Supreme Court of India

16,793 judgments

Year:

Prabhavathi & Ors. v. The Managing Director

28 Feb 2025 · Sanjay Karol; Prashant Kumar Mishra · 2025 INSC 293
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court held that contributory negligence must be proven by evidence and enhanced compensation to the dependents of a deceased motor accident victim, rejecting the High Court's apportionment of fault and income assessment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim contributory negligence compensation assessment standard of proof

Abdul Wahid & Anr v. State of Rajasthan

28 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Ujjal Bhuyan · 2025 INSC 295

The Supreme Court acquitted appellants convicted of murder due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, investigative deficiencies, and lack of corroborative evidence, emphasizing the benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal conviction_overturned Significant eyewitness testimony benefit of doubt investigative lapses Section 302 IPC

Pradip N. Sharma v. State of Gujarat & Anr.

28 Feb 2025 · Vikram Nath; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 291
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Supreme Court upheld the FIR against a retired IAS officer for alleged misuse of official position but granted him anticipatory bail, emphasizing the need for investigation and cooperation without custodial detention.

criminal appeal_dismissed (quashing petition), appeal_allowed (anticipatory bail) Significant quashing of FIR anticipatory bail criminal breach of trust misuse of official position

M. Jameela v. State of Kerala

28 Feb 2025 · Aravind Kumar; N. V. Anjaria · 2025 INSC 1254

The Supreme Court held that 37.50 acres of bona fide coffee and cardamom plantations existing prior to 10 May 1971 are exempt from vesting under the Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971, allowing the appellants' appeal and confirming their ownership.

property appeal_allowed Significant Kerala Private Forests (Vesting and Assignment) Act, 1971 Section 3(2) exemption Section 3(3) exemption personal cultivation

Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India

27 Feb 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi · 2025 INSC 272
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Supreme Court upheld the amended Customs Act provisions empowering customs officers to arrest without warrant for specified cognizable offences, rejecting prior precedent and affirming procedural safeguards and judicial review.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 arrest powers cognizable offence non-bailable offence

Dileepbhai Nanubhai Sanghani v. State of Gujarat

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 280

The Supreme Court quashed criminal proceedings against a former Minister for lack of material proving demand or acceptance of bribe, holding that mere policy deviation does not constitute corruption under the Prevention of Corruption Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 20 presumption demand and acceptance of bribe discharge application

Gauri Mahto v. The State of Bihar

27 Feb 2025 · J.K. Maheshwari; Aravind Kumar · 2025 INSC 817

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellant in a kidnapping-for-ransom case, holding that prosecution failed to prove essential ingredients of Section 364A IPC, especially threat or ransom demand, and that conviction cannot rest solely on confessional statements of absconding co-accused.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 364A IPC kidnapping for ransom confessional statement corroboration

SACHIN JAISWAL v. M/s HOTEL ALKA RAJE & ORS.

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 275
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that property contributed by a partner becomes partnership property under Section 14 of the Indian Partnership Act, dismissing the appellant's claim that ownership could not be transferred by a relinquishment deed.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Section 14 partnership property relinquishment deed

Sanjay Kumar v. State of Bihar & Ors.

27 Feb 2025 · Sanjiv Khanna; Sanjay Kumar · 2025 INSC 287

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's summary dismissal of a criminal appeal, directing a fresh hearing on merits considering the evidence and trial records.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant appellate procedure dismissal in limine eyewitness testimony Section 164 CrPC statement

KANISHK SINHA & ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ANOTHER

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Ahsanuddin Amanullah · 2025 INSC 278
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that the affidavit requirement for complaints under Section 156(3) CrPC as laid down in Priyanka Srivastava applies prospectively and dismissed the appellants' challenge to FIRs registered prior to that ruling.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC affidavit requirement prospective operation retrospective operation

