Supreme Court of India

18,256 judgments

Year:

State of Bihar v. Sunny Prakash

18 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's mandamus directing Bihar Government to implement a binding agreement with university employees despite procedural irregularities under Article 166, emphasizing that executive action is binding if established as a government decision.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Article 166 Constitution Rules of Executive Business State Government decision Public Interest Litigation

BRIJESH VIPIN CHANDRA SHAH v. STATE OF GUJARAT

18 Jan 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal directing appointment of a compassionate appointee to a lower Class IV post after failure to clear mandatory examination for Class III post, emphasizing no relaxation of mandatory qualifications but mitigating harshness of termination.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment mandatory qualification post-training examination service termination

The Managing Director, TNSTC & Anr. v. R.S.Kavitha & Ors.

18 Jan 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

The Supreme Court held that prescribed recruitment qualifications cannot be relaxed without explicit provisions and notification, setting aside the High Court's direction to consider a candidate not meeting the height criteria while allowing consideration of another candidate upon production of a non-mandatory certificate.

administrative appeal_partly_allowed Significant recruitment rules height qualification relaxation Article 14

Gopal & Anr v. State of Rajasthan

18 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court upheld life sentences for appellants who lawfully defended themselves initially but exceeded their right of private defence by fatally attacking a fleeing victim.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant right of private defence Section 302 IPC life imprisonment double murder

Export Credit Guarantee Corpn. of India Ltd v. M/s Garg Sons International

17 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that strict compliance with the insurance policy's mandatory declaration clause is essential for claim admissibility, allowing only those claims where the insured timely declared overdue payments.

civil appeal_allowed Significant insurance contract Clause 8(b) declaration of overdue payments strict construction

Kallakkurichi Taluk Retired Official Association v. State of Tamilnadu

17 Jan 2013 · D.K. Jain; Jagdish Singh Khehar
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that the State Government's classification denying equal 'dearness pay' benefits to pensioners retiring on or after 1.6.1988 is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16, directing equal pension computation for all retirees.

labor appeal_allowed Significant dearness allowance dearness pay pension calculation arbitrariness

State of Rajasthan v. Shobha Ram

16 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court held that sitting on the victim to facilitate murder constitutes active participation under Section 34 IPC, reinstating the conviction of the accused for murder committed with common intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 34 IPC common intention joint liability murder

ABBAS ALI v. STATE OF PUNJAB

15 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction under Section 25 of the NDPS Act, ruling that physical disability does not absolve an accused from statutory presumption of culpability or negate permission for use of vehicle in drug transportation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 Section 25 NDPS Act statutory presumption culpable mental state

State Bank of India v. Narendra Kumar Pandey

14 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of a bank officer following an ex parte departmental inquiry, ruling that refusal to cooperate disentitles claims of natural justice violation and that the High Court erred in interfering under Article 226.

labor appeal_allowed Significant departmental inquiry ex parte inquiry natural justice disciplinary proceedings

Manohar Lal v. Ugrasen

14 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court permitted withdrawal of interlocutory applications filed in a curative petition and disposed of them accordingly.

civil other Procedural curative petition interlocutory application withdrawal Supreme Court

Commissioner of Central Excise, Chennai-II Commissionerate v. M/S Australian Foods India (P) Ltd.

14 Jan 2013 · D. K. Jain; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that goods sold from exclusive branded outlets without physical brand markings are branded goods under the S.S.I. notification and thus not eligible for exemption.

tax appeal_allowed Significant S.S.I. exemption brand name trade name physical affixation

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai v. M/S A.R. Enterprises

14 Jan 2013 · D.K. Jain; H.L. Dattu; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that payment of Advance Tax does not amount to disclosure of income under the Income Tax Act, 1961, and non-filing of return by the due date renders income undisclosed for block assessment purposes.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Advance Tax Undisclosed Income Block Assessment Income Tax Act, 1961

Ram Vishambhar v. State of U.P.

11 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for murder under Section 302 IPC and liability under Section 149 IPC, ruling that non-explanation of simple injuries on accused does not vitiate a clear and consistent prosecution case.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 149 IPC unlawful assembly self-defence

Chandrashekaraiah v. Janekere C. Krishna

11 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Chief Justice's opinion has primacy in the appointment of Lokayukta and Upa Lokayukta under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, and failure to consult the Chief Justice renders the appointment illegal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta appointment Chief Justice primacy Karnataka Lokayukta Act 1984 consultation meaning

Raju @ Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan

11 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of two accused based on common intention and modified the acquittal of four others to liability for rioting and voluntarily causing hurt under Section 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC Section 302 IPC

Ravinder Singh v. Sukhbir Singh & Ors.

11 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under the SC/ST Act for filing false and vexatious legal petitions, holding that issue estoppel and absence of mens rea bar such prosecutions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(viii) false, malicious and vexatious proceedings issue estoppel

Suresh Hingorani v. State of Haryana

10 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction for forgery and personation under Sections 419 and 467 IPC, modifying the sentence on humanitarian grounds but dismissing the appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Forgery Personation Section 419 IPC Section 467 IPC

Vinay Kanodia v. J.P. Singh & Ors.

10 Jan 2013 · H.L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's order quashing prosecution for illegal detention and assault, directing the trial to proceed based on medical evidence of injuries.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant illegal detention assault medical evidence cognizance

Chinnam Kameswara Rao & Ors. v. State of A.P. Rep. by Home Secretary

10 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of trial court acquittal, affirming that appellate courts may convict under Section 302 read with 34 IPC despite absence of charge under Section 34 if no prejudice is shown and common intention is established.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Arun Bhandari v. State of U.P.

10 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing cognizance against the accused wife in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, emphasizing that prima facie criminal intent must be presumed at the cognizance stage and that absence of privity of contract alone does not bar prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cheating criminal breach of trust Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC