Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

Haryana Power Generation Corporation Limited v. Harkesh Chand

07 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that apprenticeship training period under the Apprentices Act, 1961, does not count as regular service for grant of Assured Career Progression benefits, setting aside the High Court's contrary decision.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Apprentices Act, 1961 Assured Career Progression Scheme Apprenticeship training Regular service

Ashish Dixit & Ors. v. State of U.P. & Anr.

07 Jan 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court held that domestic violence proceedings under Section 12 of the Act must be confined to the husband and parents-in-law, quashing proceedings against improperly impleaded respondents.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12 impleadment quashing of proceedings

Director of Income Tax (Exemption), New Delhi v. Raunaq Education Foundation

07 Jan 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that a post-dated cheque honoured after the accounting year-end constitutes payment from the date of delivery, and acceptance thereof does not violate Income Tax Act provisions denying exemption to a trust.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant post-dated cheque donation Income Tax Act 1961 Section 13(2)(b)

Hema v. State

07 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for conspiracy and forgery in passport fraud, ruling that parallel investigations by State Police and CBI are permissible and defects in investigation do not warrant acquittal if evidence is reliable.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant parallel investigation CBI jurisdiction defective investigation criminal conspiracy

Parbin Ali and Another v. State of Assam

07 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court upheld a murder conviction based solely on a credible oral dying declaration, emphasizing careful scrutiny and the admissibility of such declarations even without corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC oral dying declaration delay in FIR

EXTRA JUDICIAL EXECUTION VICTIM FAMILIES ASSOCIATION (EEVFAM) AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER

04 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that extra-judicial killings by security forces in Manipur violate the constitutional right to life and constituted a commission to investigate the allegations thoroughly.

constitutional other Significant extra-judicial executions right to life Article 21 disturbed area

Board of Governers in Supersession of Medical Council of India v. Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre

04 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in directing the Medical Council of India to increase medical student intake without following regulatory procedures and set aside the order permitting such increase.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical Council of India seat allocation medical education judicial interference

Mookkiah & Anr v. State

04 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's conviction of appellants for murder, affirming the appellate court's power to reappreciate evidence and interfere with acquittal when justified.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 378 CrPC

PROJECT DIR., LOK JAMBISH PARISHAD & ANR. v. ZEBUNISSHA & ORS.

04 Jan 2013 · H.L. DATTU; CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD

The Supreme Court permitted the withdrawal of an interlocutory application and dismissed it as withdrawn in a civil appeal proceeding.

civil other Procedural withdrawal of interlocutory application permission to withdraw civil appeal Supreme Court

Ashabai & Anr v. State of Maharashtra

04 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of sisters-in-law for instigating the mother-in-law to burn the deceased bride, relying on consistent and admissible dying declarations under Section 32(1) of the Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 498-A IPC instigation

G.M. SOUTH EASTERN RAILWAY v. BENULAL MUKHERJEE

04 Jan 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction in directing pay scale grants not recommended by the Pay Commission, affirming the Government's discretion in such matters and setting aside the High Court and Tribunal orders.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Central Administrative Tribunal Pay Commission Anomalies Committee jurisdiction

Collector, District Gwalior and another v. Cine Exhibition Pvt. Ltd. & Another

04 Jan 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that applications for clarification or modification that are in substance review petitions are not maintainable and must be rejected if they seek to circumvent the prescribed review procedure under the Supreme Court Rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Supreme Court Rules 1966 Order XVIII Rule 5 Order XL review petition clarification application

Ayurved Shastra Seva Mandal & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2013 · Altamas Kabir; Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the refusal to grant admission permissions to Indian medical colleges for 2011-12 due to failure to meet minimum standards and rejected late admissions after the academic year had ended.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Medicine Central Council Act, 1970 AYUSH medical college admission minimum standards

N. Kannapan v. State (Union Territory) Andaman & Nicobar Islands

03 Jan 2013 · B. S. Chauhan; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court dismissed bail applications of quarry operators accused of unauthorized possession and distribution of explosives, holding that prima facie evidence and public safety concerns warrant continued detention until trial progresses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Explosive Substances Act, 1908 bail unauthorized possession explosives

Vajresh Venkatray Anvekar v. State of Karnataka

03 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of a husband for abetment of his wife's suicide within seven years of marriage, applying the presumption under Section 113A of the Evidence Act and emphasizing judicial sensitivity to cruelty against women.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 113A Indian Evidence Act abetment of suicide Section 498-A IPC Section 306 IPC

Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Saju P. Paul

03 Jan 2013 · R. M. Lodha; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 prior to 1994 amendment, insurers are not liable to compensate gratuitous passengers in goods vehicles, including spare drivers, but may be directed to pay and recover from owners to serve justice.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act 1988 Section 147 insurance liability goods vehicle

Md. Faizan Ahmad @ Kalu v. State of Bihar

03 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a child abduction case due to lack of credible evidence, emphasizing that suspicion cannot replace proof in criminal convictions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abduction kidnapping suspicion vs proof criminal evidence

State of Gujarat & Anr. v. Mr. Justice Ramesh (Retd.)

02 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Fakkir Mohamed Ibrahim Kalifulla · 2013 (1) SCALE 7
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court dismissed review petitions affirming that under the Gujarat Lokayukta Act, the Chief Justice's opinion has primacy in Lokayukta appointments, distinguishing it from the Karnataka Act where the Chief Minister's advice is primary.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Lokayukta appointment Gujarat Lokayukta Act, 1986 Karnataka Lokayukta Act, 1984 Chief Justice primacy

M/S. SHIV STEELS v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

17 Dec 2012 · J.B. PARDIWALA; SANDEEP MEHTA · 2025 INSC 1126
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that reassessments under Section 21 of the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 are invalid if earlier assessments were time-barred under Section 19, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation provisions in tax law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993 Section 19 limitation Section 21 sanction time-barred assessment

Educare Charitable Trust v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Nov 2012 · A. K. Sikri
Cites 0 · Cited by 7

The Supreme Court upheld the rejection of a dental college's application to increase BDS seats due to lack of mandatory recognition at the time of application and affirmed the lawful exercise of discretion by the Central Government.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Dentists Act 1948 Dental Council of India Recognition of dental college Increase of admission capacity