Supreme Court of India

8,182 judgments

Year:

Shri Mukund Bhavan Trust v. Shrimant Chhatrapati Udayan Raje

20 Dec 2024 · J.B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that a plaint disclosing a suit barred by limitation can be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC without trial, dismissing the plaintiff's claim as time-barred and based on a fictitious cause of action.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC limitation cause of action constructive notice

Dwarika Prasad LRs. v. Prithvi Raj Singh

20 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1030
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that restoration applications under Order IX Rule 13 CPC should not be dismissed on hyper-technical grounds and a party should not suffer due to counsel's negligence, allowing restoration despite delay without a separate condonation application.

civil appeal_allowed Significant restoration application Order IX Rule 13 CPC condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act

JAGGO v. UNION OF INDIA

20 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1034
Cites 0 · Cited by 18

The Supreme Court held that long-serving employees engaged on part-time, ad-hoc terms performing essential duties are entitled to regularization, quashing their termination and directing reinstatement without back wages.

labor appeal_allowed Significant regularization of service part-time employment temporary workers principles of natural justice

Digambar and Another v. State of Maharashtra

20 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 1019
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against parents-in-law in a matrimonial cruelty and miscarriage case due to vague allegations and abuse of legal process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC Section 498-A IPC quashing of FIR miscarriage

Mukesh v. State of Madhya Pradesh & Anr

20 Dec 2024 · R. Mahadevan; J.B. Pardiwala · 2024 INSC 1026
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a compromise decree affirming pre-existing ownership of immovable property does not require registration or payment of stamp duty, allowing mutation of land records in favor of the appellant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compromise decree registration stamp duty Indian Stamp Act, 1899

Prakash and Others v. State of Maharashtra

20 Dec 2024 · B. R. Gavai; K. V. Viswanathan · 2024 INSC 1020
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and discharged the appellants from charges under Section 306 IPC due to lack of proximate instigation and mens rea linking them to the deceased's suicide.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant abetment of suicide Section 306 IPC mens rea proximate nexus

Amutha v. A.R. Subramanian

19 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1033

The Supreme Court upheld the grant of divorce on grounds of mental cruelty and desertion, recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage and awarding permanent alimony to the wife and daughter.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty desertion irretrievable breakdown divorce

Ravi Dhingra v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1013

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed multiple complaint cases under Section 138 NI Act for lack of mandatory averments that the accused was responsible for the company's business, following the precedent in Ashok Shewakramani’s case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 NI Act Section 482 CrPC quashment of complaint dishonour of cheque

Karan Talwar v. The State of Tamil Nadu

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Rajesh Bindal · 2024 INSC 1012

The Supreme Court held that a co-accused's confession alone is insufficient to frame charges under Section 227 Cr.P.C. and discharged the accused for lack of prima facie evidence under the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 227 Cr.P.C. discharge application co-accused confession prima facie case

Rajeev Kumar Upadhyay v. Srikant Upadhyay & Ors.

19 Dec 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1008
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court emphasized the constitutional protection of dignity and directed expeditious trial of accused in a case involving public humiliation and assault based on witchcraft allegations, criticizing undue stays on proceedings.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dignity witchcraft accusations women's rights Article 21

The State of Orissa v. Pratima Behera

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1010
Cites 0 · Cited by 9

The Supreme Court held that at the charge framing stage under Section 239 Cr.P.C., only a prima facie case is required and set aside the High Court’s order discharging the accused for abetment under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 239 Cr.P.C. Prevention of Corruption Act disproportionate assets charge framing

State of U.P. v. Sandeep Agarwal

19 Dec 2024 · Abhay S. Oka; Augustine George Masih · 2024 INSC 1015
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that termination without disciplinary enquiry was unjustified but reinstatement was inappropriate, directing voluntary retirement with pension refixation effective from termination date.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant voluntary retirement scheme Article 311(2) Constitution of India termination without disciplinary enquiry absenteeism

P. MANIKANDAN v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1007

The Supreme Court held that ordering de novo investigation and prosecution after an acquittal violates the principle of double jeopardy under Article 20(2) and Section 300 Cr.P.C., quashing the High Court's direction for reinvestigation and acquitting the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant double jeopardy Article 20(2) Constitution of India Section 300 Cr.P.C. Section 386 Cr.P.C.

Muskan Enterprises & Anr. v. The State of Punjab & Anr.

19 Dec 2024 · Dipankar Datta; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 1046
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the Appellate Court under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act has discretion to exempt deposit of 20% compensation in exceptional cases and that successive petitions under Section 482 CrPC are maintainable if based on change in law or circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 148 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 482 CrPC deposit condition

Tirith Kumar v. Daduram

19 Dec 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1005

The Supreme Court held that the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 does not apply to Scheduled Tribes without Central Government notification and affirmed inheritance rights of tribal daughters based on justice, equity, and good conscience.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Scheduled Tribes Article 342 Constitution Justice equity and good conscience

Ajith G. Das & Ors. v. State of Kerala & Ors.

19 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1037

The Supreme Court held that while KPSC enjoys autonomy in selection, it must comply with the State Government’s binding directives to expand rank lists to fill vacancies, allowing the appellants’ appeals and directing KPSC to act accordingly.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Public Service Commission rank list expansion Article 320 Constitution State Government vacancies

Bherulal Bhimaji Oswal v. Madhusudan N. Kumbhare

19 Dec 2024 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2024 INSC 1035

The Supreme Court held that failure to diagnose and treat post-operative eye infection by the treating doctor constitutes medical negligence and restored compensation awarded to the patient.

consumer_medical_negligence appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence endophthalmitis post-operative infection cataract surgery

Ashok Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2024 INSC 1011
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's conviction for homicidal death by strangulation, rejecting the plea of alibi and suicide, affirming the importance of strict proof and burden of explanation under Section 106 Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant homicidal death strangulation alibi Section 106 Evidence Act

Chandrabhan Rupchand Dakale v. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

19 Dec 2024 · C. T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Kumar · 2024 INSC 1009
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's dismissal of the appellant's challenge to surplus land determination under the Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, affirming that transfers made to defeat the Act are invalid and res judicata bars reopening settled issues.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Section 8 Section 10 Section 19

MANSOOR SAHEB v. SALIMA

19 Dec 2024 · C.T. Ravikumar; Sanjay Karol · 2024 INSC 1006

Under Mohammedan law, lifetime partition of property is impermissible and an oral gift requires clear declaration, acceptance, and delivery of possession; the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal affirming the invalidity of the alleged oral gift and lifetime partition.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Mohammedan law partition gift hiba