Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Ayurved Shastra Seva Mandal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the refusal to grant admission permissions to Indian medical colleges for 2011-12 due to failure to meet minimum standards and rejected late admissions after the academic year had ended.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 AYUSH medical college admission minimum standards

Md. Faizan Ahmad @ Kalu v. State of Bihar

03 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a child abduction case due to lack of credible evidence, emphasizing that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction kidnapping suspicion vs proof criminal evidence

State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Mr. Justice Ramesh (Retd.)

02 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla · 2013 (1) SCALE 7

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions affirming that under the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, the Chief Justice's opinion has primacy in Lokayukta appointments, distinguishing it from the Karnataka Act where the Chief Minister's advice is primary.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Lokayukta appointment Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Chief Justice primacy

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 8

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Educare Charitable Trust v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Nov 2012 · A. K. Sikri

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a dental college's application to increase BDS seats due to lack of mandatory recognition at the time of application and affirmed the lawful exercise of discretion by the Central Government.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Dentists Act 1948 Dental Council of India Recognition of dental college Increase of admission capacity

Markio Tado v. Takam Sorang

27 Nov 2012 · G.S. Singhvi; H.L. Gokhale
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order voiding the appellant's election on booth capturing grounds, holding that impersonation and double voting are distinct from booth capturing and that the High Court erred in disregarding binding precedent and admitting unsupported evidence.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant booth capturing election petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 improper reception of votes

Arikala Narasa Reddy v. Venkata Ram Reddy Reddygari

20 Jul 2012 · Dr. B. S. Chauhan; J. Chelameswar; M. Y. Eqbal

The Supreme Court held that election disputes must be confined to pleaded issues, invalidated certain disputed votes for identification marks, resulting in a tie resolved by draw of lots, thereby declaring the appellant elected.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant election petition Representation of the People Act, 1951 ballot paper validity secrecy of ballot

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY v. U. DINAKAR

30 May 2012 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that a competent authority can lawfully rectify a mistaken pay scale in an appointment letter after due opportunity, rejecting the claim to a higher Central pay scale when appointed by direct recruitment on a State pay scale.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay scale correction appointment letter mistake direct recruitment Central pay scale

Ramesh Chand v. Suresh Chand

09 Apr 2012 · Aravind Kumar; Sandeep Mehta · 2025 INSC 1059
Cites 0 · Cited by 16

The Supreme Court held that an Agreement to Sell, General Power of Attorney, and Will do not confer title without a registered sale deed and proper proof, dismissing the plaintiff's suit for possession and protecting the bona fide purchaser's rights.

property appeal_allowed Significant Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Section 54 Section 53A Agreement to Sell

State of Madhya Pradesh v. Mahendra Alias Golu

08 Oct 2011 · Surya Kant; Hima Kohli
Cites 0 · Cited by 35

The Supreme Court held that the respondent's acts went beyond mere preparation and constituted an attempt to commit rape under Section 376(2)(f) read with Section 511 IPC, restoring his conviction and sentence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant attempt to commit rape preparation vs attempt Section 376 IPC Section 511 IPC

Jayaswamy v. State of Karnataka

12 Aug 2011 · Mohan M. Shantanagoudar; L. Nageswara Rao
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for causing grievous hurt but set aside his murder conviction, emphasizing that appellate courts should not disturb acquittals without substantial and compelling reasons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant acquittal appellate interference common intention grievous hurt

M/S NORTH EASTERN CHEMICALS INDUSTRIES (P) LTD. v. M/S ASHOK PAPER MILL (ASSAM) LTD.

21 Jul 2011 · Abhay S. Oka; Sanjay Karol · 2023 INSC 1059
Cites 6 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that appeals under the Jogighopa Act are not governed by Article 116 of the Limitation Act, and in absence of prescribed limitation, appeals must be filed within reasonable time, allowing the delayed appeal filed by the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Limitation Act, 1963 Article 116 Jogighopa Act, 1990 Commissioner of Payments

M/S. AJAR ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SATYANARAYAN SOMANI

03 Jun 2011 · JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR; DR D Y CHANDRACHUD

The Supreme Court held that renewal of a public lease is discretionary and must be exercised in public interest with transparency, setting aside a flawed lease renewal and conversion to freehold by UDA in favor of a private developer.

property appeal_allowed Significant lease renewal public land Ujjain Development Authority leasehold rights

Smt Sulekha Rani v. Union of India

28 Mar 2011 · Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud; Indira Banerjee
Cites 1 · Cited by 6

The Supreme Court held that discharge of an army personnel on medical grounds without an Invalidation Medical Board is illegal and directed grant of family pension treating service as continuing until death.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Invalidation Medical Board Army Rules 1954 medical discharge family pension

Delhi Development Authority v. Prithi Pal Singh

24 Dec 2010 · Kurian Joseph; Rohinton Fali Nariman
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Supreme Court held that actual physical possession is required under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act to deny de-notification and used its constitutional power under Article 142 to settle a decades-old land dispute by allocating part of the land to DDA and the remainder to the respondent.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 48 Physical possession De-notification

Sk. Sakkar @ Mannan v. State of West Bengal

09 Dec 2010 · N. V. Ramana; Surya Kant; Aniruddha Bose
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 20 of the NDPS Act for possession of ganja but reduced the sentence to the period already served considering mitigating factors and the law as it stood at the time of the offence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 ganja possession conscious possession

Central Bureau of Investigation v. Sakru Mahagu Binjewar

14 Jul 2010 · Arun Mishra; Bhushan Ramkrishna Gavai; Surya Kant
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for brutal murders but commuted death sentences to life imprisonment with a minimum 25-year term, reaffirming the 'rarest of rare' doctrine and sentencing principles.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant death penalty rarest of rare life imprisonment commutation of sentence