Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

MENDAR SINGH @ VIJAY SINGH v. STATE OF BIHAR AND ANOTHER

10 Dec 2024 · B.R. GAVAI; K. V. VISWANATHAN · 2024 INSC 969
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a bail order cannot be recalled suo motu without clear allegations of violation of bail conditions, and restored bail granted to the appellant despite alleged suppression of criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail recall of bail suppression of criminal antecedents equitable relief

Chaduranga Kanthraj Urs and Anr. v. P. Ravi Kumar and Ors.

10 Dec 2024 · M. M. Sundresh; Aravind Kumar · 2024 INSC 957

The Supreme Court held that the State must issue TDRs strictly as per the Karnataka Stamp Act guidance value, rejected unauthorized valuation methods, recalled additional conditions, and allowed contempt petitions for wilful disobedience.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Transferable Development Rights TDR Rules 2016 Karnataka Stamp Act 1957 Section 45B

Banwari and Others v. Haryana State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited and Another

10 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 951

The Supreme Court held that applications under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for redetermination of compensation can be filed within three months from any award by the Reference Court, including those following the commencement of Section 28-A, and upheld enhanced compensation to appellants accordingly.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 28-A Compensation enhancement Limitation period

Dara Lakshmi Narayana & Others v. State of Telangana & Another

10 Dec 2024 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 953
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed a retaliatory and vague FIR under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Act filed in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing prevention of abuse of legal process and protecting innocent family members.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 498A IPC Dowry Prohibition Act quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC

JAMI VENKATA SURYAPRABHA v. TARINI PRASAD NAYAK

09 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 1001

The Supreme Court held that where the defendant denies the validity of an agreement and pleads additional facts, the defendant has the right to begin evidence under Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC, dismissing the plaintiff's petition to compel the defendant to begin.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XVIII Rule 1 CPC right to begin evidence specific performance agreement of sale

Ajay Kumar Jain v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr.

09 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 958
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that miscellaneous applications filed in disposed writ proceedings are generally not maintainable except for limited purposes and directed the petitioner to seek protection before the appropriate High Court.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant miscellaneous application disposed proceedings functus officio executory order

Syeda Noor Fatima Zaidi v. Heena Urooz & Ors.

09 Dec 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 1053

The Supreme Court restored the Trial Court’s declaration of the appellant as duly elected councillor after disqualification of the returned candidate, rejecting the High Court’s order for re-election in a multi-candidate municipal election.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant municipal corporation election election petition disqualification bogus nomination

Tej Bhan v. Ram Kishan

09 Dec 2024 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 945
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court recognized conflicting precedents on the interpretation of Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act and referred the matter to a larger bench for authoritative clarification on the proprietary rights of Hindu females in property acquired by will or in lieu of maintenance.

property other Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Section 14 absolute ownership limited estate

National Highway Authority of India v. G Athipathi and Others

09 Dec 2024 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2024 INSC 943
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that deputation service interrupted by repatriation and reappointment on direct recruitment cannot be counted continuously for promotion eligibility under NHAI service rules.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant deputation service promotion eligibility break in service direct recruitment

State of Maharashtra v. Pradeep Yashwant Kokade

09 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 947

The Supreme Court upheld commutation of death sentence to life imprisonment due to inordinate and unexplained delay in execution caused by the executive and Sessions Court, affirming that such delay violates Article 21 of the Constitution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant death sentence delay in execution mercy petition Article 21

Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel v. Union of India

09 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 942
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Supreme Court held that an army officer similarly situated to others granted permanent commission relief by the Armed Forces Tribunal is entitled to the same benefit despite not being a party to the earlier litigation, directing grant of permanent commission with consequential benefits.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant permanent commission age relaxation Army Dental Corps Armed Forces Tribunal

BIRMA DEVI v. SUBHASH

06 Dec 2024 · J. B. Pardiwala; J. R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 949
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that an executing court can grant possession to a decree-holder under a specific performance decree even without an express possession relief, relying on Sections 22 of the Specific Relief Act and 55 of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance possession executing court Section 22 Specific Relief Act

Tarun Dhameja v. Sunil Dhameja & Anr.

06 Dec 2024 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 973

The Supreme Court held that an arbitration clause requiring mutual consent for arbitrator appointment does not make arbitration optional and allowed the legal representative of a deceased partner to invoke arbitration with court-appointed arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause partnership dispute mutual consent appointment of arbitrator

Kunhimuhammed@ Kunheethu v. The State of Kerala

06 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 937

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder under Section 302 IPC, rejecting claims of lack of intent, private defense, and sentence reduction, affirming that inflicting fatal injuries sufficient to cause death constitutes murder regardless of premeditation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC culpable homicide private defense

P.J. Dharmaraj v. Church of South India

06 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 938

The Supreme Court upheld the retirement of a Director at sixty years, ruling that amended AICTE and UGC regulations increasing retirement age to sixty-five do not apply without State adoption and only benefit teaching staff.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant age of superannuation AICTE regulations UGC regulations private unaided minority educational institution

R. Manohara Murthy and Others v. Assistant Commissioner and Land Acquisition Officer

05 Dec 2024 · B.R. Gavai; K.V. Viswanathan
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court enhanced compensation for land acquisition by applying cumulative escalation to a base price from prior acquisitions, awarding Rs. 90,000 per acre with statutory benefits.

property appeal_allowed Significant land acquisition compensation market value escalation

P.N.D. PRASAD v. BILLA SATISH & OTHERS

05 Dec 2024 · B.V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2024 INSC 964
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a Trial Court's direction to reconsider an investigation in a protest petition must be construed as continuation of investigation and not reinvestigation, setting aside the High Court's order that invalidated such direction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant protest petition reinvestigation final police report Section 482 CrPC

Basudev Dutta v. The State of West Bengal and Others

05 Dec 2024 · J.K. Maheshwari; R. Mahadevan · 2024 INSC 940
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court set aside the termination of a government employee for violation of natural justice and directed payment of service benefits, emphasizing the need for reasoned orders and timely police verification.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant natural justice termination of service citizenship police verification

Akanksha Arora v. Tanay Maben

04 Dec 2024 · Pankaj Mithal; Sandeep Mehta · 2024 INSC 962

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot dismiss a Section 482 CrPC petition on the ground of alternative remedy under Section 397 CrPC and must convert it into a revision petition to decide on merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 397 CrPC interim maintenance inherent powers

IRFAN AKBANI v. THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH

04 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 981

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal to regularize MDS admissions of appellants who completed their courses despite procedural irregularities, emphasizing equitable treatment and public interest.

education appeal_allowed Significant MDS admission counselling process regularization of admission Article 226