Raju @ Nirpendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh

27 Feb 2025 · Vikram Nath; Sanjay Karol · 2025 INSC 392

The Supreme Court upheld convictions for kidnapping and gang rape of a minor, holding that consent is irrelevant in statutory rape and the prosecutrix's reliable testimony suffices for conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant statutory rape minor consent kidnapping

Manoj Rameshlal Chhabriya v. Mahesh Prakash Ahuja

27 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 282

The Supreme Court held that the High Court must grant leave to appeal under Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. if a prima facie case or arguable points exist and remitted the acquittal appeal for merits hearing.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 378(3) Cr.P.C. leave to appeal acquittal appeal prima facie case

State of Chhattisgarh v. Ashok Bhoi

27 Feb 2025 · Bela M. Trivedi; Prasanna B. Varale · 2025 INSC 256

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case, holding that circumstantial evidence must form a complete chain to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt and suspicion alone cannot sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence last seen theory Section 106 Evidence Act burden of proof

Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation v. Subhash S/O Laxmanrao Bramhe

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; K. Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 279
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court upheld the Industrial Court's order setting aside MSRTC's 2015 pay scale revision, reaffirming that eligibility for pay fixation under the 1956 Settlement cannot be conditioned by absorption criteria under the 1985 Settlement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant pay scale fixation daily wage workers 1956 Settlement 1978 Resolution

M. S. Ananthamurthy & Anr. v. J. Manjula

27 Feb 2025 · J. B. Pardiwala; R. Mahadevan · 2025 INSC 273

The Supreme Court held that a General Power of Attorney not coupled with interest terminates on the death of the principal and does not confer title, validating subsequent registered sale deeds by legal heirs and dismissing the appellants' claim.

property appeal_dismissed Significant General Power of Attorney Irrevocable Power of Attorney Section 201 Indian Contract Act Section 202 Indian Contract Act

PAPPAMMAL THROUGH LR R. KRSNA MURTII v. JOTHI & ANR

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Prashant Kumar Mishra

The Supreme Court upheld the impleadment of a legal heir as defendant in a property suit, emphasizing that all necessary parties must be heard to adjudicate disputes among legal heirs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant legal representative substitution impleadment of parties Order XXII Rule 5 CPC Order I Rule 10(2) CPC

Mansoor Ali Farida Irshad Ali & Others v. Tahsildari, Special Cell & Others

27 Feb 2025 · Sudhanshu Dhulia; Krishnan Vinod Chandran · 2025 INSC 276

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of eviction notices issued by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority for redevelopment of a censused slum area, dismissing appellants' challenge based on MHADA tenancy and procedural grounds.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Slum Rehabilitation Authority Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Development Control Regulations censused slum

GARDEN REACH SHIPBUILDERS AND ENGINEERS LIMITED v. GRSE LIMITED WORKMENS UNION

25 Feb 2025 · Dipankar Datta; Rajesh Bindal · 2025 INSC 363
Cites 1 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that a High Court bench must have roster-based jurisdiction to hear writ petitions, setting aside an unauthorized Division Bench order directing compassionate appointments and remanding the matter for fresh hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant jurisdiction High Court roster Chief Justice master of roster writ petition

ARVIND KUMAR BHATI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH

25 Feb 2025 · SANJIV KHANNA; SANJAY KUMAR · 2025 INSC 286

The Supreme Court held that the High Court exceeded its writ jurisdiction by issuing directions on policy and administrative matters related to hospital maintenance and ambulance traffic, setting aside those directions while allowing fresh petitions with relevant data.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant writ jurisdiction policy matters day-to-day administration fundamental rights

Kanahiya Lal Arya v. Md. Ehshan & Ors.

25 Feb 2025 · Pankaj Mithal; Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh · 2025 INSC 271

The Supreme Court held that a landlord's bona fide need for eviction is a genuine requirement judged as on suit filing date, allowing eviction to establish an ultrasound machine despite tenants' prior compromise and sons' lack of expertise.

civil appeal_allowed Significant bona fide need eviction landlord-tenant dispute ultrasound machine