Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

A. Srimannarayana v. Dasari Santakumari

09 Jan 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court upheld that prior expert opinion is not mandatory for registering medical negligence complaints in consumer forums, overruling the earlier Martin F. D’Souza judgment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant medical negligence consumer complaint expert opinion Martin F. D’Souza

C.N. Paramsivan v. Sunrise Plaza TR. Partner

09 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld that non-compliance with mandatory deposit requirements under Rule 57 of the Income Tax Rules renders an auction sale under the RDDB Act illegal and void, dismissing the appeal against the High Court's order setting aside the sale.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 Income Tax Rules Rule 57 auction sale

State represented by Inspector of Police, Chennai v. N.S. Gnaneswaran

09 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of supplying a copy of the FIR under Section 154(2) Cr.P.C. is directory and does not vitiate the FIR or investigation in absence of prejudice, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 154 Cr.P.C. FIR registration mandatory vs directory provisions quashing of FIR

Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

09 Jan 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that strict compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act is mandatory, requiring the accused to be informed of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Right to be searched Gazetted Officer Magistrate

Udai Shankar Awasthi v. State of U.P.

09 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 403 and 406 IPC as barred by limitation and an abuse of process, holding the offence was not continuing and a second complaint after dismissal on merits was not maintainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant limitation continuing offence Section 468 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings

Anuja Prabhudessai v. State of Goa

09 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside adverse High Court observations affecting a judicial officer's career made during contempt proceedings discharge, emphasizing protection of judicial careers from prejudicial remarks without proper adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant civil contempt proceedings judicial officer disciplinary proceedings judicial career protection contempt discharge

Navdeep Singh v. State of Haryana

09 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act, ruling that amended sentencing provisions do not apply retrospectively and that the search conducted complied with statutory requirements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act search and seizure

Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla v. Hargovind Jasraj

09 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the lease by the Port Trust was valid and the suit challenging it filed after nearly 18 years was barred by limitation, leading to dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease termination possession takeover limitation period declaration suit

Kavi Raj v. State of J&K

09 Jan 2013 · D.K. Jain; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that Assistant Surgeons appointed to the Directorate of Health Services and posted at Government Medical College Jammu were on deputation, validating their reversion to the parent department and affirming the High Court's decision.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Assistant Surgeons Deputation Substantive appointment Parent department

Rishipal v. State of Uttarakhand

08 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's acquittal of the appellant for murder due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and absence of corpus delicti, affirming that suspicion alone cannot sustain a conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant corpus delicti circumstantial evidence last seen theory murder

Venkatesha v. State of Karnataka

08 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for murder and related offences based on corroborated approver testimony, forensic and medical evidence, and established motive.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant approver testimony corroboration explosive substances motive

Subhash Chand v. State (Delhi Administration)

08 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that appeals against acquittal orders in complaint cases lie exclusively to the High Court under Section 378(4) of the CrPC and not to the Sessions Court under Section 378(1)(a).

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 378 CrPC appeal against acquittal complaint case Sessions Court jurisdiction

State of Bihar and Others v. Nirmal Kumar Gupta

08 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that under Bihar Excise Rules, licence fee liability arises from the date of settlement of excise shops, not from licence issuance, and condonation of delayed advance payment is impermissible.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant excise licence advance security liquor trade Bihar Excise Rules 2004

Pattarvayal Kanakan v. State of Kerala

08 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed eyewitness testimony murder Section 302 IPC unlawful assembly

M/s. Gian Chand & Brothers and Another v. Rattan Lal @ Rattan Singh

08 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that plaintiffs proved the defendant's signatures and books of accounts sufficiently without a handwriting expert, and that the High Court erred in setting aside the lower courts' decrees for recovery of money.

civil appeal_allowed Significant burden of proof onus of proof books of accounts signature denial

Municipal Corporation Rajasthan v. Sanjeev Sachdeva

08 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the amended Section 173-A of the Rajasthan Municipalities Act empowers the State Government to levy valid conversion charges for change of land use, overruling prior interpretations of the un-amended provision.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 173-A Rajasthan Municipalities Act land use conversion charges Rajasthan Municipalities Amendment Act 1999 planned urban development

Nand Kishore Mishra v. Union of India

08 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court held that injury sustained while on duty qualifies as active service under the Army Act and directed grant of commission to a candidate denied on medical grounds.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Army Act 1950 active service medical category SHAPE-II Short Service Commission

The Secretary, Kerala Public Service Commission v. Sheeja P.R.

08 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the supplementary list prepared by the Kerala Public Service Commission cannot be operated after the main rank list is exhausted, thereby setting aside the High Court's direction to appoint from the supplementary list.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Public Service Commission supplementary list main rank list reservation

Hardevinder Singh v. Paramjit Singh

07 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a person prejudicially affected by a decree is entitled to file a second appeal under Section 100 CPC, allowing defendant No. 5's appeal against the High Court's dismissal on maintainability grounds.

civil appeal_allowed Significant person aggrieved second appeal Code of Civil Procedure Section 100 CPC

Registrar of Jadavpur University v. Arindam Dutta Gupta

07 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Chandramauli Kr. Prasad

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court’s direction for admission without considering the applicable Government Orders and Circulars regulating professional college admissions.

administrative appeal_allowed admission to professional colleges Government Orders writ jurisdiction vacant seats