Supreme Court of India

18,257 judgments

Year:

Soma Isolux NH One Tollway Private Limited v. Harish Kumar Puri & Ors.

17 Apr 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Pinaki Chandra Ghose

The Supreme Court held that a High Court cannot nullify contractual rights through PIL directions and set aside penalties imposed on a highway concessionaire for project delays without considering contractual terms and prior judicial decisions.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Concession Agreement Public Interest Litigation Toll Plaza Relocation National Highways Authority of India

Sushil Kumar Singhal v. Pramukh Sachiv Irrigation Department

17 Apr 2014 · Anil R. Dave; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that salary and pension cannot be retrospectively revised or recovered beyond the 34-month limitation period prior to retirement as prescribed by Government policy, quashing recovery and pension reduction orders against a retired employee.

civil appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation pension fixation salary recovery Government Order 16.01.2007

Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. v. Official Liquidator of M/s. Ambica Mills Company Ltd.

17 Apr 2014 · Surinder Singh Nijjar; A.K. Sikri · 2014 (1) SCC 1
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Supreme Court held that an interim order and undertaking restraining asset alienation do not create a registered charge, and ONGC is not entitled to preferential payment in Ambica Mills' liquidation.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant charge registration Companies Act 1956 Section 125 secured creditor

State of Himachal Pradesh v. Raj Kumar

17 Apr 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a murder case, emphasizing the necessity of a complete chain of circumstantial evidence excluding all reasonable doubt to sustain conviction.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence murder Section 302 IPC extra-judicial confession

Association of Unified Tele Services Providers v. Union of India

17 Apr 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court upheld the CAG's constitutional and statutory authority to audit private telecom licensees' accounts relating to revenue payable to the Union, affirming parliamentary oversight over public funds derived from natural resources like spectrum.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Comptroller and Auditor General Article 149 Constitution Section 16 CAG Act 1971 Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Rules 2002

Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd v. B.M. Motors

17 Apr 2014 · T.S. Thakur; C. Nagappan

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order directing payment to retired partners and mandated BPCL to consider reconstitution of the partnership dealership treating the 1984 agreement as a No Objection Certificate, dismissing BPCL's appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partnership reconstitution No Objection Certificate retirement of partners ex-parte decree

D.A.V. College Managing Committee v. Laxminarayan Mishra & Ors.

16 Apr 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court allowed DAV schools in Odisha to revise fees as per a Committee’s recommendations to meet 6th Pay Commission salary liabilities, emphasizing reasonable profit and regulation of fees by competent authority.

education appeal_allowed Significant private unaided educational institutions fee structure Orissa Education Act, 1969 6th Central Pay Commission

Shamsher Singh & Ors v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors

16 Apr 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that specific performance may be refused under Section 20(2) of the Specific Relief Act where contract terms are inequitable and the property is mortgaged, modifying the decree to award monetary compensation instead.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance discretionary power Section 20(2) Specific Relief Act mortgage

Kokkilagadda Subba Rao v. Divisional Manager, United India Assurance Co. Ltd.

16 Apr 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the repudiation of an insurance claim for a fishing boat that sank outside permitted territorial waters, dismissing the appeal and refusing to entertain new contentions raised for the first time before it.

civil appeal_dismissed insurance claim repudiation territorial waters fishing boat

Dina Nath (D) by Lrs. & Anr. v. Subhash Chand Saini & Ors.

16 Apr 2014 · T.S. Thakur; J.S. Khehar

The Supreme Court held that striking out a tenant's defence under Section 15(7) of the Delhi Rent Control Act is discretionary and only justified in cases of deliberate or contumacious default, allowing the tenant to contest eviction where rent arrears were paid and default was not wilful.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 15(7) strike out defence tenant protection

Devi Ispat Limited & Anr. v. State Bank of India & Ors.

16 Apr 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Madan B. Lokur

The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of Devi Ispat's writ petition challenging NPA classification and possession of secured assets, emphasizing the mandatory exhaustion of statutory remedies under the SARFAESI Act before judicial intervention.

civil petition_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Section 13(3A) Section 13(4)

Shamim Bano v. Asraf Khan

16 Apr 2014 · Dipak Misra; Vikramajit Sen

The Supreme Court held that a divorced Muslim woman can claim maintenance under Section 125 CrPC beyond the Iddat period even after filing an application under the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication.

family appeal_allowed Significant maintenance Section 125 CrPC Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986 Iddat period

Iswarlal Mohanlal Thakkar v. Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd.

16 Apr 2014 · Gyan Sudha Mishra; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court restored the Labour Court's award holding that a birth certificate issued by a competent authority prevails over school records in date of birth disputes, and premature termination based on incorrect date of birth is illegal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant date of birth dispute birth certificate school leaving certificate premature termination

Om Prakash v. State of Haryana

16 Apr 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; Dipak Misra
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court upheld convictions under Sections 148, 302 read with 149 IPC, affirming that members of an unlawful assembly sharing a common object are liable for offences committed by any member, and delay in FIR was not fatal to prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant unlawful assembly Section 149 IPC delay in FIR ocular testimony

Sidhartha Sarawgi v. Board of Trustees for the Port of Kolkata

16 Apr 2014 · Gyan Sudha Misra; Kurian Joseph

The Supreme Court held that issuance of ejectment notices by the Land Manager under authorization from the Chairman is a valid ministerial act and does not constitute illegal sub-delegation of powers under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant delegatus non potest delegare delegation of powers Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 lease termination

Ranjan Kumar v. State of Bihar

16 Apr 2014 · Dipak Misra; M.Y. Eqbal · AIR 2008 SC 5
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's quashing of Medical Laboratory Technician appointments, holding that non-impleaded appointees cannot be adversely affected and candidates cannot challenge a selection process after participating without objection.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant natural justice necessary parties writ petition selection process

Commissioner of Wealth Tax, Rajkot v. Estate of Late HMM Vikramsinhji of Gondal

16 Apr 2014 · R. M. Lodha; Shiva Kirti Singh

The Supreme Court held that income from U.K. discretionary trusts is not includible in the settlor's or his son's income for tax purposes, affirming the trusts' discretionary nature and dismissing the Revenue's appeals.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant discretionary trust specific trust income tax wealth tax

Kakali Ghosh v. Chief Secretary, Andaman & Nicobar Administration

15 Apr 2014 · Sudhansu Jyoti Mukhopadhaya; V. Gopala Gowda

The Supreme Court held that a woman government employee is entitled to uninterrupted 730 days of Child Care Leave under Rule 43-C, and leave cannot be arbitrarily restricted to three spells per year without valid reasons.

service_law appeal_allowed Significant Child Care Leave Central Civil Services Leave Rules 1972 Rule 43-C leave entitlement

National Legal Services Authority v. Union of India

15 Apr 2014 · K.S. Radhakrishnan; A.K. Sikri
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court of India recognized transgender persons as a third gender, affirming their fundamental right to self-identify their gender and directing the State to provide constitutional protections and welfare measures.

constitutional appeal_allowed Landmark transgender rights third gender gender identity Articles 14 and 21

Prakash v. State of Karnataka

15 Apr 2014 · Ranjana Prakash Desai; Madan B. Lokur
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Supreme Court acquitted Prakash due to failure of the prosecution to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt on circumstantial evidence, unreliable fingerprint and blood evidence, and flawed investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence identification parade fingerprint evidence Section 313 CrPC