bail of the father-in-law and mother-in-law accused in a dowry death case due to strong prima facie evidence, while upholding bail of sisters-in-law with less direct involvement, emphasizing stringent judicial scrutiny in bail matters involving dowry deaths.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC bail cancellation

Rajnish Singh @ Soni v. State of U.P. and Another

03 Mar 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 308
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings for rape based on a prolonged consensual relationship, holding that mere breach of promise to marry does not vitiate consent under Section 376 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant consent false promise of marriage rape Section 376 IPC

C. Kamalakkannan v. State of Tamil Nadu

03 Mar 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 309

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant, holding that conviction cannot rest solely on handwriting expert opinion without production and proof of the original disputed document.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant handwriting expert opinion original document secondary evidence Section 45 Evidence Act

V. Ravikumar v. S. Kumar

03 Mar 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 343

The Supreme Court held that limitation for challenging sale deeds executed under a power of attorney begins from the date of execution or knowledge of the transactions, not from the date of cancellation of the power of attorney, and accordingly dismissed the suit as barred by limitation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation power of attorney sale deeds cancellation of power of attorney

Devinder Kumar Bansal v. The State of Punjab

03 Mar 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 320

The Supreme Court upheld the denial of anticipatory bail to a public servant accused of demanding illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing stringent judicial approach against corruption and that anticipatory bail is a discretionary remedy granted only in exceptional cases.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 illegal gratification

Alok Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

03 Mar 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 300

The Supreme Court held that exclusion of visually impaired candidates from judicial service recruitment violates constitutional equality and the RPwD Act, mandating reasonable accommodation and inclusive recruitment practices.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act 2016 reasonable accommodation judicial service recruitment visually impaired candidates

The State of Goa & Anr v. Namita Tripathi

03 Mar 2025 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 306
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that washing and cleaning activities in a laundry constitute a manufacturing process under the Factories Act, 1948, restoring the complaint against the respondent for non-compliance with factory licensing requirements.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Factories Act, 1948 manufacturing process factory definition laundry business

K. Ramasamy v. R. Nallammal & Ors.

03 Mar 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 310

The Supreme Court held that unexplained and inordinate delay in setting aside an ex-parte decree cannot be condoned, restoring the decree of specific performance in favor of the plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant ex-parte decree specific performance condonation of delay equitable jurisdiction

Sudershan Singh Wazir v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Feb 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 281

The Supreme Court held that ex-parte stay of a discharge order is impermissible and directed the discharged accused to furnish bail pending revision, emphasizing the sanctity of liberty granted by discharge under Section 227 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant discharge order Section 227 CrPC stay of discharge revisional jurisdiction

Aditi Kumar Sharma v. State of Madhya Pradesh

28 Feb 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 289

The Supreme Court upheld the termination of two probationary women Judicial Officers by the Madhya Pradesh High Court, affirming the validity of performance-based termination subject to natural justice and rejecting claims of arbitrariness and discrimination.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant termination of probationary judicial officers Annual Confidential Report natural justice Article 14

THE CHIEF MANAGER, CENTRAL BANK OF INDIA v. M/s AD BUREAU ADVERTISING PVT. LTD.

28 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 288
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a borrower availing a project loan for commercial purposes is not a 'consumer' under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, and set aside the consumer forum's order awarding compensation for alleged deficiency in banking services.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 definition of consumer commercial purpose project loan

Narcotics Control Bureau v. Man Singh Verma

28 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 292
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the High Court lacks jurisdiction under Section 439 CrPC to award compensation during bail proceedings and set aside the compensation order for wrongful confinement.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 439 CrPC bail jurisdiction compensation for wrongful confinement NDPS Act

Sachin Yallappa Usulkar v. Vijayata

28 Feb 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2025 INSC 290

The Supreme Court absolved the minor appellant from liability in a fatal motor accident, upheld compensation awarded to claimants, and held the insurance company liable without recovery rights against the owner.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim minor driver liability rash and negligent driving compensation enhancement

Shetty v. M/S. Sahaj Ankur Realtors

28 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 294

The Supreme Court held that the complaint under the Consumer Protection Act was not barred by limitation due to a continuing cause of action involving escrow arrangements and restored the complaint for adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act limitation continuing cause of action escrow

Prabhavathi & Ors. v. The Managing Director

28 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 293
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that contributory negligence must be proven by evidence and enhanced compensation to the dependents of a deceased motor accident victim, rejecting the High Court's apportionment of fault and income assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence compensation assessment standard of proof

Abdul Wahid & Anr v. State of Rajasthan

28 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 295

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, investigative deficiencies, and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant eyewitness testimony benefit of doubt investigative lapses Section 302 IPC