Supreme Court of India

18,244 judgments

Year:

Ram Vishambhar v. State of U.P.

11 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

Chandrashekaraiah v. Janekere C. Krishna

11 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court held that the Chief Justice's opinion has primacy in the appointment of Lokayukta and Upa Lokayukta under the Karnataka Lokayukta Act, and failure to consult the Chief Justice renders the appointment illegal.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Lokayukta appointment Chief Justice primacy Karnataka Lokayukta Act 1984 consultation meaning

Raju @ Rajendra v. State of Rajasthan

11 Jan 2013 · P. Sathasivam; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the murder convictions of two accused based on common intention and modified the acquittal of four others to liability for rioting and voluntarily causing hurt under Section 149 IPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC Section 302 IPC

Ravinder Singh v. Sukhbir Singh & Ors.

11 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under the SC/ST Act for filing false and vexatious legal petitions, holding that issue estoppel and absence of mens rea bar such prosecutions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 Section 3(1)(viii) false, malicious and vexatious proceedings issue estoppel

Suresh Hingorani v. State of Haryana

10 Jan 2013 · Aftab Alam; Ranjana Prakash Desai

Chinnam Kameswara Rao & Ors. v. State of A.P. Rep. by Home Secretary

10 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's reversal of trial court acquittal, affirming that appellate courts may convict under Section 302 read with 34 IPC despite absence of charge under Section 34 if no prejudice is shown and common intention is established.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention

Arun Bhandari v. State of U.P.

10 Jan 2013 · K. S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in quashing cognizance against the accused wife in a cheating and criminal breach of trust case, emphasizing that prima facie criminal intent must be presumed at the cognizance stage and that absence of privity of contract alone does not bar prosecution.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cheating criminal breach of trust Section 420 IPC Section 406 IPC

A. Srimannarayana v. Dasari Santakumari

09 Jan 2013 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; Anil R. Dave

State represented by Inspector of Police, Chennai v. N.S. Gnaneswaran

09 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of supplying a copy of the FIR under Section 154(2) Cr.P.C. is directory and does not vitiate the FIR or investigation in absence of prejudice, allowing the appeal and setting aside the High Court's quashing order.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 154 Cr.P.C. FIR registration mandatory vs directory provisions quashing of FIR

Ashok Kumar Sharma v. State of Rajasthan

09 Jan 2013 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra

The Supreme Court held that strict compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act is mandatory, requiring the accused to be informed of his right to be searched before a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate, and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 50 NDPS Act Right to be searched Gazetted Officer Magistrate

Udai Shankar Awasthi v. State of U.P.

09 Jan 2013 · Dr. B.S. Chauhan; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings under Sections 403 and 406 IPC as barred by limitation and an abuse of process, holding the offence was not continuing and a second complaint after dismissal on merits was not maintainable.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant limitation continuing offence Section 468 Cr.P.C. quashing of criminal proceedings

Anuja Prabhudessai v. State of Goa

09 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court set aside adverse High Court observations affecting a judicial officer's career made during contempt proceedings discharge, emphasizing protection of judicial careers from prejudicial remarks without proper adjudication.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant civil contempt proceedings judicial officer disciplinary proceedings judicial career protection contempt discharge

Navdeep Singh v. State of Haryana

09 Jan 2013 · H. L. Dattu; Ranjan Gogoi

The Supreme Court upheld the conviction and sentence under the NDPS Act, ruling that amended sentencing provisions do not apply retrospectively and that the search conducted complied with statutory requirements.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 20 NDPS Act Section 50 NDPS Act search and seizure

Board of Trustees of Port of Kandla v. Hargovind Jasraj

09 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

The Supreme Court held that the termination of the lease by the Port Trust was valid and the suit challenging it filed after nearly 18 years was barred by limitation, leading to dismissal of the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant lease termination possession takeover limitation period declaration suit

Kavi Raj v. State of J&K

09 Jan 2013 · D.K. Jain; Jagdish Singh Khehar

The Supreme Court held that Assistant Surgeons appointed to the Directorate of Health Services and posted at Government Medical College Jammu were on deputation, validating their reversion to the parent department and affirming the High Court's decision.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Assistant Surgeons Deputation Substantive appointment Parent department

Rishipal v. State of Uttarakhand

08 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra

Venkatesha v. State of Karnataka

08 Jan 2013 · T.S. Thakur; Gyan Sudha Misra