Supreme Court of India

14,826 judgments

Year:

M/S FAIME MAKERS PVT. LTD. v. DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR

01 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 423

The Supreme Court held that a quasi-judicial authority cannot entertain a second application contrary to its earlier order directing resolution of legal complications, applying the principle of res judicata to quash the unilateral assignment of leasehold rights granted without jurisdiction.

civil appeal_allowed Significant quasi-judicial authority res judicata unilateral assignment leasehold rights

Ramayana Ispat Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors.

01 Apr 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 424

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of RERC's 2016 open access regulations, affirming its jurisdiction over intra-state open access and the reasonableness of scheduling and penalty provisions to ensure grid stability.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Electricity Act 2003 open access Rajasthan Electricity Regulatory Commission inter-state transmission

GASTRADE INTERNATIONAL v. COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, KANDLA

28 Mar 2025 · B. V. Nagarathna; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 411

The Supreme Court upheld the classification of imported goods as High Speed Diesel based on partial but conclusive laboratory tests and expert evidence, affirming the Customs Department's confiscation and penalties.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Tariff Act, 1975 High Speed Diesel Base Oil IS 1460:2005

The State of Jharkhand & Ors. v. Rukma Kesh Mishra

28 Mar 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Manmohan · 2025 INSC 412

The Supreme Court held that absence of separate approval of the charge-sheet by the Chief Minister does not invalidate disciplinary dismissal if the proposal including the draft charge-sheet was approved, and quashed High Court orders reinstating the dismissed officer.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet approval Article 311 civil service dismissal

Imran Pratapgarhi v. State of Gujarat and Anr.

28 Mar 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 410

The Supreme Court quashed the FIR against a Rajya Sabha member for posting a poem on social media, holding it did not constitute an offence and emphasizing the protection of freedom of speech under Article 19(1)(a) and the necessity of preliminary inquiry under Section 173(3) of BNSS.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant freedom of speech and expression Article 19(1)(a) preliminary inquiry Section 173(3) BNSS

Aslam alias Imran v. State of Madhya Pradesh

27 Mar 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges under Section 302 IPC due to unreliable and contradictory prosecution evidence, granting him the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder benefit of doubt eyewitness testimony

Samtola Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

27 Mar 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; S. V. N. Bhatti · 2025 INSC 404

The Supreme Court held that eviction of a son under the Senior Citizens Act is discretionary and not mandatory, especially when property ownership is disputed and maintenance is being paid, dismissing the appeal seeking eviction.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 eviction senior citizens maintenance

R. Shashirekha v. State of Karnataka

27 Mar 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 402

The Supreme Court upheld quashing of proceedings under Section 306 IPC for lack of proximate instigation but set aside quashing of Section 420 IPC proceedings, directing trial court to proceed based on investigation material.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Section 306 IPC Section 420 IPC Quashing of FIR Proximate cause

Hiralal Motilal Parikh v. Spl. Laq Officer & Anr.

27 Mar 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 815
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that compensation for land acquisition must reflect bona fide proximate sale transactions and land potentiality, enhancing the awarded amount from Rs. 53 to Rs. 107 per square meter.

property appeal_allowed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation market value Section 4 notification

T. UDAYKUMAR v. RAVICHANDRAN

27 Mar 2025 · SANJIV KHANNA; SANJAY KUMAR · 2025 INSC 510

The Supreme Court upheld the acquisition of land by TNHB, rejected the appellant's ownership claims based on invalid sale deeds, upheld cancellation of Pattas, and protected the rights of innocent flat buyers.

property appeal_dismissed Significant land acquisition Tamil Nadu Housing Board Ratification Deed sale deed

Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation v. Vincent Daniel

27 Mar 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 408

The Supreme Court held that the theory of deduction does not apply under the 2013 Land Acquisition Act and upheld compensation based on circle rates fixed under the Stamp Act, dismissing the appellant's challenge.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Act, 2013 theory of deduction market value circle rates

Arun v. State of Madhya Pradesh

27 Mar 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar; K.V. Viswanathan · 2025 INSC 406

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of murder charges due to unreliable and inconsistent prosecution evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder benefit of doubt oral evidence inconsistent testimony

Ramesh Kumaran & Anr. v. State through the Inspector of Police & Anr.

27 Mar 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 405

The Supreme Court quashed cross FIRs between two lawyers after an unconditional apology was tendered, emphasizing professional ethics and using its Article 142 powers to end prolonged litigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant cross FIRs quashing of FIR Article 142 Constitution unconditional apology

M/S JSW STEEL LIMITED v. PRATISHTHA THAKUR HARITWAL

27 Mar 2025 · B. R. Gavai; Augustine George Masih · 2025 INSC 401

The Supreme Court held that government dues not included in an approved insolvency Resolution Plan stand extinguished and recovery proceedings thereon constitute contempt of court.

civil petition_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Resolution Plan Section 31 Extinguishment of claims

Yadwinder Singh v. Lakhi Alias Lakhwinder Singh & Ors.

26 Mar 2025 · Ahsanuddin Amanullah; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 420
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that courts may summon additional accused under Section 319 CrPC based on strong evidence recorded during trial, even before cross-examination, and set aside the High Court's order quashing such summons.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 319 CrPC summons additional accused examination-in-chief

Gajendra Singh v. Reena Balmiki

26 Mar 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 413

The Supreme Court granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage after 17 years of separation and awarded Rs. 40 lakhs as permanent alimony to the wife under its Article 142 powers.

family appeal_allowed Significant irretrievable breakdown of marriage Article 142 Constitution of India permanent alimony maintenance

Rekha Sharad Ushir v. Saptashrungi Mahila Nagari Sahkari Patsansta Ltd.

26 Mar 2025 · Abhay S. Oka; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 399
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court quashed a complaint under Section 138 NI Act due to suppression of material documents by the complainant, holding it an abuse of process and emphasizing the Magistrate's duty to scrutinize complaints before issuing process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act dishonour of cheque abuse of process suppression of material facts

Nagpur Housing and Area Development Board (A MHADA Unit) v. Manohar Burde

26 Mar 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 398

The Supreme Court restored the NCDRC's award of 9% interest on delayed possession refund, reduced compensation, and set aside the High Court's enhancement of interest to 15%.

civil appeal_partly_allowed Significant delay in possession interest on refund consumer protection supervisory jurisdiction

STATE REP. BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VIGILANCE AND ANTI CORRUPTION CHENNAI CITY-I DEPARTMENT v. G. EASWARAN

26 Mar 2025 · PAMIDIGHANTAM SRI NARASIMHA; MANOJ MISRA · 2025 INSC 397

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of corruption prosecution, holding that inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. must be exercised sparingly and the validity of sanction and evidence are to be examined at trial, not at the quashing stage.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. disproportionate assets Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 sanction to prosecute

Deepak Kumar Tala v. State of Andhra Pradesh

25 Mar 2025 · Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha; Manoj Misra · 2025 INSC 390
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court granted anticipatory bail to the appellant, holding that the FIR did not prima facie establish essential ingredients of offences under the SC/ST Act and that the allegations required trial for determination.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act caste slur public view